Mobile Drawer Trigger

Mobile Search


Schools Nav

Top Search

Utility Container

Main Container

SDJ Referendum November 2020

Referendum Presentations

SDJ invites community members to attend one of several referendum one-hour informational sessions to be held at the district's administrative offices -- The Educational Services Center (527 S. Franklin Street, Janesville, 53548). The sessions are intended to inform the attendees on both the operational and facilities question of the November 3rd referendum. Due to health and safety guidelines, the group size is limited to 15 in the room. 

Presentation Dates/Times:

  • Tuesday, October 6, 2020: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
  • Thursday, October 15, 2020: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
  • Tuesday, October 20, 2020: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
  • Thursday, October 22, 2020: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
 Click here to reserve your spot

Questions: Contact Julie Yerke 608-743-5010

This November, residents of the School District of Janesville (SDJ) will consider two referendum questions critically important to the future of our local public schools. The Board of Education and the SDJ Administration need your input regarding how you want your community's schools to function and operate now and into the future. 

More information about the two questions follows, along with information about the process the board used to engage the community and a series of questions and answers. If you should have any questions, please contact Patrick Gasper, Public Information Specialist, at 608-743-5091 or

What are the Two Referenda Questions?

District Safety and Facility Needs Question and Operational Needs Question

Question 1 The first question is related to the district’s facilities. While our district’s buildings have been well maintained, the average age of our schools is 64 years. In addition to regular maintenance, big-ticket items like windows, roofs and boilers need to be replaced. This question focuses on school safety and secure pathways/entrances as well as addressing the most urgent facility needs now. District Operational Needs Referendum. If approved by voters, the impact of the facilities referendum would be a $5 increase in school-related taxes for every $100,000 in assessed value, beginning with tax bills in December of 2021.

Question 2 The second question is related to district operations. Despite efforts by the board and district to cut costs and save money, the district’s revenue limit—a state-imposed limit on the amount of money a district can receive—has decreased faster than the district’s ability to realize cost savings as a result of having smaller enrollments.

The board designed the solution that will be presented to voters in November to address this issue, protect the outstanding education experience provided to our students and protect the needs of property taxpayers. If the operational referendum is approved by voters, it would lead to a gradual increase in school-related taxes over 4 years, starting with tax bills issued in December 2021, finishing at total increase of about $114 per $100,000 assessed value in 2024-25.

Question #1: Safety and Facility Needs

The School District of Janesville works hard to make the most of the investments taxpayers make in their local public schools. This includes extending the life of district facilities, stretching the revenue the district receives, and anticipating financial challenges before they affect the district.  

In addition to its operational considerations, the district has facility and safety related needs. While all our facilities have been well maintained, the average age of our schools is 64 years. In fact, our newest school, Kennedy Elementary, was constructed more than 20 years ago. The district’s oldest school, Rock River Charter School, is approaching its 140th birthday. 

In 2016, the district commissioned a facilities study that focused on its envelope and mechanical systems. The study included a review of the district's mechanical systems, such as boilers, air handlers, electrical systems, windows, and roofs. The report indicated that if all the needed work was done at one time, the estimated cost would be $111.1 million. 

It is important to note that the report only addressed fixing existing mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and not making existing space more conducive to modern learning or making schools more safe/secure. 

Finally, while the district has an annual maintenance budget, costs for big-ticket items across the district exceed our ability to cover them with the annual budget. To address the costs of most of the items outlined in the facilities report, the district would need permission from the community in the form of a referendum. 

The facilities referendum would address issues such as school security, life safety system, and the replacing of outdated mechanical systems like boilers. If approved by voters, the impact of the facilities referendum would be a $5 increase in school-related taxes for every $100,000 in assessed value, beginning with tax bills in December of 2021. 

Question #2: Operational Needs 

Wisconsin school districts are funded by a combination of state aid and local property taxes. Each district has a revenue limit created by the state budget. This limit caps the amount of money a district can receive through state aid and local property taxes. 

The School District of Janesville has a lower revenue limit per member than an overwhelming majority of districts in the area. This is partially because a Wisconsin district's revenue limit is tied to its enrollment. Districts with declining year-over-year enrollments, such as Janesville, have revenue limits that typically decline faster than their ability to save money due to serving fewer students. Based on new forecasting conducted by the district with its financial adviser, the district is predicting a significant budget deficit starting next year if efforts are not made to address it. This is despite efforts to trim costs throughout the district.

In Wisconsin, school boards may present an operational referendum to voters in the community that, if passed, allow a district to raise its revenue limit authority. This is an option currently being used by a majority of school districts in the state. 

If approved by voters in November, the four-year, non-recurring operational referendum would address urgent issues, including maintaining programs and services. Under this scenario, the district’s budget would be balanced, only limited cuts would be made, and school-related taxes would remain below the state average. The impact of both referenda if passed can be seen in the table that follows. (NOTE- table includes the $5 increase for the Safety and Facility Needs question)

School Safety and Boiler Question

Property Tax Impact with Proposed Facilities and Operational Referendum


December 2020
Tax Bill

December 2021
Tax Bill

December 2022
Tax Bill

December 2023
Tax Bill

December 2024
Tax Bill

2020-2021  $0.00        
2021-2022    $39.00      
2022-2023      $31.00    
2023-2024        $21.00  
2024-2025          $28.00
    Total referendum tax increase (per $100,000 assessed value) over 4 years (compared to 2020):   $119.00
$100,000 home
operational referendum
increase compared
to 2020
 $0.00  $39.00  $70.00  $91.00  $119.00

The referendum would continue for a total of $119 per $100,000 of assessed value at the end of the 2024-25 school year. In other words, there would be an increase of $39 over the base in year one, $70 over the base in year two, $91 over the base in year three, and $119 over the base in year four. 

Engaging the Community, Gathering Input

The SDJ and the Board of Education worked hard to engage the entire district community in advance of placing the referendum questions on the ballot. This included working with a Community Financial Advisory Committee, a group composed of local business, industry, service and nonprofit leaders who have a financial acumen. The district and board also conducted a community-wide survey and used the results to inform their decision making. The highest-ranked items from the community survey are central to the solutions the Board of Education will present to voters in November. The top three ranked items included:
  • Safety and security;
  • Attracting and retaining highly qualified staff; and
  • Maintaining small class size.
Think of a CFAC as a kitchen cabinet of advisors who will examine the district’s financial records, ask tough questions, and make a recommendation about a referendum.  The CFAC is made up of Janesville community members with knowledge of fiscal matters.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

If you should have any questions, please contact Patrick Gasper, Public Information Specialist, at 608-743-5091 or