Business Services
The Business Services Office is responsible for District accounting, student transportation, purchasing, food services, buildings and grounds maintenance and oversees the annual District audit. It is through these areas that the Business Services Office supports lifelong learning for the students of the Janesville School District.
In addition, the Business Services Department prepares financial reports for the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Wisconsin Retirement System, Internal Revenue Service, and state and federal grants.
Business Services
- Audit
- Accounts Payable & Receivable
- Budget Development
- Contract Management
- Debt Management
- Financial Management & Reporting
- Fiscal Reporting
- Policy Development
Auxiliary Services
- Facilities Management Services
- Food Nutrition Services
- Student Transportation Services
- Meet the Staff
- Audited Financial Statements
- Budget Books
- Facilities Use Information
- Financial Information - Funds
- Tax Levy Information
- Vendor Proposals
Meet the Staff
Audited Financial Statements
Budget Books
Budget Books
ADA Compliant Budget Books
- Budget Book 2024-25
- Budget Book 2023-24
- Budget Book 2022-23
- Budget Book 2021-2022
- Budget Book 2020-2021
Budget Book 2024-25
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2024-25
- School District of Janesville
- Introduction / District Overview
- District Funds
- Building the Budget
- General Fund (10) Revenues / Expenses
- Special Education
- General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
- Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
- Capital Funds (46 & 49)
- Food Service
- Employee Benefits Trust Fund
- Special Revenue Trust Fund
- Enrollment & Membership
- Revenue Limit Authority
- Property Tax Information
- Tax Levy
- Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
School District of Janesville
Introduction / District Overview
NTRODUCTION
The Business Services Group is pleased to present the 2023-24 School District of Janesville (“SDJ”) budget.
A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 24, 2023. As a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the District is receiving federal grants to support its response. The
District is using funds to offer a robust online instruction platform, reduce class size at the elementary
level, maintain secondary instructional pathways, invest in sanitation efforts, install bottle filling stations,
provide personal protective equipment such as face masks, and improve indoor air quality. In aggregate,
the District will receive over $27 million in federal funding through three different Elementary and
Secondary School Emergency Relief (“ESSER”) and Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (“GEER”)
Funds. The funds are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis, meaning the District must incur costs and
then be reimbursed. Some of these funds are received by the District and are required to be allocated to
private schools. Some of these federal funds were used during the 2020-21 through 2022-23 fiscal years,
and most of the remainder will be used during the 2023-24 fiscal year. A portion may carryover to fiscal
year 2024-25. Of the remaining funds, a portion will be used for indoor air quality at Franklin Middle
School and social distancing in greenhouses at Craig and Parker High Schools.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves over 9,300 pre-kindergarten through 12th grade students in 20
schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are
provided in two comprehensive high schools (9-12), three middle schools (6-8), twelve elementary schools
(K-5), and twelve P4J Community Partnership sites (4-year-old early learners). In addition, we serve
students in three charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, and Arise Virtual
Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom
as life-long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. The District is ensuring that every
graduate is college and/or career ready.
In November 2020, the District received support from electors in the form of two referenda. The first
provides $22.5 million for safety, security, and facility improvements. The second provides four years of
support in addition to our revenue limit to meet operational needs of the District. The operating
referendum provides an additional $11.5 million for 2023-24 to support:
- ongoing investment in curricular resources such as language arts
- maintain instructional technology for students and staff
- preserve reasonable class sizes
- attract and retain qualified educators and support staff
BUDGET DOCUMENT
The 2024-25 budget is being presented by fund. Prior-year data presented are actual values and not
budgeted amounts. The 2023-24 actual data have been subject to audit, but as of the release of the
budget, are not yet available in report form.
The data presented are not a collection of program-oriented budgets displaying what each program costs,
but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas describing the purpose for which
expenditures are made. This is consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements
(“WUFAR”) structure and the budget presentation format required by §65.90, Wis. Stats. Narrative
explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document to provide additional
context.
The budget is based upon information known and decisions made through October 18, 2024. The October
15 certification of general/equalization aid and related adjustments to the revenue limit computation are
incorporated in to the budget presented here. However, additional modifications to the budget may
occur prior to the budget hearing and levy certification meeting.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving
short-term and long-term strategic direction and the financial health of the District.
On behalf of the entire Business Services Group, we look forward to an exciting and successful school year
in 2024-25.
Dan McCrea, SFO
Chief Financial Officer
Matthew Sylvester-Knudtson, CPA
Director of Finance
Tami Carlson
Financial Analyst / Grants Mgr.
October 18, 2024
District Funds
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally-accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on-going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place
certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund $146,787,035
- Special Education Fund $25,433,544
- Debt Service Funds $8,748,094
- Capital Funds $7,185,323
- Food Service Fund $6,400,000
- Community Svc. Fund $200,000
- All-Fund Expenditures $194,753,996
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures:
Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post-employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
Building the Budget
The budget development process generally begins the December prior to start of the fiscal year and is when budget assumptions are developed based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget and local determinations.
2024-25 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS – APRIL 2024 (ACTUAL in blue)
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process. Additionally, budget assumptions consider the district’s mission driven long-term fiscal health. The following sections provide an overview of the budget development assumptions:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present, and the Board of Education will adopt, a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The district will model the effect of pre-paying (defeasing) its long-term Fund 38 and 39 debt obligations. District Administration will propose defeasing Fund 38 in 2024 and 2025, thereby eliminating Fund 38 WRS Debt.
- The District will secure a line of credit for the 2024-25 fiscal year, related to the historically low November cash point, prior to the December state aid payment.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- Final ESSER III expenses need to be incurred by September 30, 2024.
- Property values are assumed to increase by 3%. Decrease of approximately 2%.
REVENUE
Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2024-25 per pupil categorical aid increase $0.00 per FTE. Unchanged.
State Equalization Aid
- The 2024-25 Statewide General Equalization Aid will increase $225,000,000 over the prior year. Increases in state aid off set the local levy, all else equal. The actual increase for the District is $3,801,723.
Categorical Aid
- Targeted reimbursement for special education funding will remain unchanged from the current legislated amount of approximately 33%. Actual aid received in 2023-24 was 32.4% of prior year expenses.
Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit will increase $325 per FTE. A base FTE, using the September FTE count will be used. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2015 – 9,898
- b. 2016 – 9,780
- c. 2017 – 9,668
- d. 2018 – 9,528
- e. 2019 – 9,370
- f. 2020 – 9,070
- g. 2021 – 9,051
- h. 2022 – 9,108
- i. 2023 – 9,118
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 76. Actual 76.
- Independent Charter School (ICS) membership count is estimated to increase from 25 to 32. Actual 25.5.
- The District will be in year four, $14,500,000, of a four-year non-recurring operational referendum to exceed revenue limit authority.
Open Enrollment / Tuition Programs (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- For budget planning purposes, the District’s September open enrollment-in will remain status quo at 576, net of the 14 JIEP students, and open enrollment-out will remain at 588. Actual open enrollment in as of 3rd Friday is 587 and open enrollment out is 610.
Fund 10 & 27 Grant Revenue, State and Federal Sources
- Federal and State grant award revenue will be budgeted at prior year levels.
EXPENSES
- The District will utilize a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2023-24 expenses, less administrative recommendations.
- The District will forecast a 4.12% increase in base wages, subject to allowable July 1, 2024. CPI-U percentage. The base wage increase amounts to a 3% increase for certified staff totaling $1,572,008.
- The District will budget for a TBD increase in health insurance and model various plan design options designed to recruit and retain talent. Actual approximately 11%.
- The District will budget for a 5% increase in dental insurance.
- The District will budget a 5% increase transportation expenses
- The District will budget a 5% increase in utility expenses.
STAFFING
- Staffing plan assumptions are developed within the guidelines established by Board Policy 4221. In support of district goals, administration may recommend alternative staffing ratios at targeted grade levels.
General Fund (10) Revenues / Expenses
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2022-23 fiscal year to current. Budgeted revenues include approximately $4 million less ESSER and similar funding compared to the prior year, and approximately $2 million more of revenue compared to the prior year due to a new lease in 2024-25. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 2.8%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 58% is derived from state sources and 30% from local sources.
| Revenues by Source | 2022-23 Actual | 2023-24 Actual | 2024-25 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $ 32,581,602 | $42,497,754 | $44,411,808 | $1,914,054 | 4.5% |
| Other School Districts | $4,910,786 | $5,015,103 | $5,228,000 | $212,897 | 4.2% |
| Intermediate | $14,118 | $88,941 | $94,179 | $5,238 | 5.9% |
| State | $79,253,497 | $81,448,316 | $85,172,104 | $3,723,788 | 4.6% |
| Federal | $9,976,463 | $15,003,729 | $9,69.,473 | $(5,310,256) | -35.4% |
| Other | $4,344,850 | $1,230,503 | $2,187,471 | $956,968 | 77.8% |
| Total | $131,081,316 | $145,284,346 | $146,787,035 | $1,502,689 | 1.0% |
Special Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – REVENUES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The projected increase in revenue is due, in part, to some staff costs in being expensed to the IDEA Flow Through grants in 2023-24 and a higher transfer from Fund 10.
| Revenue By source |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfers | $11,794,453 | $12,094,933 | $13,093,724 | $988,791 | 8.3% |
| Other School Districts | 16,340 | 27,146 | 25,000 | (2,146) | -7.9% |
| State | 5,120,965 | 5,558,802 | 5,795,000 | 236,198 | 4.2% |
| Federal | 3,468,703 | 3,475,156 | 3,752,356 | 277,200 | 8.0% |
| Total | $20,400,461 | $21,156,037 | $22,666,080 | $1,510,043 | 7.1% |
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) expenses beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. As noted in the March 2023 staffing report, 4.5 FTE additional instructional special education staff were added.
| Expenses By Function |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $15,133,492 | $15,882,432 | $17,307,757 | $1,425,325 | 9.0% |
| Pupil Services | 2,802,821 | 2,819,576 | 2,719,032 | (100,544) | -3.6% |
| Instructional Staff Serv. | 854,094 | 853,918 | 951,085 | 97,167 | 11-4% |
| General Admin. | 16,570 | 20,362 | 20,000 | (362) | -1.8% |
| Business Admin. | 1,203,886 | 1,172,806 | 1,248,206 | 75,400 | 6.4% |
| Central Services | 16,891 | 16,187 | 25,000 | 8,813 | 54.4% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 239,669 | 390,756 | 395,000 | 4,244 | 1.1% |
| Other Transactions | 133,038 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | $20,400,461 | $21,156,037 | $22,666,080 | $1,510,043 | 7.1% |
General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
GENERAL OPERATING FUNDS (10 AND 27)
Over half of the financial support for special education services is provided via a transfer from the General Fund (10). Because of this reliance, and because special education is a component of the broad instructional services the District provides, these funds are occasionally blended. When done so, the net totals may be considered the District’s operating budget. The values illustrated are net of the inter-fund transfer.
| Revenues: | 2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $33,127,642 | $32,581,602 | $41,804,243 | $9,222,641 | 28.3% |
| Other School Districts | 5,170,719 | 4,937,932 | 5,053,000 | 115,068 | 2.3% |
| Intermediate | 9,400 | 8,000 | 0 | (8,000) | -100.0% |
| State | 81,123,349 | 84,812,299 | 86,812,299 | 1,516,667 | 1.8% |
| Federal | 11,545,303 | 13,451,619 | 19,112,426 | 5,660,807 | 42.1% |
| Other | $137,890,869 | $140,142,420 | $152,559,335 | $12,416,915 | 8.9% |
| Expenses: | 2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $74,044,518 | $79,527,602 | $80,642,769 | $1,115,167 | 1.4% |
| Pupil Services | 7,192,699 | 8,.365,841 | 8,807,629 | 441,788 | 5.3% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 11,430,134 | 9,470,496 | 10,141,754 | 671,258 | 7.1% |
| General Admin. | 799,732 | 660,883 | 676,896 | 16,013 | 2.4% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,619,469 | 6,699,261 | 7,306,901 | 607,640 | 9.1% |
| Central Services | 16,635,686 | 17,497,560 | 24,491,270 | 6,993,710 | 40.0% |
| Insruance & Judgement | 1,678,712 | 1,939,285 | 2,067,673 | 128,388 | 6.6% |
| Debt Service | 919,493 | 927,865 | 1,173,000 | 245,135 | 26.4% |
| Other Support Svcs | 5,407,910 | 2,624,487 | 2,630,000 | 5,513 | 0.2% |
| Transfers | 4,140,859 | 3,109,565 | 3,452,443 | 342,878 | 11.0% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 1,500,000 | 1,160,000 | 2,500,000 | 1,340,000 | 115.5% |
| Other Transactions | 275,083 | 310,029 | 150,000 | (160,029) | -51.6% |
| Total Expenses | $137,056,710 | $139,540,426 | $152,559,335 | $13,018,909 | 9.3% |
| Fund Balance | $24,862,069.69 | $25,464,065.03 | $25,464,065.03 | $0 | 0.0% |
Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the District’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the District’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. In 2019, the District refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis.
Debt service is levied on the calendar year basis, but budgeted for on the fiscal year basis. For 2023-24, a transfer of $2.5 million from Fund 10 is included in the budget. These funds will be used to defease retirement-system related debt. At the end of the 2023-24, the following debt balances will be outstanding. The anticipated 2023- 24 defeasance has not been factored into these balances.
- Act 32 $4,715,000
- Retirement-system $6,270,000
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $2,758,183 | $2,749,068 | $2,755,308 | $6,240 | 0.2% |
| Transfers | 0 | 0 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 0.0% |
| Other Revenue | 1,041 | 25,024 | 20,000 | (5,024) | -20.1 |
| Total Revenue | 2,759,224 | 2,774,092 | 5,275,308 | 2,501,216 | 90.2% |
| Principal | 2,365,000 | 2,415,000 | 4,775,000 | 2,360,000 | 97.7% |
| Interest | 422,313 | 364,053 | 504,083 | 140,030 | 38.5% |
| Total Expenses | 2,787,313 | 2,779,053 | 5,279,083 | 2,500,030 | 90.0% |
| Fund Balance | $782,497.22 | $777,536.59 | $773,761.59 | $(3,775) | -05% |
Fund 39 – Referendum Approved Debt
The District’s Fund 39 debt relates to the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools, and the 2020 capital referendum. The 2023-24 budget does not include an allowance for defeasing Fund 39 debt.
At the end of the 2023-24, the following debt balances will be outstanding.
- 2016 Issuance $4,745,000
- 2020 Issuance $2,585,000
| Fund 39 Non-Referendum Debt |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $13,291,143 | $14,333,123 | $6,858,789 | $(7,474,334) | -52.1% |
| Other Revenue | 934,065 | 77,668 | 70,000 | (7,668) | -9.9% |
| Total Revenue | 14,225,208 | 14,410,791 | 6,928,789 | (7,482,002) | -51.9% |
| Principal | 12,415,900 | 13,663,900 | 6,445,000 | (7,218,900) | -52.8% |
| Interest | 1,226,381 | 976,825 | 551,055 | (425,770) | -43.6% |
| Other | 15,900 | 13,900 | 0 | (13,900) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | 13,958,181, | 14,654,625 | 6,996,055 | (7,658,570) | -52.3% |
| Fund Balance | $659,592.73 | $429,658.65 | $362,392.65 | $(67,266) | -15.7% |
Capital Funds (46 & 49)
Fund 46 – Long-Term Capital Improvement
In 2015, the Board of Education acted to establish a long-term capital improvement fund, which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in this fund is accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 during a given fiscal year or no later than July 30 following fiscal-year-end. Budgeted expenses for 2023-24 relate to capital projects at Edison and Franklin Middle Schools and Craig and Parker High Schools.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Improv. |
20121-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $1,500,000 | $1,160,000 | $0 | $(1,160,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 7,282 | 167,007 | 100,000 | (67,007) | -40.1% |
| Total Revenue | 1,507,282 | 1,327,007 | 100,000 | (1,227,007) | -92.5% |
| Construction- Related | 0 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,00,000 | 0.0% |
| Other | 16,908 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 16,908 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Fund Balance | $11,281,047.74 | $12,676,826.22 | $7,776,826.22 | $(4,900,000) | -38.7% |
Fund 49 – Capital Projects
Upon issuance of the 2020 referendum‐approved debt, a capital projects fund was established to account for the costs associated with those projects.
| Fund 49 Captial Projects |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Revenue | $30,251 | $496,823 | $200,000 | $(296,823) | 59.7% |
| Total Revenue | $30,251 | $496,823 | $200,000 | (296,823) | 59.7% |
| Construction-Related | 9,082,157 | 5,713,070 | 8,061,409 | 2,348,339 | 41.1% |
| Total Expenses | 9,082,157 | 5,713,070 | 8,061,409 | 2,348,339 | 41.1% |
| Fund Balance | $13,077,656.38 | $7,861,409.59 | $0.59 | $(7,861,409) | -100.0% |
Food Service
The District self-operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program.
Included in the Fund 50 budget is an approximately 5.7% market adjustment to wages ($67,000 including FICA and WRS) for specific student nutrition staff groups.
| Fund 50 Food Service |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Sales | $418,543 | $1,007,193 | $1,000,000 | $ (7,193) | -0.7% |
| State | 0 | 80,081 | 77,000 | (3,081) | -3.8% |
| Federal | 6,905,577 | 5,427,261 | 4,993,000 | (434,261) | -8.0% |
| Other Revenue | 26,450 | 123,999 | 80,000 | (43,999) | -35.5% |
| Total Revenue | 7,350,570 | 6,638,534 | 6,150,000 | (488,534) | -7.4% |
| Maintenance/ Facilities | 66,683 | 33,312 | 33,077 | (235) | -0.7% |
| Food Service | 5,605,004 | 5,851,825 | 6,059,935 | 208,110 | 3-.6% |
| Internal Services | 46,416 | 47,540 | 51,988 | 4,448 | 9.4% |
| Other | 7,779 | 6,360 | 5,000 | (1,360) | 3.6% |
| Total Expenses | $5,725,882 | $5,939,037 | $6,150,000 | $210,963 | 3.6% |
| Fund Balance | $3,288,940.09 | $3,988,437.04 | $3,988,437.04 | $0 | 0.0% |
Employee Benefits Trust Fund
The District established Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post-employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. The District, generally, makes both annual contributions to and withdrawals from the fund. The District’s expenses related to post-employment benefits are decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits. As a fiduciary fund, a budget is not required to be established for Fund 73.
| Fund 73 OPEB Trust |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Contributions | $3,500,000 | $2,677,573 | $0 | $(2,677,573) | -100.0% |
| Retiree Contributions | 114,014 | 161,031 | 0 | (161,031) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 5,696 | 198,832 | 0 | (198,832) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 3,619,710 | 3,037,436 | 0 | (3,037,436) | -100.0% |
| Benefits Paid | 1,202,439 | 1,395,719 | 0 | (2,200,395) | -100.0% |
| Implicit Rate Subsidy | 649,154 | 804,676 | 0 | (804,676) | -100.0% |
| Other | 10,417 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $1,862,010 | $2,200,395 | $0 | $(2,200,395) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $8,250,697.65 | $9,087,738.31 | $9,087,738.31 | $0 | 0.0% |
Special Revenue Trust Fund
Fund 21 accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
As donations and expenditures are not always known, a budget is not established for Fund 21.
| Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donations | $527,529 | $533,108 | $0 | $(533,108) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 419,828 | 231,331 | 0 | (231,331) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 947,357 | 764,439 | 0 | (764,439) | -100.0% |
| Instructional | 459,058 | 588,670 | 0 | (588,670) | -100.0% |
| Support Services | 81,924 | 588,670 | 0 | (102,623) | -100.0% |
| Scholarships | 14,003 | 17,798 | 0 | (102,623) | -100.0% |
| Other | 16,419 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 571,404 | 691,293 | 0 | (691,293) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $1,053,552.45 | $1,108,901.46 | $1,108,901.460 | $0 | 0.0% |
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND (80)
In 2019, the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy utilizing a
Fund 80 levy as a financial vehicle. For 2023-24, the levy includes $25,000 in support of Bags of
Hope staff. A substantial amount of revenue, via donations, flow through Fund 80 to support
community programs (e.g., Bags of Hope).
| Fund 80 Community Service |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $175,00 | $175,000 | $200,000 | $25,000 | 14.3% |
| Donations | 150,345 | 151,487 | 0 | (151,487) | -100% |
| Total Revenue | 325,345 | 326,487 | 200,000 | (126,487) | -38.7% |
| Early Literacy | 89,683 | 151,393 | 175,000 | 23,061 | 15.2% |
| Bags of Hope | 118,506 | 122,417 | 25,000 | (74,356) | -27.1% |
| Total Expenses | 208,189 | 274,356 | 200,000 | (74,356) | -27.1% |
| Fund Balance | $261,346.11 | $313,477.64 | $313,477.64 | $0 | 0.0% |
Enrollment & Membership
All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count generates a membership count of students actively attending the School District of Janesville or any other public school (“Members”). This count is used to calculate the District’s revenue limit, by factoring the full-time equivalency (FTE) of each student (“Membership FTE”). Enrollment represents the headcount of students attending any school within the District, regardless of school district residency.
Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value. The following chart illustrates the September enrollment, members, and membership FTE. Summer school FTE is not included.
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | 10,385 | 10,310 | 10,275 | 10,146 | 10,063 |
| Members | 10,263 | 10,165 | 10,039 | 9,935 | 9,825 |
| Membership FTE | 9,992 | 9,898 | 9,780 | 9,668 | 9,528 |
Revenue Limit Authority
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a three year rolling average
Base revenue is key to a District’s long-term financial health. One of the best comparable data points between and among school districts is base revenue (line seven of the revenue limit worksheet). The District’s base revenue has been decreasing over time as non-recurring exemptions expire. The uptick for 2023-24 relates to the low revenue limit ceiling increasing to $11,000 per member, up from $10,000. The District’s need to seek an operating referendum was a direct result of decreasing membership and decreasing base revenue, each of which are factored into the District’s financial forecast model.
Property Tax Information
The District’s property tax is frequently measured in an amount per $1,000 of property value (milrate). The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2014-15. The recent mil rate reductions are due, in part, to a higher-than-average increase in equalized property values.
2022-23 ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
Historically, the School Districts of Janesville and Milton have had the lowest rates in Rock County. Milton had not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018-19 to 2019-20. Prior year data is illustrated as current year mil rates have not yet been set.
Tax Levy
The District’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the District. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and by municipality.
| Levy (By Fund) |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Fund | $30,751,626 | $29,733,685 | $40,412,701 | $10,679,016 | 35.9% |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | 2,758,183 | 1,749,068 | 2,755,308 | 6,240 | 0.2% |
| Referendum, Debt. Svc | 13,291,143 | 14,333,123 | 6,858,789 | (7,474,334) | -52.1% |
| Community Sercices | 175,000 | 175,000 | 200,000 | 25,000 | 14.3% |
| Chargeback | 18,752 | 3,828 | 1,002 | (2,826) | -73.8% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704 | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $3,233,096 | 6.9% |
| Levy (By Municipality) |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Janesville | $42,674,714 | $42,724,866 | $45,626,026 | $2,901,160 | 6.8% |
| Town of Harmony | 7,669 | 7,334 | 7,879 | 545 | 7.4% |
| Town of Janesville | 1,990,918 | 2,063,704 | 2,157,649 | 93,945 | 4.6% |
| Town of La Prairie | 494,651 | 444,105 | 517,059 | 72,954 | 16.4% |
| Town of Rock | 1,826,752 | 1,754,695 | 1,919,187 | 164,492 | 9.4% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704.00 | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $3,233,096 | 6.9% |
Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
Budget Book 2023-24
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2023-24
- School District of Janesville
- Introduction / District Overview
- District Funds
- Building the Budget
- General Fund (10) Revenues
- Special Education
- General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
- Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
- Capital Funds (46 & 49)
- Food Service
- Employee Benefits Trust Fund
- Special Revenue Trust Fund
- Enrollment & Membership
- Revenue Limit Authority
- Property Tax Information
- Tax Levy
- Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
School District of Janesville
Introduction / District Overview
NTRODUCTION
The Business Services Group is pleased to present the 2023-24 School District of Janesville (“SDJ”) budget.
A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 24, 2023. As a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the District is receiving federal grants to support its response. The
District is using funds to offer a robust online instruction platform, reduce class size at the elementary
level, maintain secondary instructional pathways, invest in sanitation efforts, install bottle filling stations,
provide personal protective equipment such as face masks, and improve indoor air quality. In aggregate,
the District will receive over $27 million in federal funding through three different Elementary and
Secondary School Emergency Relief (“ESSER”) and Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (“GEER”)
Funds. The funds are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis, meaning the District must incur costs and
then be reimbursed. Some of these funds are received by the District and are required to be allocated to
private schools. Some of these federal funds were used during the 2020-21 through 2022-23 fiscal years,
and most of the remainder will be used during the 2023-24 fiscal year. A portion may carryover to fiscal
year 2024-25. Of the remaining funds, a portion will be used for indoor air quality at Franklin Middle
School and social distancing in greenhouses at Craig and Parker High Schools.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves over 9,300 pre-kindergarten through 12th grade students in 20
schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are
provided in two comprehensive high schools (9-12), three middle schools (6-8), twelve elementary schools
(K-5), and twelve P4J Community Partnership sites (4-year-old early learners). In addition, we serve
students in three charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, and Arise Virtual
Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom
as life-long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. The District is ensuring that every
graduate is college and/or career ready.
In November 2020, the District received support from electors in the form of two referenda. The first
provides $22.5 million for safety, security, and facility improvements. The second provides four years of
support in addition to our revenue limit to meet operational needs of the District. The operating
referendum provides an additional $11.5 million for 2023-24 to support:
- ongoing investment in curricular resources such as language arts
- maintain instructional technology for students and staff
- preserve reasonable class sizes
- attract and retain qualified educators and support staff
BUDGET DOCUMENT
The 2023-24 budget is being presented by fund. Prior-year data presented are actual values and not
budgeted amounts. The 2022-23 actual data have been subject to audit, but as of the release of the
budget, are not yet available in report form.
The data presented are not a collection of program-oriented budgets displaying what each program costs,
but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas describing the purpose for which
expenditures are made. This is consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements
(“WUFAR”) structure and the budget presentation format required by §65.90, Wis. Stats. Narrative
explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document to provide additional
context.
The budget is based upon information known and decisions made through October 19, 2023. The October
15 certification of general/equalization aid and related adjustments to the revenue limit computation are
incorporated in to the budget presented here. However, additional modifications to the budget may
occur prior to the budget hearing and levy certification meeting.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving
short-term and long-term strategic direction and the financial health of the District.
On behalf of the entire Business Services Group, we look forward to an exciting and successful school year
in 2023-24.
Dan McCrea, SFO
Chief Financial Officer
Matthew Sylvester-Knudtson, CPA
Director of Finance
Tami Carlson
Financial Analyst / Grants Mgr.
District Funds
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally-accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on-going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place
certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund $142,986,979
- Special Education Fund $22,666,080
- Debt Service Funds $12,275,138
- Capital Funds $13,061,409
- Food Service Fund $6,150,000
- Community Svc. Fund $200,000
- All-Fund Expenditures $197,339,606
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures: Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post-employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
Building the Budget
The budget development process generally begins the December prior to start of the fiscal year and is when budget assumptions are developed based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget and local determinations.
2023-24 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS – APRIL 2023 (ACTUAL)
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process. Budget planning will remain conservative student enrollment (all students) and full time equivalent for resident students.
Planning for the district’s 2023-24 budget is a challenge because of the unknowns related to the State’s 2023-25 biennial budget cycle, which begins on July 1 but is not yet legislated nor signed by the Governor. There are many elements within the biennial budget which have a direct impact on Wisconsin school districts; there are three to highlight: 1) allowable increases in revenue limit authority, 2) equalization aid, and 3) the level of special education reimbursement. Each of the three highlighted elements may or may not impact the district’s budget. District administration will model various scenarios.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present, and the Board of Education will adopt, a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The District will model the mil rate effect of pre-paying (defeasing) its long-term Fund 39 debt obligation.
- The District will secure a line of credit for the 2023-24 fiscal year, related to the historically low November cash point, prior to the December state aid payment.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- ESSER III, or any federal pandemic relief provided to the district, will be used to supplement rather than supplant district expenses.
- Property values are assumed to increase by 2%.
- REVENUE Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2023-24 per pupil categorical aid increase $100 per FTE. No increase afforded in the biennial budget.
- State Equalization Aid
- The 2023-24 General Equalization Aid will be comparable to the prior year. The actual increase is $2,070,505.
Categorical Aid
- Reimbursement for special education funding will be modeled at 35%. The estimated reimbursement rate is 33% of prior year eligible costs.
Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit increase will be modeled at various amounts per FTE. A base FTE, using the September FTE count will be used. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2016 – 9,780
- b. 2017 – 9,668
- c. 2018 – 9,528
- d. 2019 – 9,370
- e. 2020 – 9,070
- f. 2021 – 9,051
- g. 2022 – 9,108
- h. 2023 – 9,111 Actual 9,108
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 85.
Actual 76.
- Independent Charter School (ICS) membership count is estimated to remain at the September 2022 value of 17. Actual 24.6.
- The district will be in year three ($11,500,000) of a four-year non-recurring operational referendum to exceed revenue limit authority. As a step referendum, year three represents a $4,000,000 increase. In terms of overall revenue limit authority, it should be noted that fluctuating membership impacts the district’s final, September 2023, revenue limit authority.
Open Enrollment / Tuition Programs (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- For budget planning purposes, the district’s September open enrollment-in will remain status quo at $4,950,000 and open enrollment-out expenses will remain at $4,450,000. Budgeted open enrollment revenue is $5,000,000 with expenses budgeted at $5,200,000.
- Janesville International Exchange Program (JIEP) will initially be budgeted at $503,000 revenue. The actual JIEP budget reflects equal revenues and expenses.
Fund 10 & 27 Grant Revenue, State and Federal Sources
- Exclusive of ESSER funding, Federal and State grant award revenue will be budgeted at prior year levels.
Parker Arts Academy
- Private funding for the Parker Arts Academy concluded during the 2022-23 year.
EXPENSES
- The District will utilize a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2022-23 expenses, less administrative recommendations.
- The district will forecast scenarios relative to the district’s obligation to bargain in good faith subject to the allowable July 1, 2023, CPI-U base wage percentage increase.
- The District will budget for a 9% increase in health insurance. Actual approx. 1%.
- The District will budget for a 0% increase in dental insurance.
- The District will budget a 5.0% increase transportation expenses
- The District will budget a $150,000 increase in utility expenses.
STAFFING
- The 2023-2024 staffing plan outcomes, BOE adopted on March 28, 2023, are factored within the budget developed to date.
General Fund (10) Revenues
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to current. District revenues include approximately $6 million additional ESSER and similar funding compared to the prior year, and approximately $3.7 million less of revenue compared to the prior year due to a new lease in 2022-23. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 7.8%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 56% is derived from state sources and 29% from local sources.
| Revenues (By Source) | 2021 - 22 Actual | 2022-23 Actual | 2023-24 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $33,127,642 | $32,581,602 | $41,804,243 | $9,222,641 | 28.3% |
| Other School Districts | 5,154,379 | 4,910,786 | 5,028,000 | 117,214 | 2.4% |
| Intermediate | 9,400 | 8,000 | 0 | (8,000) | -100.0% |
| State | 76,002,384 | 79,253,497 | 80,533,966 | 1,280,469 | 1.6% |
| Federal | 8,076,600 | 9,976,463 | 15,360,070 | 5,383,607 | 54.0% |
| Other | 6,914,456 | 4,350,968 | 260,700 | (4,090,268) | -94% |
| Total | $129,284,861 | $131,081,316 | $142,986,979 | $11,905,663 | 9.1% |
GENERAL FUND (10) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) expenses beginning with the 2022-23 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. Compared to the prior year, expenses decreased by approximately $4 million due to ESSER and similar funding, and increased by approximately $2 million due to a new lease in 2024-25. In absence of these two items, expenses would have increased approximately 3.5%.
| Expenses (By Function) | 2022-23 Actual | 2023-24 Actual | 20224-25 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $63,645,170 | $61,665,219 | $66,511,507 | $4,846,288 | 7.9% |
| Pupil Services | 5,546,265 | 5,747,519 | 5,305,463 | (422,056) | -7.7% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 8,616,578 | 8,860,148 | 9,374,675 | 514,527 | 5.8% |
| General Admin | 640,521 | 615,672 | 715,484 | 99,812 | 16.2% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,699,261 | 7,200,777 | 7,430,482 | 229,705 | 3.2% |
| Buisness Admin. | 16,324,754 | 25,139,731 | 23,197,652 | (1,942,079) | -7.7% |
| Central Services | 1,923,098 | 1,941,756 | 2,097,586 | 155,830 | 8.0% |
| Insurance & Judgmt. | 927,865 | 995,094 | 1,428,000 | 432,906 | 43.5% |
| Debt. Service | 2,624,487 | 1,705,053 | 2,635,000 | 929,947 | 54.5% |
| Other Support Svcs. | 3,109,565 | 4,411,332 | 3,353,423 | (1,057,909) | -24.0% |
| Transfers | 13,254,933 | 18,190,883 | 15,643,313 | (2,547,570) | -14.0% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts | 6,856,796 | 7,825,464 | 8,944,450 | 1,118,986 | 14.3% |
| Other Transactions | 310,029 | 83,780 | 150,000 | 66,220 | 79.0% |
| Total | 130,479,322 | 144,382,428 | 146,787,035 | 2,404,607 | 1.7% |
| Fund Balance | $25,464,065.03 | $26,365,985.05 | $26,365,985.05 | - | 0.0% |
Special Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – REVENUES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2022-23 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The projected increase in revenue is due, in part, to some staff costs in being expensed to ESSER and the IDEA Flow Through grants and a higher transfer from Fund 10.
| Revenue By source |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfers | $12,094,933 | $13,719,346 | $15,643,313 | $1,923,967 | 14% |
| Local | - | 1,960 | - | (1,960) | -100% |
| Other School Districts | 27,146 | 7,040 | 7,000 | () | % |
| State | 5,558,802 | 5,942,159 | 6,080,000 | 137,841 | 2.3% |
| Federal | 3,475,156 | 3,029,128 | 3,703,231 | 674,103 | 22.3% |
| Total | $21,156,037 | $22,699,633 | $25,433,544 | $2,733,911 | 12.0% |
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) expenses beginning with the 2022-23 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. Increases in cost are primarily driven by increased staffing levels and budgeting for exposure, including positions vacant at this time
| Expenses By Function |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $15,882,432 | $17,074,998 | $19,321,384 | $2,246,386 | 13.2% |
| Pupil Services | 2,819,576 | 2,923,619 | 3,204,975 | 281,356 | 9.6% |
| Instructional Staff Serv. | 853,918 | 942,894 | 992,230 | 49,336 | 5.2% |
| General Admin. | 20,362 | 11,156 | 20,000 | 8,844 | 79.3% |
| Business Admin. | 1,172,806 | 1,263,950 | 1,349,955 | 86,005 | 6.8% |
| Central Services | 16,187 | 15,555 | 25,000 | 9,445 | 60.7% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 390,756 | 467,461 | 520,000 | 52,539 | 11.2% |
| Total | $21,156,037 | $22,699,633 | $25,433,544 | $2,733,911 | 12.0% |
General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
GENERAL OPERATING FUNDS (10 AND 27)
Over half of the financial support for special education services is provided via a transfer from the General Fund (10). Because of this reliance, and because special education is a component of the broad instructional services the District provides, these funds are occasionally blended. When done so, the net totals may be considered the District’s operating budget. The values illustrated are net of the inter-fund transfer.
| Revenues: | 2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $32,581,602 | $42,499,714 | $44,411,808 | $1,912,094 | 4.5% |
| Other School Districts | 4,937,932 | 5,022,143 | 5,235,000 | 212,857 | 4.2% |
| Intermediate | 14,118 | 88,941 | 94,179 | 5,238 | 5.9% |
| State | 84,812,299 | 87,390,475 | 91,252,104 | 3,861,629 | 4.4% |
| Federal | 13,451,619 | 18,032,857 | 13,396,704 | (4,636,153) | -25.7% |
| Other | 4,344,850 | 1,230,503 | 2,187,471 | 956,968 | 77.8% |
| Total Revenues | $140,142,420 | $154,264,633 | $156,577,266 | $2,312,633 | 1.5% |
| Expenses: | 2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $79,527,602 | $78,740,217 | $85,832,891 | $7,092,674 | 9.0% |
| Pupil Services | 8,365,841 | 8,671,138 | 8,510,438 | (160,700) | -1.9% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 9,470,496 | 9,803,042 | 10,366,905 | 563,863 | 5.8% |
| General Admin. | 660,883 | 626,828 | 735,484 | 108,656 | 17.3% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,699,261 | 7,200,777 | 7,430,482 | 229,705 | 3.2% |
| Central Services | 17,497,560 | 26,403,681 | 24,547,607 | (1,856,074) | -7.0% |
| Insruance & Judgement | 927,865 | 995,094 | 1,428,000 | 432,906 | 43.5% |
| Debt Service | 2,624,487 | 1,705,053 | 2,635,000 | 929,947 | 54.5% |
| Other Support Svcs | 3,109,565 | 4,411,332 | 3,353,423 | (1,057,909) | -24.0% |
| Transfers | 1,160,000 | 4,471,537 | - | (4,471,537) | -100.0% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 7,247,552 | 8,292,925 | 9,464,450 | 1,171,525 | 14.1% |
| Other Transactions | 310,029 | 83,780 | 150,000 | 66,110 | 79.0% |
| Total Expenses | $139,540,426 | $153,362,715 | $156,577,266 | $3,214,551 | 2.1% |
| Fund Balance | $25,464,065.03 | $26,365,985.05 | $26,365,985.05 | - | 0.0% |
Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the District’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the District’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. In 2019, the District refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis.
During 2023-24, the District defeased $5,275,000 of principal related to the retirement-system debt.
Debt service is levied on the calendar year basis, but budgeted for on the fiscal year basis.
At the end of the 2024-25 fiscal year, the following debt balances will be outstanding.
- Act 32 $3,185,000
- Retirement-system $0
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $2,749,068 | $2,755,308 | $2,645,303 | $(110,005) | -4.0% |
| Transfers | - | 4,221,537 | - | (4,221,537) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 25,024 | 40,041 | 20,000 | (20,041) | -50.1% |
| Total Revenue | 2,774,092 | 7,016,886 | 2,665,303 | (4,351,583) | -62.0% |
| Principal | 2,415,000 | 7,766,650 | 2,525,000 | (5,241,650) | -67.5% |
| Interest | 364,053 | 304,083 | 200,784 | (103,289) | -34.0% |
| Total Expenses | 2,779,053 | 8,070,733 | 2,725,794 | (5,344,939) | -66.2% |
| Fund Balance | $777,536.59 | $131,003.51 | $70,512,51 | ($60,491) | -46.2% |
Fund 39 – Referendum Approved Debt
The District’s Fund 39 debt relates to the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools, and the 2020 capital referendum. The 2023-24 budget does not include an allowance for defeasing Fund 39 debt.
At the end of the 2024-25 fiscal year, the following debt balances will be outstanding.
- 2016 Issuance $1,300,000
- 2020 Issuance $295,000
| Fund 39 Non-Referendum Debt |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $14,333,123 | $6,858,789 | $5,966,749 | $(892,040) | -13.0% |
| Other Revenue | 77,668 | 20,606 | 10,000 | (10,606) | -51.5% |
| Total Revenue | 14,410,791 | 6,879,395 | 5,976,749 | (902,646) | -13.1% |
| Principal | 13,663,900 | 6,445,000 | 5,735,000 | (710,000) | -11.0% |
| Interest | 976,825 | 55,055 | 287,300 | (263,755) | -47.9% |
| Other | 13,900 | - | - | - | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 14,654,625 | 6,996,055 | 6,022,300 | (973,755) | -13.9% |
| Fund Balance | $429,658.65 | $312,998.39 | $267,447.39 | $(45,551) | -14.6% |
Capital Funds (46 & 49)
Fund 46 – Long-Term Capital Improvement
In 2015, the Board of Education acted to establish a long-term capital improvement fund, which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in this fund is accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 during a given fiscal year or no later than July 30 following fiscal-year-end. Expenses for 2023-24 related to capital projects at Edison and Franklin Middle Schools and Craig and Parker High Schools.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Improv. |
20122-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $1,160,000 | $250,000 | $- | $(250,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 167,007 | 436,299 | 200,000 | (236,299) | -54.2% |
| Total Revenue | 1,327,007 | 686,299 | 200,000 | (486,299) | -70.9% |
| Construction- Related | - | 2,744,966 | - | (2,744,966) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | - | 2,744,966 | - | (2,744,966) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $12,676,826.22 | $10,707,566.60 | $10,907,566.60 | $200,000 | 1.9% |
Fund 49 – Capital Projects
Upon issuance of the 2020 referendum-approved debt, a capital projects fund was established to account for the costs associated with those projects.
| Fund 49 Captial Projects |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Revenue | $496,823 | $275,921 | $100,000 | $(175,921) | -63.8% |
| Total Revenue | 496,823 | 275,921 | 100,000 | (175,921) | -63.8% |
| Construction-Related | 5,713,070 | 1,052,007 | 7,185,323 | 6,133,316 | 583.0% |
| Total Expenses | 5,713,070 | 1,052,007 | 7,185,323 | 6,133,316 | 583.0% |
| Fund Balance | $7,861,409.59 | $7,085,323.83 | $.83 | $(7,085,323) | -100.0% |
Food Service
The District self-operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program.
| Fund 50 Food Service |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Sales | $1,007,193 | $961,553 | $950,000 | $ (11,553) | -1.2% |
| State | 80,081 | 97,358 | 80,000 | (17,358) | -17.8% |
| Federal | 5,427,261 | 5,444,309 | 5,290,000 | (154,309) | -2.8% |
| Other Revenue | 123,999 | 186,043 | 80,000 | (106,043) | -57.0% |
| Total Revenue | 6,638,534 | 6,689,263 | 6,400,000 | (289,263) | -4.3% |
| Maintenance/ Facilities | 33,312 | 26,937 | 30,844 | 3,907 | 14.5% |
| Food Service | 5,851,825 | 6,357,502 | 6,261,786 | (95,716) | -1.5% |
| Internal Services | 47,540 | 50,011 | 52,370 | 2,359 | 4.7% |
| Other | 6,360 | 24,519 | 55,000 | 30,481 | 124.3% |
| Total Expenses | $5,939,037 | $6,458,969 | $6,400,000 | $(58,969) | -09% |
| Fund Balance | $3,988,437.04 | $4,218,731.23 | $4,218,731.23 | $- | 0% |
Employee Benefits Trust Fund
The District established Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post-employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. The District, generally, makes both annual contributions to and withdrawals from the fund. The District’s expenses related to post-employment benefits are decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits.
As a fiduciary fund, a budget is not required to be established for Fund 73.
| Fund 73 OPEB Trust |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Contributions | $2,724,590 | $2,650,000 | $0 | $(2,650,000) | -100.0% |
| Retiree Contributions | 114,014 | 185,807 | - | (185,807) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 198,832 | 405,006 | - | (405,006) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 3,037,436 | 3,240,813 | - | (3,240,813) | -100.0% |
| Benefits Paid | 1,395,719 | 1,374,989 | - | (1,374,989) | -100.0% |
| Implicit Rate Subsidy | 804,676 | 838,574 | - | (2,213,563) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | $2,200,385 | $2,213,563 | $0 | $(2,213,563) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $9,087,738.31 | $10,114,988.79 | $10,114,988.79 | $0 | 0.0% |
Special Revenue Trust Fund
Fund 21 accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
As donations and expenditures are not always known, a budget is not established for Fund 21.
| Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donations | $533,180 | $651,071 | $0 | $(651,071) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 231,331 | 218,396 | 0 | (218,396) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 764,439 | 869,467 | 0 | (869,467) | -100.0% |
| Instructional | 588,670 | 639,398 | 0 | (639,398) | -100.0% |
| Support Services | 102,623 | 89,266 | 0 | (89,266) | -100.0% |
| Scholarships | 17,798 | 29,867 | 0 | (29,867) | -100.0% |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 709,091 | 758,531 | 0 | (758,531) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $1,108,901.46 | $1,219,839.39 | $1,219,837.39 | $0 | 0.0% |
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND (80)
In 2019, the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy utilizing a Fund 80 levy as a financial vehicle. For 2023-24, the levy includes $25,000 in support of Bags of Hope staff. A substantial amount of revenue, via donations, flow through Fund 80 to support community programs (e.g., Bags of Hope).
| Fund 80 Community Service |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $175,000 | $200,000 | $175,000 | $(25,000) | -12.5% |
| Donations | 151,487 | 133,902 | 0 | (133,902) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 326,487 | 333,902 | 175,000 | (158,902) | -47.6% |
| Early Literacy | 151,939 | 170,140 | 0 | (170,140) | -100.0% |
| Bags of Hope | 122,417 | 135,445 | 0 | (135,455) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | 384,823 | 424,375 | 200,000 | (224,375) | -52.9% |
| Fund Balance | $313,477.64 | $341,494.60 | $316,494.60 | $(25,000.00) | -7.3% |
Enrollment & Membership
All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count generates a membership count of students actively attending the School District of Janesville or any other public school (“Members”). This count is used to calculate the District’s revenue limit, by factoring the full-time equivalency (FTE) of each student (“Membership FTE”). Enrollment represents the headcount of students attending any school within the District, regardless of school district residency.
Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value. The following chart illustrates the September enrollment, members, and membership FTE. Summer school FTE is not included.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | 10,310 | 10,275 | 10,146 | 10,063 | 9,898 |
| Members | 10,165 | 10,039 | 9,935 | 9,825 | 9,643 |
| Membership FTE | 9,898 | 9,780 | 9,668 | 9,528 | 9,370 |
Revenue Limit Authority
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The
following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has
operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a threeyear
rolling average.
following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has
operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a threeyear
rolling average.
Base revenue is key to a District’s long-term financial health. One of the best comparable data points between and among school districts is base revenue (line seven of the revenue limit worksheet). The District’s base revenue has been decreasing over time as non-recurring exemptions expire. The uptick for 2023-24 relates to the low revenue limit ceiling increasing to $11,000 per member, up from $10,000 and increased for 2024-25 due to a State-afforded increase of $325.
The District’s need to seek an operating referendum was a direct result of decreasing membership and decreasing base revenue, each of which are factored into the District’s financial forecast model.
Property Tax Information
The District’s property tax is frequently measured in an amount per $1,000 of property value (mil rate). The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2015-16. The recent mil rate reductions are due, in part, to a higher-than-average increase in equalized property values.
2023‐24 ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
Historically, the School Districts of Janesville and Milton have had the lowest rates in Rock County. Milton had not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018‐19 to 2019‐20. Prior year data is illustrated as current year mil rates have not yet been set.
Tax Levy
The District’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the District. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and by municipality.
| Levy (By Fund) |
Actual |
|---|---|
| General Fund | $42,767,013 |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | 2,645,303 |
| Referendum, Debt. Svc | 6,076,882 |
| Community Sercices | 175,000 |
| Chargeback | 4,162 |
| Levy (By Fund) |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Actual |
2024-25 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genral Fund | $29,733,685 | $40,412,701 | $42,767,013 | $2,354,312 | 5.8% |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | 2,719,068 | 2,755,308 | 2,645,303 | (110,005) | -4.0% |
| Referendum Debt Svc | 14,333,123 | 6,858,789 | 6,076,882 | (781,907) | -11.4% |
| Community Service | 175,000 | 200,000 | 175,000 | (25,000) | -12.5% |
| Chargebacks | 3,828 | 1,002 | 4,162 | 3,160 | 315.4% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $51,668,360 | $1,440,560 | 2.9% |
Levy by
(By Municipality)
Actual
Actual
Budget
Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
Budget Book 2022-23
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2022-2023
- School District of Janesville
- Introduction / District Overview
- Budget Document
- District Funds
- Building the Budget
- General Fund (10) Revenues
- Special Education
- General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
- Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
- Capital Funds (46 & 49)
- Food Service
- Employee Benefits Trust Fund
- Special Revenue Trust Fund
- Enrollment & Membership
- Revenue Limit Authority
- Property Tax Information
- 2022-23 Tax Levy
- Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
School District of Janesville
Introduction / District Overview
INTRODUCTION
The Business Services Group is pleased to present the 2022‐23 School District of Janesville (“SDJ”) budget. A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 25, 2022. As a result of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the District is receiving federal grants to support its response. The District is using funds to offer a robust online instruction platform, reduce class size at the elementary level, maintain secondary instructional pathways, invest in sanitation efforts, install bottle filling stations, provide personal protective equipment such as face masks, and improve indoor air quality. In aggregate, the District will receive over $27 million in federal funding through three different Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (“ESSER”) and Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (“GEER”) Funds. The funds are provided on a cost‐reimbursement basis, meaning the District must incur costs and then be reimbursed. Some of these funds are received by the District and are required to be allocated to private schools. Some of these federal funds were used during the 2020‐21 and 2021‐22 fiscal years,some will be used during the 2022‐23 fiscal year, and remaining funds will be carried forward to future fiscal years.
During the 2021‐22 school year, in response to COVD‐19 and the use of ESSER II and III, the District engaged stakeholders, and evaluated and prioritized options for the use of the provided funding. COVID‐ 19 response funding is broadly targeted towards:
- Preparedness and Response to COVID 19
- Addressing Long‐Term School Closure
- Educational Technology
- Outreach & Service Delivery to Special Populations
- Addressing Afterschool and Summer Learning
- Mental Health Service and Supports
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves over 9,400 pre‐kindergarten through 12th grade students in 21 schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are provided in two comprehensive high schools(9‐12), three middle schools(6‐8), twelve elementary schools (K‐5), and twelve P4J Community Partnership sites (4‐year‐old early learners). In addition, we serve students in four charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, TAGOS Leadership Academy, and Arise Virtual Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom as life‐long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. The District is ensuring that every graduate is college and/or career ready.
In November 2020, the District received support from electors in the form of two referenda. The first provides $22.5 million for safety, security, and facility improvements. The second provides four years of support in addition to our revenue limit to meet operational needs of the District. The operating referendum provides an additional $7.5 million for 2022‐23 to support:
- ongoing investment in curricular resources such as language arts
- maintain instructional technology for students and staff
- preserve reasonable class sizes
- attract and retain qualified educators and support staff
Budget Document
The 2022‐23 budget is being presented by fund. Prior‐year data presented are actual values and not budgeted amounts. The 2021‐22 actual data have been subject to audit, but as of the release of the budget, are not yet available in report form.
The data presented are not a collection of program‐oriented budgets displaying what each program costs, but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas describing the purpose for which expenditures are made. Thisis consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements (“WUFAR”) structure and the budget presentation format required by §65.90, Wis. Stats. Narrative explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document to provide additional context.
The budget is based upon information known and decisions made through October 17, 2022. The October 15 certification of general/equalization aid and related adjustments to the revenue limit computation are incorporated in to the budget presented here.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving short‐term and long‐term strategic direction and the financial health of the District.
On behalf of the entire Business Services Group, we look forward to an exciting and successful school year in 2022‐23
Dan McCrea, SFO
Chief Financial Officer
Matthew Sylvester-Knudtson, CPA
Director of Finance
Tami Carlson
Financial Analyst / Grants Mgr.
District Funds
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally‐accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on‐going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund (Fund 10) $137,336,796
- Special Education Fund (Fund 27) $21,828,488
- Debt Service Funds (Funds 38 & 39) $17,197,863
- Capital Funds (Funds 46 & 49) $8,152,656
- Food Service Fund (Fund 50) $5,500,000
- Community Service Fund (Fund 80) $175,000
- All-Fund Expenditures $190,190,803
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures:
Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post‐employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District
Building the Budget
The budget development process generally begins the December prior to start of the fiscal year and is when budget assumptions are developed based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget and local determinations. The 2022‐23 budget represents the second year of the State’s 2021‐23 biennial budget. Through this budget, the District will not realize a change in per‐pupil revenue limit or per‐pupil adjustment aid.
2022‐23 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process. Budget planning during a pandemic will remain conservative, in particular, student enrollment (all students) and full time equivalent for resident students.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present and the Board of Education will adopt a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The District will model the mil rate effect of pre‐paying (defeasing) its long‐term Fund 39 debt obligation.
- The District willsecure a line of credit for the 2022‐23 fiscal year, related to the historically low November cash point, prior to the December state aid payment.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- ESSER grants provided to the district, will be used to supplement rather than supplant district expenses.
REVENUE
Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2022‐23 per pupil categorical aid increase $0.00 per FTE. State Equalization Aid
- The 2022‐23 General Equalization Aid increase for the District will be $0.00. Categorical Aid
- Reimbursement for special education funding will remain unchanged from the current prorated amount of approximately 30%.
Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit increase will be $0.00 per FTE. A base FTE, using the September FTE count will be used. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2016 – 9,780
- b. 2017 – 9,668
- c. 2018 – 9,528
- d. 2019 – 9,365
- e. 2020 – 9,070
- f. 2021 – 9,051
- g. 2021 – 9,051 – assumption
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 79.
- The district will be in year two of a four‐year non‐recurring operational referendum to exceed revenue limit authority, which will provide $4,000,000 of additional grossrevenue limit authority compared to the prior year (for a total of $7,500,000). The actual amount realized will be less due to declining student membership.
Open Enrollment / Tuition Programs (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- For budget planning purposes, the District’s open enrollment‐in will maintain a net open enrollment in amount similar to the prior year.
- Janesville International Exchange Program (JIEP) will initially be budgeted at prior year enrollment levels.
Fund 10 & 27 Grant Revenue, State and Federal Sources
- Federal and State grant award revenue will be budgeted at prior year level
EXPENSES
- The District will utilize a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2022‐23 expenses.
- The District will budget for a 4.7% increase in base wages, subject to the allowable July 1, 2022 CPI‐U percentage.
- The District will budget for a 9% increase in health insurance.
- The District will budget for a 4% increase in dental insurance.
- The District will budget for a 1% increase in other expenses.
STAFFING
- Staffing plan assumptions are developed within the guidelines established by Board Policy 4221.
- a. TPR of 1:25 for grades K‐3
- b. TPR of 1:30 for grades 4‐5
- c. TRP of 1:30 for grades 6‐8
- d. TPR of 1:32 for grades 9‐1
General Fund (10) Revenues
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2020‐21 fiscal year to current. District revenues include approximately $10 million additional ESSER and similar funding compared to the prior year, and approximately $2 million less of revenue compared to the prior year due to a change in lease accounting. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 0.2%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 57% is derived from state sources and 23% from local sources.
| Revenues (By Source) | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Actual | 2022-23 Budget | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $31,097,681 | $31,893,121 | $(1,234,521) | $(1,234,521) | -3.7% |
| Other School Districts | 4,517,708 | 5,154,379 | 4,965,000 | (189,379) | -3.7% |
| Intermediate | 13,900 | 9,400 | 7,000 | (2,400) | -25.5% |
| State | 74,192,517 | 76,002,384 | 78,884,434 | 2,882,050 | 3.8% |
| Federal | 7,337,993 | 8,076,600 | 17,726,087 | 9,649,487 | 119.5% |
| Other | 3,146,481 | 6,914,456 | 3,861,154 | (3,053,302) | -44.2% |
| Total | $120,306,280 | $129,284,861 | $137,336,796 | $8,051,935 | 6.2% |
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) expenses beginning with the 2020‐21 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. Compared to the prior year, expensesincreased by approximately $10 million due to ESSER and similar funding and decreased by approximately $2 million due to a change in lease accounting. In absence of these two items, expenses would have increased approximately 0.2%.
| Expenses (By Function) | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Actual | 2022-23 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $60,286,965 | $58,911,026 | $65,038,592 | $6,127,566 | 10.4% |
| Pupil Services | 4,493,954 | 4,389,878 | 5,458,712 | 1,068,834 | 24.3% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 6,703,780 | 10,576,040 | 8,389,878 | (2,186,406) | -20.7% |
| General Admin | 1,338,131 | 783,162 | 759,738 | (23,424) | -3.0% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,220,310 | 6,619,469 | 6,667,834 | 48,365 | 0.7% |
| Buisness Admin. | 13,846,307 | 15,431,800 | 22,750,656 | 7,318,856 | 47.4% |
| Central Services | 1,546,538 | 1,661,821 | 2,115,163 | 453,342 | 27.3% |
| Insurance & Judgmt. | 1,085,773 | 919,493 | 1,125,000 | 205,507 | 22.4% |
| Debt. Service | 934,578 | 5,407,910 | 2,630,000 | (2,777,910) | -51.4% |
| Other Support Svcs. | 2,514,188 | 4,140,859 | 2,860,829 | (1,280,030) | -30.9% |
| Transfers | 14,853,727 | 13,294,453 | 12,394,808 | (899,645) | -6.8% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts | 5,833,366 | 6,172,746 | 7,035,830 | 863,084 | 14.0% |
| Other Transactions | 87,288 | 142,045 | 110,000 | (32,045) | -22.6 |
| Total | $119,744,896 | $128,450,702 | $137,336,796 | $8,886,094 | 6.9% |
| Fund Balance | $24,027,911.79 | $24,862,069.96 | $24,862,069.96 | $0 | 0.0% |
Special Education
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2020‐21 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The projected increase in revenue is due, in part, to some staff costs in being expensed to the ESSER grants in 2022‐23
| Revenue By source |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfers | $11,353,727 | $11,794,453 | $12,394,808 | $600,355 | 5.1% |
| Other School Districts | none | 16,340 | 18,900 | 2,560 | 15.7% |
| State | 4,969,280 | 5,120,965 | 5,275,000 | 154,035 | 3.0% |
| Federal | 3,769,837 | 3,468,703 | 4,139,780 | 671,077 | 19.3% |
| Total | $20,092,844 | $20,400,461 | $21,828,488 | $1,428,027 | 7.0% |
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) expenses beginning with the 2020‐21 fiscal year to the current fiscal yea
| Expenses By Function |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $15,347,857 | $15,133,492 | 16,369,931 | $1,236,439 | 8.2% |
| Pupil Services | 2,639,338 | 2,802,821 | 2,798,662 | (4,159) | -0.1% |
| Instructional Staff Serv. | 785,579 | 854,094 | 832,445 | (21,649) | -2.5% |
| General Admin. | 7,470 | 16,570 | 20,000 | 3,430 | 20.7% |
| Business Admin. | 1,184,988 | 1,203,886 | 1,485,200 | 281,314 | 23.4% |
| Central Services | 8,195 | 16,891 | 27,250 | 10,359 | 61.3% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 119,417 | 239,669 | 295,000 | 55,33 | 23.1% |
| Other Transactions | 0 | 133,038 | 0 | (133,038) | -100.0% |
| Total | $20,092,844 | $20,400,461 | $21,828,488 | $1,428,027 | 7.0% |
General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
Over half of the financial support for special education services is provided via a transfer from the General Fund (10). Because of this reliance, and because special education is a component of the broad instructional services the District provides, these funds are occasionally blended. When done so, the net totals may be considered the District’s operating budget. The values illustrated are net of the interfund transfer
| Revenues: | 2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $31,097,681 | $33,127,642 | $31,893,121 | ($1,234,521) | -3.7% |
| Other School Districts | 4,517,708 | 5,170,719 | 4,983,900 | (186,819) | -3.6% |
| Intermediate | 13,900 | 9,400 | 7,000 | (2,400) | -25.5% |
| State | 79,161,797 | 81,123,349 | 84,159,434 | 3,036,085 | 3.7% |
| Federal | 11,107,830 | 11,545,303 | 21,865,867 | 10,320,564 | 89.4% |
| Other | 3,146,481 | 6,914,456 | 3,861,154 | (3,053,302) | -44.2% |
| Expenses Instruction |
$75,634,822 | $74,044,518 | $81,408,523 | $7,364,005 | 9.9% |
| Pupil Services | 7,133,283 | 7,192,699 | 8,257,374 | $1,064,678 | 14.8% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 7,489,359 | 11,430,134 | 9,22,079 | (2,208,055) | -19.3% |
| General Admin. | 1,347,625 | 799,732 | 779,738 | (19,994) | -2.5% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,218,286 | 6,619,469 | 6,667,834 | 48,365 | 0.7% |
| Central Services | 1,627,721 | 1,678,712 | 2,142,413 | 463,701 | 27.6% |
| Insruance & Judgement | 1,085,773 | 919,493 | 1,125,000 | 205,507 | 22.4% |
| Debt Service | 934,578 | 5,407,910 | 2,630,000 | (2,777,910) | -51.4% |
| Other Support Svcs | 2,441,200 | 4,140,859 | 2,860,829 | (1,280,030) | -30.9% |
| Transfers | 3,500,000 | 1,500,000 | 0 | (1,500,000) | -100.0% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 5,952,783 | 6,412,415 | 7,330,830 | 918,415 | 14.3% |
| Other Transactions | 87,288 | 275,083 | 110,000 | (165,083) | -60.0% |
| Total Expenses | $128,484,013 | $137,056,710 | $146,770,476 | $9,713,766 | 7.1% |
| Fund Balance | $24,027,911.79 | $24,862,069.96 | $24,862,069.96 | $0 | 0.0% |
Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the District’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the District’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. In 2019, the District refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis. Debt service is levied on the calendar year basis, but budgeted for on the fiscal year basis.
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $2,781,218 | $2,758,183 | $2,749,068 | ($9,115) | -0.3% |
| Other Revenue | 8 | 1,041 | 10,000 | 8,959 | 860.6% |
| Total Revenue | 2,781,226 | 2,759,224 | 2,759,068 | (156) | 0.0% |
| Principal | 2,330,000 | 2,356,000 | 2,415,000 | 50,000 | 2.1% |
| Interest | 575,736 | 422,313 | 365,053 | (57,260) | -13.6% |
| Total Expenses | $2,905,736 | $2,787,313 | $2,780,053 | $(7,260) | -0.3% |
| Fund Balance | $810,585.98 | $782,497.22 | $761,512.22 | $(20,895.00) | -2.7% |
Fund 39 – Referendum Approved Debt The District’s Fund 39 debt relates to the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools, and the 2020 capital referendum. Since 2019, the District continues to take advantage of a strategy to defease debt, allowing for savings and the reduction of future debt obligations. The District is planning to defease approximately $6 million of debt with the current budget.
| Fund 39 Non-Referendum Debt |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $9,683,688 | $13,291,143 | $14,333,123 | $1,041,980 | 7.8% |
| Other Revenue | 66,034 | 2,560 | 5,500 | 2,940 | 114.8% |
| Total Revenue | 9,749,722 | 13,293,703 | 14,338,623 | 1,044,920 | 7.9% |
| Principal | 8,545,000 | 12,700,000 | 13,035,000 | 335,000 | 2.6% |
| Interest | 1,212,469 | 1,226,381 | 1,366,810 | 140,429 | 11.5% |
| Other | 79,585 | 15,900 | 16,000 | 100 | 0.6% |
| Total Expenses | $9,831,054 | $13,942,281 | $14,417,810 | $475,529 | 3.4% |
| Fund Balance | $376,666.40 | $659,592.73 | $580,405.73 | $(79,187.00) | -12.0% |
Capital Funds (46 & 49)
Fund 46 – Long-Term Capital Improvement
In 2015, the Board of Education acted to establish a long‐term capital improvement fund, which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in this fund is accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 during a given fiscal year or no later than July 30 following fiscal‐year‐end.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Improv. |
20120-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $3,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $0 | (1,500,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 1,239 | 7,828 | 50,000 | 42,718 | 586.6% |
| Total Revenue | 3,501,239 | 1,507,282 | 50,000 | (1,457,282) | -96.7% |
| Other | 0 | 16,908 | 0 | (16,908) | -100% |
| Total Expenses | 0 | 16,908 | 0 | (16,908) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $9,790,673.04 | $11,281,047.74 | $11,331,047.74 | $50,000.00 | 0.4% |
Fund 49 – Capital Projects
Upon issuance of the 2020 referendum‐approved debt, a capital projects fund was established to account for the costs associated with those projects.
| Fund 49 Captial Projects |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Proceeds | $22,500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Other Revenue | 860 | 30,251 | 75,000 | 44,749 | 147.9% |
| Total Revenue | 22,500,860 | 30,251 | 75,000 | 44,749 | 147.9% |
| Construction-Related | 371,297 | 9,082,157 | 8,152,656 | (929,501) | -10.2% |
| Total Expenses | 371,297 | 9,082,157 | 8,152,656 | (929,501) | -10.2% |
| Fund Balance | 22,129,565.66 | 13,077,656.38 | 5,000,000.38 | (8,077,656.00) | -61.8% |
Food Service
The District self‐operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program.
| Fund 50 Food Service |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Sales | $163,988 | 418,543 | 1,220,000 | 801,457 | 191.5% |
| State | 96,407 | none | 119,000 | 119,000 | 0.0% |
| Federal | 5,186,857 | 6,905,577 | 4,150,000 | (2,755,577) | -39.9% |
| Other Revenue | 26,713 | 26,450 | 11,000 | (15,450) | -58.4% |
| Total Revenue | 5,473,965 | 7,350,570 | 5,500,000 | (1,850,570) | -25.2% |
| Maintenance/ Facilities | 214,075 | 66,683 | 50,000 | (16,683) | -25.0% |
| Food Service | 5,038,900 | 5,605,004 | 5,397,047 | (207,957) | -3.7% |
| Internal Services | 42,923 | 46,416 | 48,953 | 2,537 | 5.5% |
| Other | 21 | 7,779 | 4,000 | (3,779) | -48.6% |
| Total Expenses | 5,295,919 | 5,725,882 | 5,500,000 | (225,882) | -3.9% |
| Fund Balance | $1,664,525.68 | 3,288,940.09 | 3,288,940.09 | none | 0.0% |
Employee Benefits Trust Fund
The District established Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post‐employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. The District, generally, makes both annual contributions to and withdrawals from the fund. The District’s expensesrelated to post‐employment benefits are decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits. As a fiduciary fund, a budget is not required to be established for Fund 73.
| Fund 73 OPEB Trust |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Contributions | 2,500,000 | 3,500,000 | 0 | (3,500,000) | -100.0% |
| Retiree Contributions | 127,768 | 114,014 | 0 | (114,014) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 5,251 | 5,696 | 0 | (5,696) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 2,633,019 | 3,619,710 | 0 | (3,619,710) | -100.0% |
| Benefits Paid | 1,265,237 | 1,202,439 | 0 | (1,202,439) | -100.0% |
| Implicit Rate Subsidy | 679,308 | 649,154 | 0 | (649,154) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | 0 | 10,417 | 0 | (10,417) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $6,492,997.97 | $8,250,697.65 | $8,250,697.65 | $0 | 0.0% |
Special Revenue Trust Fund
Fund 21 accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
As donations and expenditures are not always known, a budget is not established for Fund 21.
| Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Amount | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donations | $255,814 | $506,271 | $0 | $(506,271) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 35,,625 | 441,086 | 0 | (441,086) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 291,439 | 947,357 | 0 | (947,357) | -100.0% |
| Instructional | 241,301 | 459,058 | 0 | (459,058) | -100.0% |
| Support Services | 64,371 | 81,924 | 0 | (81,924) | -100.0% |
| Scholarships | none | 14,003 | 0 | (14,003) | -100.0% |
| Other | none | 16,419 | 0 | (16,419) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | 305,672 | 540,982 | 0 | (540,982) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $677,598.27 | $1,053,552.45 | $1,053,552.45 | $0 | 0.0% |
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND (80)
In 2019, the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy utilizing a Fund 80 levy as a financial vehicle. Fund 80 is also utilized to account for other community service initiatives that are not financed by the levy (e.g., Bags of Hope).
| Fund 80 Community Service |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Amount | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $50,000 | $175,000 | $175,000 | none | 0.0% |
| Donations | 93,497 | 150,345 | none | (150,345) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 143,497 | 325,345 | 175,000 | (150,345) | -46.2% |
| Early Literacy | 15,807 | 98,683 | 175,000 | (33,189) | -15.9% |
| Bags of Hope | 79,561 | 118,506 | none | (118,506) | -100.0% |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Total Expenses | 95,368 | 208,189 | 175,000 | (33,189) | -15.9% |
| Fund Balance | 144,1893.78 | 261,346.11 | 261,346.11 | none | 0.0% |
Enrollment & Membership
All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count generates a membership count of students actively attending the School District of Janesville or any other public school (“Members”). This count is used to calculate the District’s revenue limit, by factoring the full‐time equivalency (FTE) of each student (“Membership FTE”). Enrollment represents the headcount of students attending any school within the District, regardless of school district residency. Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value. The following chart illustrates the September enrollment, members, and membership FTE. Summer school FTE is not included.
| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | 10,362 | 10,385 | 10,310 | 10,275 | 10,146 | 10,063 |
| Members | 10,302 | 10,263 | 10,165 | 10,039 | 9,935 | 9,825 |
| Membership FTE | 10,023 | 9,992 | 9,898 | 9,780 | 9,668 | 9,528 |
Revenue Limit Authority
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a three- year rolling average.
Base revenue is key to a District’s long‐term financial health. One of the best comparable data points between and among school districts is base revenue (line seven of the revenue limit worksheet). The District’s base revenue has been decreasing over time as non‐recurring exemptions expire. The recent uptick in 2020‐21 relates to the low revenue limit ceiling increasing to $10,000 per member, up from $9,700. The District’s need to seek an operating referendum was a direct result of decreasing membership and decreasing base revenue, each of which are factored into the District’s financial forecast model
Property Tax Information
The District’s property tax is frequently measured in an amount per $1,000 of property value (mil rate). The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2015-16. The proposed mil rate is less than the mil rate originally projected ($8.87) when the referenda passed in November, 2020.
Rock County Mil Rates Over Time
Historically, the School Districts of Janesville and Milton have had the lowest rates in Rock County. Milton has not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018-19 to 2019-20.
2022-23 Tax Levy
The District’s property tax is frequently measured in an amount per $1,000 of property value (mil rate). The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2013‐14. The mil rate reduction for 2022‐23 is due, in part, to a higher‐than‐average increase in equalized property values.
2021‐22 ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
Historically, the School Districts of Janesville and Milton have had the lowestratesin Rock County. Milton had not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018‐19 to 2019‐20. Prior year data is illustrated as current year mil rates have not yet been set.
Tax Levy
The District’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the District. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and the 2020‐21 levy by municipality
| Levy (By Fund) |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Fund | $29,683,125 | $30,751,626 | $29,733,685 | $(1,017,941) | -3.3% |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | 2,781,218 | 2,758,183 | 2,749,068 | (9,115) | -0.3% |
| Referendum, Debt. Svc | 9,683,688 | 13,291,143 | 14,333,123 | 1,041,980 | 7.8% |
| Community Sercices | 50,000 | 175,000 | 175,000 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Chargeback | 175,264 | 18,752 | 3,828 | (14,924) | -79.6% |
| Total Levy | $42,373,295 | $46,994,704 | $46,994,704 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Levy (By Municipality) |
2020-21 Actual |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Janesville | $38,417,028.15 | $42,674,714 | $42,724,866 | $50,152,00 | 0.1% |
| Town of Harmony | 7,455.05 | 7,669 | 7,334 | (355.00) | -4.4% |
| Town of Janesville | 1,855,607.25 | 1,990,918 | 2,063,704 | 72,786.00 | 3.7% |
| Town of La Prairie | 432,958.86 | 1,990,918 | 2,063,704 | 72,786 | 00%3.7 |
| Town of Rock | 1,660,245.69 | 1,826,752 | 1,754,695 | (72,057.00) | -3.9% |
| Total Levy | $42,373,295.00 | $46,994,704 | $46,994,704 | $0 | 0.0% |
Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
Budget Book 2021-2022
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2021-2022
- School DIstrict of Janesville
- INTRODUCTION
- DISTRICT FUNDS
- BUILDING THE BUDGET
- GENERAL FUND (10) – REVENUES
- GENERAL FUND (10) – EXPENSES
- SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – REVENUES
- SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – EXPENSES
- DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (38 & 39)
- FUND 39 – REFERENDUM APPROVED DEBT
- CAPITAL FUNDS (46 & 49)
- FOOD SERVICE FUND (50)
- EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST FUND (73)
- SPECIAL REVENUE TRUST FUND (21)
- ENROLLMENT & MEMBERSHIP
- REVENUE LIMIT AUTHORITY
- PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION
- ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
- 2021-22 TAX LEVY
- BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – REVENUES, FUND 10
- BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – SPECIAL EDUCATION, FUND 27 REVENUES
School DIstrict of Janesville
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
The Business Services Group is pleased to present the 2021-22 School District of Janesville (“SDJ”) budget. A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 26, 2021. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the District will receive federal grants to aid the response to the pandemic. The District is using funds to offer a robust online instruction platform, reduce class size at the elementary level, maintain secondary instructional pathways, invest in sanitation efforts, install bottle filling stations, and provide personal protective equipment such as face masks. Federal funding is also assisting the District to counter the increased costs associated with transporting students in a socially distanced manner, maintaining a clean and disinfected environment, and by providing the necessary personal protective equipment for students and staff. In aggregate, the District will receive over $27 million in federal funding through three different Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief and Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Funds. The funds are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis, meaning the District must incur costs and then be reimbursed, and some of these funds are received by the District and are required to be allocated to private schools. Some of these federal funds were used during the 2020-21 fiscal year, some will be used during the 2021-22 fiscal year, and remaining funds will be carried forward to future fiscal years.
During the 2021-22 school year, in response to COVD-19 and the use of ESSER II and III, the District will engage stakeholders, evaluate and prioritize options for the use of provided funding. Keep in mind that COVID response funding is broadly targeted towards:
- Preparedness and Response to COVID 19
- Addressing Long-Term School Closure
- Educational Technology
- Outreach & Service Delivery to Special Populations
- Addressing Afterschool and Summer Learning
- Mental Health Service and Supports
Related to process and qualifying expenditures, the District will continue to seek guidance from the State of Wisconsin’s Department of Public Instruction and the US Department of Education.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves over 9,400 pre-kindergarten through 12th grade students in 21 schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are provided in two comprehensive high schools (9-12), three middle schools (6-8), twelve elementary schools (K-5), and thirteen P4J Community Partnership sites (4-year-old early learners). In addition, we serve students in four charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, TAGOS Leadership Academy, and Arise Virtual Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom as life-long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. The District is ensuring that every graduate is college and/or career ready.
In 2017, the School District adopted the Janesville Promises to address key elements impacting student and school success. These Promises utilize five components with indicators that move the entire District forward. Our ultimate Promise is that every student will graduate ready for college, career, and life. The District Staffing Plan for 2021-22 has served as the foundation for budget development activities.
Last November, the District received support from electors in the form of two referenda. The first provides $22.5 million for safety, security, and facility improvements. The second provides four years of support in addition to our revenue limit to meet operational needs of the District. The operating referendum provides an additional $3.5 million for 2021-22 to support:
- ongoing investment in curricular resources such as language arts
- maintain instructional technology for students and staff
- preserve reasonable class sizes
- attract and retain qualified educators and support staff
BUDGET DOCUMENT
The 2021-22 budget is being presented by fund. When comparing current year budget to prior-year expenditures, it may be helpful to keep in mind that the prior-year data is actual and not as originally budgeted. The 2020-21 actual data has been subject to audit, but as of the release of the budget, is not yet available in report form.
Readers will find that data presented is not a collection of program-oriented budgets displaying what each program costs, but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas describing the purpose for which expenditures are made.
This is consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements (WUFAR) structure and the budget presentation format required by §65.90, Wis. Stats. In order to assist the reader in understanding the meaning behind the numbers, narrative explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document.
The budget is based upon information known and decisions made through October 15, 2021. The October 15 certification of general/equalization aid and related adjustments to the revenue limit computation are incorporated in to the 2021-2022 budget presented here.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving short-term and long-term strategic direction and the financial health of the District. On behalf of the entire Business Services Group, we look forward to an exciting and successful school year in 2021-22.
- Dan McCrea, SFO, Chief Financial Officer
- Matthew Sylvester-Knudtson, CPA Director of Finance
- Tami Carlson, Financial Analyst/Grants Mgr.
October 18, 2021
DISTRICT FUNDS
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally-accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on-going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund (Fund 10) Special Education Fund (Fund 27) $127,262,215
- Special Education Fund (Fund 27) $20,529,840
- Debt Service Funds (Funds 38 & 39) $13,860,967
- Capital Project Funds (Funds 46 & 49) $17,000,000
- Food Service Fund (Fund 50) $5,500,000
- Community Service Fund (Fund 80) $175,000
- All-Fund Total $184,328,022
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital project funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following trust funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures:
Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post-employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
BUILDING THE BUDGET
The budget development process generally begins the December prior to start of the fiscal year, and is when budget assumptions are developed based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget as well as local determinations. The 2021-22 budget is the first year of the State’s 202123 biennial budget. Through this budget, the District will not realize a change in per-pupil revenue limit or per-pupil adjustment aid. 2021-22 BUDGET
DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process. Budget planning during a pandemic will remain conservative, in particular, student enrollment (all students) and full time equivalent for resident students.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present and the Board of Education will adopt a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The District will model the mil rate effect of pre-paying (defeasing) its long-term Fund 39 debt obligation.
- The District will secure a line of credit for the 2021-2022 fiscal year, related to the historically low November cash point, prior to the December state aid payment.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- ESSER II, or any federal pandemic relief provided to the district, will be used to supplement rather than supplant district expenses.
- Property values are assumed to increase by 3%. The current five-year average is 5.8%.
- In the Spring of 2021 the Administration will provide the Board of Education a budget prioritization list, programs and staffing, aligned with the District’s Five Promises. REVENUE Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2021-2022 per pupil categorical aid increase $0.00 per FTE. State Equalization Aid
- The state biennial budget is yet to be determined, but the assumption is that there will not be increased State Equalization Aid for 2021-2022 fiscal year. Categorical Aid
- Reimbursement for special education funding will remain unchanged from the current legislated amount of 30%. Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit increase will be $0.00 per FTE. A base FTE, using the September FTE count will be used. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2015 – 9,898
- b. 2016 – 9,780
- c. 2017 – 9,668
- d. 2018 – 9,528
- e. 2019 – 9,365
- f. 2020 – 9,063
- g. 2021 – 9,063 – assumption
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 87.
- The district will be in year one, $3,500,000, of a four-year non-recurring operational referendum to exceed revenue limit authority. Open Enrollment / Tuition Programs (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- For budget planning purposes, the District’s open enrollment-in will remain status quo at 630 and open enrollment-out will remain at 514.
- Janesville International Exchange Program (JIEP) will initially be budgeted at 2020-2021 enrollment levels. Fund 10 & 27 Grant Revenue, State and Federal Sources
- Federal and State grant award revenue will be budgeted at prior year levels.
EXPENSES
- The District will utilize a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2020-2021 expenses.
- The District will budget for a 2.50% increase in base wages, subject to the allowable July 1, 2021 CPI-U percentage.
- The District will explore additional compensation strategies, up to .25% of base wages, related to competitive market conditions.
- The District will budget for a 9% increase in health insurance.
- The District will budget for a 6% increase in dental insurance.
- The District will budget for a 1.0% increase in other expenses.
STAFFING
- 2021-22 staffing plan assumptions are developed within the guidelines established by Board Policy 4221.
- a. TPR of 1:25 for grades K-3
- b. TPR of 1:30 for grades 4-5
- c. TRP of 1:30 for grades 6-8
- d. TPR of 1:32 for grades 9-12
GENERAL FUND (10) – REVENUES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2019-20 fiscal year to current. District revenues include approximately $1.9 million additional ESSER funding compared to the prior year and an additional approximately $700,000 related to a new lease entered into. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 3.6%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 60% is derived from state sources and 25% from local sources.
| Revenue By Source | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $29,829,519 | $31,097,681 | $32,282,044 | $1,184,363 | 3.8% |
| Other School Districts | $4,793,237 | $4,517,708 | $5,015,000 | $497,292 | 11.0% |
| Intermediate | $63,846 | $13,900 | $0 | $(13,900) | -100% |
| State | $74,676,790 | $74,192,517 | $75,810,180 | $1,617,663 | 2.2% |
| Federal | $4,354,464 | $7,337,993 | $10,507,991 | $3,169,988 | 43.2% |
| Other | $440,290 | $3,146,406 | $3,647,000 | $500,594 | 15.9% |
| Total | $114,158,146 | $120,306,205 | $127,262,215 | $6,956,010 | 5.8% |
GENERAL FUND (10) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) expenses beginning with the 2019-20 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. District expenses include approximately $1.9 million additional ESSER costs compared to the prior year and an additional approximately $700,000 related to a new lease entered into. Without the two aforementioned items, expenses would have increased approximately 4.3%. As people are the District’s primary resource and method of educational delivery, wages and benefits account for over 76% of General and Special Education Funds expenses, net of transfers.
| Expenses By Source | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $55,752,565 | $60,305,963 | $66,122,774 | $5,816,811 | 9.6% |
| Pupil Services | $4,123,016 | $4,493,945 | $4,505,828 | $11,883 | 0.3% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs | $6,983,089 | $6,684,782 | $8,125,735 | $1,530,953 | 22.9% |
| General Admin | $1,096,227 | $1,339,143 | $1,235,703 | $(103,440) | -7.7% |
| School Building Admin | $5,981,459 | $6,219,298 | $6,225,556 | $6,258 | 0.1% |
| Business Admin | $14,081,959 | $13,846,307 | $15,692,397 | $1,846,090 | 13.3% |
| Central Services | $2,055,728 | $1,583,032 | $1,860,352 | $277,320 | 17.5% |
| Insurance & Judgmt. | $1,075,916 | $1,085,773 | $1,019,000 | $(66,773) | -6.1% |
| Debt Service | $185,965 | $934,578 | $1,819,020 | $884,442 | 94.6% |
| Other Support Services | $3,407,661 | $2,477,694 | $2,740,069 | $(7,598) | -0.3% |
| Transfers | $14,062,827 | $14,853,727 | $11,975,016 | $(2,878,711) | -19.4% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts | $4,756,686 | $5,833,366 | $6,258,238 | $424,872 | 7.3% |
| Other Transactions | $181,444 | $87,213 | $72,500 | $(14,713) | -16.9% |
| Total | $113,744,542 | $119,744,821 | $127,472,215 | $$7,727,394 | 6.5% |
| Fund Balance | $23,466,527.80 | $24,027,911.79 | $24,027,911.79 | $0 | 0.0% |
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – REVENUES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2019-20 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The projected decrease in state funding is due, in part, to some staff costs in 2020-21 being expensed to the ESSER grants. This results in lower state aid in the next year (2021-22).
| Revenue By Source | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $12,462,827 | $11,353,727 | $11,975,016 | $621,289 | 5.5% |
| Other School Districts | $0 | $0 | $18,388 | $18,388 | 0.0% |
| State | $4,370,565 | $4,969,280 | $4,270,000 | $(699,280) | -14.1% |
| Federal | $2,961,183 | $3,769,837 | $4,266,432 | $469,599 | 13.2% |
| Other | $100 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Total | $19,794,675 | $20,092,844 | $20,529,840 | $436,996 | 2.2% |
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) expenses beginning with the 2019-20 fiscal year to the current fiscal year.
| Expenses By Function | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $15,057,836 | $15,345,596 | $15,452,166 | $106,570 | 0.7% |
| Pupil Services | $2,455,286 | $2,639,338 | $2,631,115 | (8,223) | -0.3% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs | $814,970 | $787,841,7,000 | $869,405 | $81,564 | 10.4% |
| General Admin | $19,743 | $7,470 | $7,000 | $(470) | -6.3% |
| Buisness Admin | $1,071,297 | $1,184,988 | $1,412,619 | $227,631 | 19.2% |
| Central Services | $6,853 | $8,195 | $25,500 | $17,305 | 211.2% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | $368,690 | $119,416 | $132,035 | $12,619 | 10.6% |
| Total | $19,794,675 | $20,092,844 | $20,529,840 | $436,996 | 2.2% |
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (38 & 39)
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the District’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the District’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. It should be noted that in 2019 the district refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis. Debt service is levied on the calendar year basis, but budgeted for on the fiscal year basis.
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt | 2019-20 Actual | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $2,927,898 | $2,781,218 | $2,758,183 | $(23,035) | -0.8% |
| Refinancing | $10,075,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Other Revenue | $82,641 | $8 | $0 | $(8) | -100% |
| Total Revenue | $13,085,539 | $2,781,226 | $2,758,183 | $(23,043) | -0.8% |
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt | 2019-20 Actual | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principal | $10,735,000 | $2,330,000 | $2,365,000 | $35,000 | 1.5% |
| Interest | $509,520 | $575,736 | $422,313 | $(153,423) | -26.6% |
| Other | $105,339 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $11,349,859 | $2,905,736 | $2,787,313 | $(118,423) | -4.1% |
| Fund Balance | $935,095.76 | $810,585.98 | $781,455.98 | $(29,130.00_ | -3.6% |
FUND 39 – REFERENDUM APPROVED DEBT
The District’s Fund 39 debt relates to the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools, and the 2020 capital referendum. Since 2019 the district took advantage of a strategy, to pre-pay debt, allowing for savings and the restructuring of debt retiring in 2028. The District is planning to pre-pay $4,100,000 of debt.
| Fund 39 Non-Referendum Debt | 2019-20 Actual | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $9,773,715 | $9,683,688 | $13,291,143 | $3,607,455 | 37.3% |
| Other Revenue | $16,845 | $66,034 | $552,567 | $486,533 | 736.8% |
| Total Revenue | $9,790,557 | $9,749,722 | $13,843,710 | $4,093,988 | 42.0% |
| %nd 38 Non-Referendum Debt | 2019-20 Actual | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principal | $8,560,000 | $8,545,000 | $12,630,000 | $4,085,000 | 47.9% |
| Interest | $1,231,401 | $1,212,469 | $1,215,967 | $3,498 | 0.3% |
| Other | $14,900 | $79,585 | $15,000 | $(64,585) | -81.2% |
| Total Expenses | $9,806,301 | $9,837,054 | $13,860,967 | $4,023,913 | 40.9% |
| Fund Balance | $463,998.70 | $376,666.40 | $359,409.40 | $(17,257.00) | -4.6% |
CAPITAL FUNDS (46 & 49)
In 2015, the Board of Education acted to establish a long-term capital improvement fund, which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in this fund is accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 during a given fiscal year or no later than July 30 following fiscal-year-end.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Impv. | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $1,600,000 | $3,500,000 | $0 | $(3,500,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | $101,572 | $5,221 | $0 | $(5,221) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | $1,701,572 | $3,505,221 | $0 | $(3,505,221) | -100.0% |
| Expenses | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Fund Balance | $6,285,452.35 | $9,790,673.04 | $9,790,673.04 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fund 49 – Capital Projects
Upon issuance of the 2020 referendum-approved debt, a capital projects fund was established to account for the costs associated with those projects.
| Fund 46 Capital Projects | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Proceeds | $ 0 | $22,500,000 | $ 0 | $(22,500,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | $0 | $860 | $1,000 | $140 | 16.3% |
| Total Revenue | $0 | $22,500,860 | $1,000 | $(22,499,860) | -100.0% |
| Construction | $0 | $971,297 | $17,000,000 | $16,628,703 | 4478.5% |
| Transfers | $372 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $372 | $371,297 | $17,000,000 | $16,628,703 | 4478.5% |
| Fund Balance | $ 0 | $22,129,562.66 | $5,130,562.66 | $(16,999,000.00) | -76.8% |
FOOD SERVICE FUND (50)
The District self-operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program.
| Food Service Fund | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Sales | $815,638 | $163,988 | $165,000 | $1,012 | 0.6% |
| State | $110,497 | $96,407 | $0 | $(96,407) | -100.0% |
| Federal | $4,179,455 | $96,407 | $0 | $(96,407) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | $35,825 | $26,713 | $1,000 | $(25,713) | -96.3% |
| Total Revenue | $5,141,415 | $$5,473,965 | $$5,5000,000 | $26,035 | 0.5% |
| Maintenance / Facilities | $22,,996 | $214,074 | $76,773 | $(137,301) | -64.1% |
| Food Service | $5,219,505 | $5,038,900 | $5,373,889 | $334,989 | 6.6% |
| Internal Services | $0 | $42,923 | $49,338 | $6,415 | 14.9% |
| Other | $0 | $21 | $0 | $(21) | -100.0% |
| Total Expensis | $5,242,501 | $5,295,918 | $5,500,000 | $204,082 | 3.9% |
| Fund Balance | $1,486,207.47 | $1,664,252.68 | $1,664,252.68 | $0 | 0.0% |
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST FUND (73)
The District established Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post-employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. The District, generally, makes both annual contributions to and withdrawals from the fund. The District’s expenses related to post-employment benefits are decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits. A budget is not required to be established for Fund 73.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Impv. | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Contributions | $3,075,000 | $2,500,000 | $0 | $(2,500,000) | -100.0% |
| Retiree Contributions | $130,534 | $127,768 | $0 | $(127,768) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | $84,710 | $5,251 | $0 | $(5,251) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | $3,290,244 | $2,633,019 | $0 | $(2,633,019) | -100.0% |
| Benefits Paid | $1,355,935 | $1,265,237 | $0 | $(1,265,237) | -100.0% |
| Implicit Rate Subsidy | $362,511 | $679,308 | $0 | $(679,308) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | $1,718,446 | $1,944,545 | $0 | $(1,944,545) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $5,804,523.73 | $6,492,997.97 | $6,492,997.97 | $0 | 0.0% |
SPECIAL REVENUE TRUST FUND (21)
Fund 21 accounts for gifts and donations to the District. A budget is not required to be established for Fund 21.
| Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donations | $583,619 | $255,814 | $0 | $(255,814) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | $215,991 | $35,625 | $0 | $(35,625) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | $799,610 | $291,439 | $0 | $(291,439) | -100.0% |
| Instructional | $983,955 | $241,301 | $0 | $(241,301) | -100.0% |
| Support Services | $105,709 | $64,371 | $0 | $(64,371) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | $489,664 | $305,672 | $0 | $(305,672) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $691,831.31 | $677,598.27 | $677,598.27 | $0 | 0.0% |
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND (80)
In 2019, the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy utilizing a Fund 80 levy as a financial vehicle. Fund 80 is also utilized to account for other community service initiatives that are not financed by the levy.
| Fund 80 Community Service | 2019-20 Actual | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $50,000 | $50,000 | $175,000 | $125,000 | 250.0% |
| Donations | $147,930 | $93,497 | $0 | $(93,497) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | $197,930 | $143,497 | $175,000 | $31,503 | 22.0% |
| Fund 80 Community Service | 2019-20 Actual | 2020-21 Actual | 2021-22 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Literacy | $30,666 | $11,419 | $175,000 | $163,581 | 1432.5% |
| Bags of Hope | $86,453 | $79,561 | $0 | $(79,561) | -100.0% |
| Other | $1,827 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $118,946 | $90,980 | $175,000 | $84,020 | 92.3% |
| Fund Balance | $96,061.59 | $677,598.27 | $677,598.27 | $0 | 0.0% |
ENROLLMENT & MEMBERSHIP
Enrollment represents the headcount of students on any given school day attending any school within the District. All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count generates a membership count of students actively attending the School District of Janesville or any other public school. This count is used to calculate the District’s revenue limit, by factoring the full-time equivalency (FTE) of each student. Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value.
REVENUE LIMIT AUTHORITY
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a threeyear rolling average.
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a threeyear rolling average.
PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION
ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
2021-22 TAX LEVY
The District’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the district. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and the 2019-2020 levy by municipality.
| Levy By Fund | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Fund | $27,983,099 | $29,683,125 | $30,751,626 | $1,068,501 | 3.6% |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | $2,927,898 | $2,781,213 | $2,758,183 | $(23,035) | -0.8% |
| Referendum Debt Svc. | $9,773,713 | $9,683,688 | $12,968,893 | $3,285,205 | 33.9% |
| Community Service | $50,000 | $50,000 | $175,000 | $125,000 | 250.0% |
| Charge Back | $23,809 | $175,264 | $18,752 | $(156,512) | -89.9% |
| Total Levy | $40,758,519 | $42,373,295 | $46,672,454 | $4,299,159 | 10.1% |
| Levy By Municipality | 2019-2020 Actual | 2020-2021 Actual | 2021-2022 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Janesville | $37,106,153.00 | $38,417,028.15 | $42,674,714.00 | $4,257,685.85 | 11.1% |
| Town of Harmony | $6,981.00 | $7,455.05 | $7,669.00 | $213.95 | 2.9% |
| Town of Janesville | $1,705,456.00 | $1,855,607.25 | $1,990,918.00 | $135,310.75 | 7.3% |
| Town of La Prairie | $406,289.00 | $432,958.86 | $494,651.00 | $61,692.14 | 14.2% |
| Town of Rock | $1,533,640.00 | $1,660,245.69 | $1,826,752.00 | $166,506.31 | 10.0% |
| Total Levy | $40,758,519.00 | $42,373,295.00 | $46,994,704.00 | $4,621,409.00 | 10.9% |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – REVENUES, FUND 10
| General Fund | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning Fund Balance (Account 930 000) |
$23,052,923.14 | $23,466,527.80 | $24,027,911.79 |
| Ending Fund Balance, Nonspendabel (Account 935 000) | $221,015.32 | $762,228.05 | $0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance, Restricted (Account 936 000) |
$239,277.87 | $77,522.73 | $0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance, Committed (Account 937 000) |
$100,000.00 | $100,000.00 | $0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance, Assigned (Account 938 000) |
$2,641,309.36 | $1,103,150.36 | $0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance, Unassigned (Account 939 000) |
$20,264,925.25 | $21,984,677.65 | $24,027,911.79 |
| Total Ending Fund Balance (Account 903 000) |
$23,466,527.80 | $24,027,911.79 | $23,817,911.79 |
| Revenues & Other Financing Sources | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Transfers-in | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Local Sources 210 Taxes |
$28,097,872.23 | $30,036,923.23 | $30,840,378 |
| 240 Payments for Services | $889,000.00 | $500,719.00 | $941,703 |
| 260 Non-Capital Sales | $34,682.34 | $236,987.75 | $0 |
| 270 School Activity Income | $140,766.06 | $18,068.40 | $237,063 |
| 280 Interest on Investments | $101,861.45 | $8,534.63 | $0 |
| 290 Other Revenue Local Sources | $565,337.45 | $296,446.58 | $262,900 |
| Subtotal Local Sources | $29,829,519.53 | $31,097,680.58 | $32,282,044 |
| Other School Districts Within Wisconsin | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 310 Transit Aids | $10,824.45 | $8,944.63 | $0 |
| 340 Payments for Services | $4,573,322.00 | $4,508,281.12 | $5,015,000 |
| 380 Medical Service Reimbusements | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 390 Other Inter-district, Within Wisconsin | $0.00 | $482.12 | $0 |
| Subtotal Other School Districts Within Wisconsin | $4,584,146.45 | $4,517,707.87 | $5,015,000 |
| Other School Districts Outside Wisconsin | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 440 Payments for Services | $290,090.71 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 490 Other Inter-disctrict, Outside Wisconsin | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School Discticts Outside Wisconsin | $209,090.71 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Intermediate Sources 510 Transit of Aids |
$21,172.96 | $13,900.00 | $0.00 |
| 530 Payments for Services From CCDEB | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 540 Payments for Services From CESA | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 580 Medical Services Reimbursement | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 590 Other Intermediate Sources | $42,672.91 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Intermediate Sources | $63,845.87 | $13,900.00 | $0.00 |
| State Sources 610 State Aid - Categorical |
$597,441.56 | $531,218.19 | $461,000 |
| 620 State Aid - General | $65,221,202.00 | $65,414,721.00 | $67,069,623 |
| 630 DPI Special Prject Grants | $253,249.37 | $173,904.60 | $204,120 |
| 640 Payments for Services | $261,454.00 | $259,582.00 | $200,000 |
| 650 Student Achievement Gaurantee in Education (SAGE Grant) | $728,352.88 | $597,600.66 | $645,000 |
| 660 Other State Revenue Through Local Units | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 690 Other Revenue | 7,615,090.05 | 7,214,750.52 | 7,230,437 |
| Subtotal State Sources | $74,676,789.86 | $74,162,517.24 | $75,810,180 |
| Federal Sources 710 Federal Aid - Categorical |
$114,345.64 | 80,53.32 | 102,395 |
| 720 Impact Aid | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 730 DPI Special Project Grants | $1,146,130.00 | $4,159,624.71 | $7,156,521 |
| 750 IASA Grants | $2,329,260.39 | $2,348,515.89 | $2,649,075 |
| 760 JTPA | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 770 Other Federal Revenue Through Local Units | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 780 Other Federal Revenue Through Stae | $764,727.25 | $749,349.87 | $600,000 |
| 790 Other Federal Revenue Direct | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Federal Sources | $4,354,463.96 | $7,337,992.79 | $10,507,991 |
| Other Financing Source 850 Reorganization Settlement |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 860 Compensation, Fixed Assests | $27,000.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 870 Long-Term Obligations | $0.00 | $2,833,521.00 | $3,502,000 |
| Subtotal Other Financing Sources | $27,000.00 | $2,833,521.00 | $3,502,000 |
| Other Revenues 960 Adjustments |
$14,083.78 | $86,525.07 | $0.00 |
| 970 Refund of Disbursment | $319,530.68 | $168,873.31 | $100,000 |
| 980 Medical Service Reimbursement | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 990 Miscellaneous | $79,675.65 | $57,487.04 | $45,000 |
| Subtotal Other Revenues | $413,290.11 | $312,885.42 | $145,000 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $114,158,146.49 | $120,306,204.90 | $127,262,215 |
BUDGET ADOPTON FORMAT – EXPENSES BY FUNCTION, FUND 10
| Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instrution 110 000 Undifferentiated Curriculum |
$23,473,931.74 | $25,645,757.48 | $31,072,401 |
| 120 000 Regular Curriculum | $18,812,965.17 | $20,222,887.86 | $22,074,857 |
| 130 000 Vocational Curriculum | $3,703,684.55 | $3,661,188.99 | $3,611,518 |
| 140 000 Physical Curriculum | $3,287,115.23 | $3,240,128.88 | $3,134,513 |
| 160 000 Co-Curricular Activities | $1,214,021.90 | $1,059,001.84 | $1,197,962 |
| 170 000 Other Special Needs | $5,260,846.12 | $6,476,998.10 | $5,031,523 |
| Subtotal Instruction | $55,752,564.71 | $60,305,963.15 | $66,122,774 |
| Support Sources 210 000 Pupil Services |
$4,123,015.82 | $4,493,944.69 | $4,505,828 |
| 220 000 Instructional Staff Services | $6,983,089.38 | $6,684,781.58 | $8,215,732 |
| 230 000 General Administration | $1,096,226.55 | $1,339,143.10 | $1,235,703 |
| 240 000 School Building Administration | $5,981,459.45 | $6,219,298.13 | $6,225,556 |
| 250 000 Business Administration | $14,081,958.67 | $13,846,301.41 | $15,692,397 |
| 260 000 Central Srevices | $2,055,728.29 | $1,583,032.26 | $1,860,352 |
| 270 000 Insurance & Judgments | $1,075,915.70 | $1,085,773.02 | $1,019,000 |
| 280 000 Debt Services | $185,965.08 | $934,577.50 | $1,819,020 |
| 290 000 Other Support Services | $3,407,661.37 | $2,477,693.83 | $2,470,096 |
| Subtotal Support Sources | $38,991,020.31 | $38,664,551.52 | $43,043,687 |
| Non-Program Transactions 410 000 |
$14,062,827.22 | $14,853,727.38 | $11,975,016 |
| 430 000 | $4,756,685.62 | $5,833,366.32 | $6,258,238 |
| 450 000 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 490 000 | $181,443.97 | $87,212.54 | $72,500 |
| Subtotal Non-Progran & Transactions | $19,000,956.81 | $20,774,306.24 | $18,305,754 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $113,744,541.83 | $119,744,820.91 | $127,472,215 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND, FUND 21
Fund 21, Special Revenue Trust Fund is used to account for trust funds, such as student activity accounts, building and district level gifts and donations.
| SPECIAL PROJECTS FUNDS (fUNDS 21, 23, 29) | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | $381,885.06 | $691,831.31 | $677,598 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | $691,831.31 | $677,598.27 | $677,598 |
| Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $799,610.48 | $291,432.69 | $0.00 |
| 100 000 Instruction | $383,955.26 | $241,301.08 | $0.00 |
| 200 000 Support Services | $105,708.97 | $64,370.65 | $0.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $489,664.23 | $305,671.73 | $0.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – SPECIAL EDUCATION, FUND 27 REVENUES
| Special Education Fund (Fund 27) | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $12,462,827.22 | $11,353,727.38 | $11,975,016 |
| 100 Transfers-in | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 240 Payments for Services | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 260 Non-Capital Sales | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 270 School Activity Income | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 290 Other Revenue, Local Sources | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Local Sources | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Other School Districts Within Wisconsin 310 |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $18,388 |
| 310 Transit Aids | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 340 Payments for Services | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 380 Medical Service Reimbusements | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 390 Other Inter-district, Within Wisconsin | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School Districts Within Wisconsin | $0.00 | $0.00 | $18,388 |
| Other School Districts Outside Wisconsin 440 Payments for Services |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 490 Other Inter-disctrict, Outside Wisconsin | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School Discticts Outside Wisconsin | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Intermediate Sources 510 Transit of Aids |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 530 Payments for Services From CCDEB | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 540 Payments for Services From CESA | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 580 Medical Services Reimbursement | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 590 Other Intermediate Sources | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Intermediate Sources | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| State Sources 610 State Aid - Categorical |
$4,210,307.00 | $4,830,929.00 | $4,160,000 |
| 620 State Aid - General | $44,824.00 | $43,429.00 | $40,000 |
| 630 DPI Special Prject Grants | $24,738.66 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 640 Payments for Services | $34,695.00 | $47,922.00 | 30,000 |
| 650 Student Achievement Gaurantee in Education (SAGE Grant) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 660 Other State Revenue Through Local Units | $56,000.00 | $47,000.00 | $40,000 |
| Subtotal State Sources | $4,370,564.66 | $4,969,280.00 | $4,270,000 |
| Federal Sources 710 Federal Aid - Categorical |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 730 DPI Special Project Grants | $2,461,158.07 | $3,129,950.89 | $3,766,436 |
| 750 IASA Grants | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 760 JTPA | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 770 Other Federal Revenue Through Local Units | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 780 Other Federal Revenue Through Stae | $500,024.59 | $639,886.10 | $500,000 |
| 790 Other Federal Revenue Direct | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Federal Sources | $2,961,182.66 | $3,769,836.99 | $4,266,436 |
| Other Financing Source 850 Reorganization Settlement |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 860 Compensation, Fixed Assests | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 870 Long-Term Obligations | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Other Financing Sources | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Other Revenues 960 Adjustments |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 970 Refund of Disbursment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 990 Miscellaneous | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Other Revenues | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $19,794,674.54 | $20,092,844.37 | $20,529,840 |
BUDGETE ADOPTION FORMAT – SPECIAL EDUCATION, FUND 27 EXPENSES
| Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instrution 110 000 Undifferentiated Curriculum |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 120 000 Regular Curriculum | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 130 000 Vocational Curriculum | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 140 000 Physical Curriculum | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 150 000 Special Edcuation Curriculum | $14,900,527.45 | $15,188,572.52 | $15,286,777 |
| 160 000 Co-Curricular Activities | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 170 000 Other Special Needs | $157,309.01 | $157,023.20 | $165,389 |
| Subtotal Instruction | $15,057,836.46 | $15,345,595.72 | $15,452,166 |
| Support Sources 210 000 Pupil Services |
$2,455,285.92 | $2,639,338.32 | $2,631,115 |
| 220 000 Instructional Staff Services | $814,969.65 | $787,840.75 | $869,405 |
| 230 000 General Administration | $19,742.66 | $7,470.00 | $7,000 |
| 240 000 School Building Administration | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 250 000 Business Administration | $1,071,297.14 | $1,184,988.26 | $1,412,619 |
| 260 000 Central Srevices | $6,853.03 | $8,194.82 | $25,500 |
| 270 000 Insurance & Judgments | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 280 000 Debt Services | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 290 000 Other Support Services | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Support Sources | $4,386,148.40 | $4,627,832.15 | $4,945,939 |
| Non-Program Transactions 410 000 |
$0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 430 000 | $368,689.68 | $119,416.50 | $132,035 |
| 490 000 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Subtotal Non-Progran & Transactions | $368,689.68 | $119,416.50 | $132,035 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $19,794,674.54 | $20,092,844.37 | $20,529,840 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUNDS 38 & FUND 39, DEBT SERVICE
| Debt Service Fund (Funds 38, 39) | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | $1,356,007.70 | $1,399,094.46 | $1,187,252.61 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | $1,399,094.46 | $1,187,252.61 | $1,140,865.61 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $22,876,096.63 | $12,530,947.51 | $16,601,893 |
| 281 000 Long-Term Capital Debt | $11,483,151.04 | $12,742,789.36 | $16,601,893 |
| 282 000 Refinancing | $10,070,338.83 | $$0.00 | $0.00 |
| 283 000 Operational Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 285 000 Post Employment Benefit Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 289 000 Other Long-Term General Obligation Debt | $1,279,520.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $22,833,009.87 | $12,742,789.36 | $16,648,280 |
| 842 000 Indebtedness, End of Year | $46,740,000.00 | $58,365,000.00 | $45,7335,000 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUNDS 46 & 49, CAPITAL
| Capital Projects Fund (Funds 41, 46, 48 ,49) | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | $4,584,252.19 | $6,285,452.35 | $31,920,235.70 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | $6,285,452.35 | $31,920,235.70 | $14,922,235.70 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $1,701,571.97 | $26,006,080.40 | $2,000 |
| 100 000 Instruction | $0.00 | $$0.00 | $0.00 |
| 200 000 Support Services | $0.00 | $371,297.05 | $17,000,000 |
| 300 000 Community Services | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | $371.81 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $371.81 | $371,297.05 | $17,000,000 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUND 50, FOOD SERVICE
| Food Service Fund (Fund 50) | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | $1,587,293.98 | $1,486,207.47 | $1,664,252.68 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | $1,486,207.47 | $1,664,252.68 | $1,664,252.68 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $5,141,414.72 | $5,473,943.45 | $5,500,000 |
| 200 000 Support Services | $5,242,501.23 | $5,295,898.24 | $5,500,000 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $5,242,501.23 | $5,295,898.24 | $5,500,000 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUND 80, COMMUNITY SERVICE
| Community Service Fund (Fund 80) | Audited 2019-20 |
Unaudited 2020-19 |
Budget 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | $17,077.79 | $96,061.59 | $144,187.78 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | $96,061.59 | $144,189.78 | $144,189.78 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | $197,929.61 | $143,496.57 | $175,000 |
| 200 000 Support Services | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 300 000 Community Services | $118,945.81 | $95,368.38 | $175,000 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | $118,945.81 | $95,368.38 | $175,000 |
Budget Book 2020-2021
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2020-2021
- School District of Janesville
- Introduction / District Overview
- District Funds
- Building the Budget
- General Fund (10) Revenues
- Special Education
School District of Janesville
Introduction / District Overview
INTRODUCTION
The Business Services team is pleased to present the 2020-2021 School District of Janesville Budget. A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 27, 2020. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the School District of Janesville received two federal grants to supplement the district’s response to the pandemic. The grants are not being used to supplant existing or normal operating expenditures, but rather the district has chosen to use the funds to expand Arise Virtual Academy, providing on-line instruction and support, thereby reducing the number of students in our traditional brick and mortar buildings. Federal funding is also assisting the district to counter the increased costs associated with transporting students in a socially distanced manner, maintaining a clean and disinfected environment, and by providing the necessary personal protective equipment for students and staff. The district received the following federal grant awards:
- Elementary & Secondary Emergency Relief Fund (ESSR) $2,000,119.00
- Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) $1,434,637.00
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves approximately 9,440 pre-kindergarten through 12th grade students in 21 schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are provided in two comprehensive high schools (9-12), three middle schools (6-8), twelve elementary schools (K-5), and thirteen P4J Community Partnership sites (4year-old early learners). In addition, we serve students in four charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, TAGOS Leadership Academy, and the Arise Virtual Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom as life-long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. In short, the district is ensuring that every graduate is college and/or career ready.
In 2017, the School District adopted the "Janesville Promises" to address key elements impacting student and school success. These Promises utilize Five components with indicators that move the entire district forward. Our ultimate Promise is that every student will graduate ready for college, career, and life. The District “Staffing Plan for 2020-2021” has served as the foundation for budget development activities.
BUDGET DOCUMENT
The 2020-2021 budget is being presented by fund. When comparing current year budget to prioryear expenditures, it may be helpful to keep in mind that the prior-year data is actual and not as originally budgeted. The 2019-2020 actual data has been subject to audit, but as of the release of the budget, is not yet available in report form.
Readers will find that data presented is not a collection of program-oriented budgets displaying what each program costs, but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas that describe the purpose for which expenditures are made. This is consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements (WUFAR) structure and the budget presentation format required by Chapter 65.90, Wis. Stats. In order to assist the reader in understanding the meaning behind the numbers, narrative explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document.
The budget is based upon all information known and decisions made through October 15, 2020. The last piece of budget data, the October 15 Aid Certification and related adjustments to the Revenue Limit computation, are incorporated in to the final 2020-2021 District budget.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving short-term and long-term strategic direction and the financial health of the district. We look forward to an exciting and successful school year in 2020-2021. In closing, on November 3, 2020, the district is seeking the approval of two referendum questions. The first related to an investment in safety, security and facilities and the second related to operations. Each question is critical to the district.
- Question 1. $22.5 million for safety, security and facility improvements
- Question 2. A four-year, non-recurring referendum to exceed the district revenue limit authority; $3.5 million in year one, 7.5 million in year two, 11.5 million in year three and 14.5 million in year four beginning in the 2021-2022 fiscal year.
- Dan McCrea, SFO Chief Financial Officer
- Jamie Legreid Comptroller
- Tami Carlson Financial Analyst / Grants Manager
October 16, 2020
District Funds
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally‐accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on‐going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund (Fund 10) $120,684,879
- Special Education Fund (Fund 27) $20,915,531
- Debt Service Funds (Funds 38 & 39) $12,677,973
- Capital Funds (Funds 46 & 49) $1,186,952
- Food Service Fund (Fund 50) $4,990,373
- Community Service Fund (Fund 80) $50,000
- All Fund Total $160,505,708
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures:
- Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post‐employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
- Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District
Building the Budget
BUILDING THE BUDGET
December marks the official start to building the district’s budget, beginning with the development of budget assumptions based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget in support of education as well as local determinations. The 2020-2021 district budget is in year two of the state’s biennial budget which supported a $0 increase in per student categorial aid, a $179 per member increase in revenue limit authority, a low revenue limit ceiling increase to $10,000 per member and an increase in special education reimbursement from $.248 to $.30 for every local dollar spent in special education costs.
2020-2021 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS - UPDATED
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present and the Board of Education will adopt a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The District will model the mil rate effect of pre-paying (defeasing) its long-term Fund 39 debt obligation.
- The District will examine cash flow needs to determine the necessity of short-term borrowing.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- Property values are expected to increase by 4%, with the district’s final equalized property value, as determined by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue to be 3.9%. The prior fiveyear average is 5.19%.
- In the Spring of 2020 the Administration will provide the Board of Education a budget prioritization list aligned with the District’s Five Promises. REVENUE Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2020-2021 per pupil categorical aid will remain flat at the 2019-2020 rate of $742.00 per FTE. Depending on membership, the total value will either increase or decrease revenue.
- The state biennial budget allows for no increase State Equalization Aid in 2020-2021.
- Reimbursement for special education funding will increase from $.30 on the dollar yielding approximately $895,000 more in state revenue, thereby decreasing the annual Fund 10 to 27 transfer by the same amount. Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit increase will be $179.00 per FTE; however, the district will experience a decline in its base revenue limit with the expiration of the prior years $1,406,500 non-recurring, declining revenue exemption. Furthermore, the district’s low revenue limit ceiling will increase $300; from $9,700 to $10,000 per FTE. The district’s base revenue rose by 1.32%
- For budget planning purposes the District’s non-summer school student FTE for September is projected to decrease to from 9,360 to 9,231. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2015 – 9,898
- b. 2016 – 9,780
- c. 2017 – 9,668
- d. 2018 – 9,528
- e. 2019 – 9,370
- f. 2020 – 9,231 – assumption, actual 9,060 – a total decrease of 310
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 70; however, the actual summer school FTE was 35.
- State Equalization Aid increased $296,983 from $64,477,055 to $64,774,038. Note that an increase in state equalization aid is not an increase in revenue, but rather an off-set of local tax levy within the district’s revenue limit authority.
OPEN ENROLLMENT PROGRAM (OUTSIDE THE DISTRICT’S REVENUE LIMIT AUTHORITY)
- For budget planning purposes, the District’s open enrollment-in will remain status quo at 601 (578.2FTE, $4,645,156), and open enrollment-out will remain at 401 (388.4 FTE, $3,159,330). To the contrary, final open enrollment numbers were incorporated in to the district’s budget. 568 non-resident students attending and 466 residents attending elsewhere. Open enrollment students vary by FTE and cost or revenue within a fluid environment known as alternative open enrollment, meaning families may come and go as they choose. In short, the district will see a decline in open enrollment net revenue by approximately $725,793 as of the September 18, 2020 third Friday count. EXPENSES
- 16. The District utilized a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2019-2020 expenses.
- The District’s increase wage increase settled at 2.24%. The District’s experienced a 7.01% increase in health insurance. Fund 10 and 27 salary and benefit compensation budget over prior year actual increased 4.25%, including the addition of salary and benefits associated with staffing Arise Virtual Academy in response to COVID-19 and supported by federal funding. STAFFING
- As presented by Scott Garner to the BOE on November 12, 2019 the 2020-2021 staffing plan assumptions are developed within the guidelines established by Board Policy 4221. a. TPR of 1:25 for grades K-3 b. TPR of 1:30 for grades 4-5 c. TRP of 1:30 for grades 6-8 d. TPR of 1:32 for grades 9-12 19. As outlined on Page 3 of the annual staffing plan, staffing costs were reduced by $353,549 or 5.49 full time equivalents.
OTHER BUDGETARY CONSIDERATIONS
- As noted earlier in the budget report, the School District of Janesville is the recipient of two federal grants to aid the district’s response to COVID-19. The grants are not being used to supplant existing or normal operating expenditures, but rather the district has chosen to use the funds to expand Arise Virtual Academy, providing on-line instruction and support, thereby reducing the number of students in our traditional brick and mortar buildings. Federal funding is also assisting the district to counter the increased costs associated with transporting students in a socially distanced manner, maintaining a clean and disinfected environment, and by providing the necessary personal protective equipment for students and staff. The district received the following federal grant awards:
- Elementary & Secondary Emergency Relief Fund (ESSR) $2,000,119.00
- Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) $1,434,637.00
- The district opted to lease technology, notably, iPads for elementary students rather than directly purchase. The leasing of technology affords the district to earn a residual at the end of a lease term or directly purchase the device for a pre-determined market value. The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction regulates that the full cost of lease be recorded in the obligated fiscal year as a revenue and off-setting expenses. As such the district’s total revenues and expenses increased $2,692,990, representing the full lease value.
General Fund (10) Revenues
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2020‐21 fiscal year to current. District revenues include approximately $10 million additional ESSER and similar funding compared to the prior year, and approximately $2 million less of revenue compared to the prior year due to a change in lease accounting. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 0.2%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 57% is derived from state sources and 23% from local sources.
REVENUES – FUND 10
The following chart and table illustrate the district’s GENERAL FUND 10 revenues, from all sources, beginning with the 2018-19 fiscal year to the current 2020-2021 fiscal year. District revenues include ESSR and GEER funding as well as documenting the district’s lease cost, illustrating a 5.72% increase in revenue. Without the two aforementioned revenue sources, district revenues would have increased only .29%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, 61% is derived from state sources, 26% from local sources, and the remaining from inter-district (open enrollment), federal and miscellaneous sources.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity | 2019-20 FY Activity | 2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Local Sources | $30,229,278.21 | $29,829,519.53 | $30,922,595.00 | $1,093,075.47 | 3.7% |
| Inter-Dis Pymt. in WI | $4,355,170.38 | $4,584,146.45 | $4,605,091.00 | $20,944.55 | 0% |
| Intr-Dis Pymt Out WI | $378,793.31 | $209,090.71 | $0 | -$209,090.71 | -100% |
| Rev. Intermediate SOU | $28,785.10 | $63,845.87 | $5,600.00 | -$554,608.86 | -91% |
| Rev. State Sources | $75,162,348.34 | $74,676,789.86 | $74,122,181.00 | -$554,608.86 | -0.7% |
| Rev. Federal Sources | $4,743,729.53 | $4,354,463.96 | $8,096,170.00 | $3,741,706.04 | 86% |
| Other Financing Sources | $824,319.00 | $27,000.00 | $2,692,994.00 | $2,665,994.00 | 9874% |
| Other Revenue | $3,081,844.33 | $413,290.11 | $240,248.00 | -$173,042.11 | -42% |
| General | $118,804,268.20 | $114,158,146.49 | $120,684,879.00 | $6,526,732.51 | 5.72% |
EXPENSES – FUND 10
The following chart and table illustrate the district’s GENERAL FUND 10 expenses, all objects, beginning with the 2018-19 fiscal year to the current 2020-2021 fiscal year. District expenses include ESSR and GEER funding as well as documenting the district’s lease cost, illustrating a 6.10 % increase in expenses. Without the two aforementioned expenses, district expenses would have increased only .29%. In the context of Fund 10 expenses, salaries and benefits account for a majority of expenses, 66%. As people are the district’s primary resource and method of educational delivery, both Fund 10 and 27 salary and benefit expenses account for 77.7% of all expenses.
| Expenses (By Function) | 2018-19 FY Activity | 2019-20 FY Activity | 2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saleries | 57,003,337.90 | 57,142,030.24 | 61,694,495.00 | 4,552,464.76 | 7.97% |
| Employee Benefits | 19,901,974.25 | 19,925,317.13 | 18,424,910.00 | -1,500,407.13 | -7.53% |
| Purchased Services | 17,033,203.83 | 15,027,563.80 | 17,983,782.00 | 2,956,218.20 | 19.67% |
| Non-Capital Objects | 4,485,975.41 | 3,977,288.01 | 6,132,498.00 | 2,155,209.99 | 54.19% |
| Capital Objects | 3,582,371.28 | 1,977,288.01 | 1,091,707.00 | -864,385.04 | -44.19% |
| Debt Retirement | 92,993.12 | 185,965.08 | 890,335.00 | 704,369.92 | 378.76% |
| Insurance / Judgments | 1,051,276.97 | 1,047,771.05 | 989,500.00 | -58,271.05 | -5.56% |
| Operating Transfers | 15,248,492.12 | 14,062,827.22 | 13,115,527.00 | -947,300.22 | -6.74% |
| Other Objects | 370,854.44 | 419,687.26 | 362,125.00 | -57,562.26 | -13.72% |
| General | 188,770,479.32 | 113,744,541.83 | 120,684,879.00 | 6,940,337.17 | 6.10% |
| Ending Fund Balance | 23,052,923.14 | 23,466,527.80 | 23,466,527.80 | 0.00 | 0% |
REVENUES – FUND 27
The following chart and table illustrate the district’s SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 27 revenues, from all sources, beginning with the 2018-19 fiscal year to the current 2020-2021 fiscal year. As earlier noted, the State of Wisconsin increased special education cost reimbursement from 24.8% to 30%. The district’s operating transfer increased, even with additional state support. The fluidity of the Fund 27 budget is due in part to the reduced federal support resulting from the reduction of allowed, prior year carryover of federal funds.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Transfers | 12,148,492.12 | 12,462,827.22 | 13,115,527.00 | 652,699.78 | 5.24% |
| Rev. State Sources | 4,114,827.00 | 4,370,564.66 | 5,266,333.00 | 895,768.34 | 20.50% |
| Rev. Federal Sources | 3,168,303.22 | 2,961,182.66 | 2,533,671.00 | -427,511.66 | -14.44% |
| Special Education Fund | 19,431,822.34 | 19,794,674.54 | 20,915,531.00 | 1,120,856.46 | 5.66% |
EXPENSES – FUND 27
The following chart and table illustrate the district’s GENERAL FUND 27 expenses, all objects, beginning with the 2018-19 fiscal year to the current 2020-2021 fiscal year. Salaries and benefits account for 93% of special education costs. As people are the district’s primary resource and method of educational delivery, both Fund 10 and 27 salary and benefit expenses account for 77.7% of all expenses.
| Expenses by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saleries | 13,233,126.25 | 13,482,908.16 | 14,436,089.00 | 953,180.84 | 7.07% |
| Employee Benefits | 4,512,948.38 | 4,943,868.05 | 5,000,305.00 | 56,436.95 | 1.14% |
| Purchased Service | 1,492,052.71 | 1,306,105.96 | 1,382,599.00 | 76,453.04 | 5.85% |
| Non-Capital Objects | 11,675.75 | 41,028.75 | 90,228.00 | 49,199.25 | 120% |
| Capital Objects | 74,922.75 | 14,964.14 | 0 | -14,964.14 | -100% |
| Other Objects | 7,096.50 | 5,799.48 | 6,350.00 | 550.52 | 9.5% |
| Special Edcuation Fund | 19,431,822.34 | 19,794,674.54 | 20,915,531.00 | 1,120,856.46 | 5.66% |
REVENUES & EXPENSES – FUNDS 38 & 39, DEBT SERVICE
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the district’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the district’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. It should be noted that in 2019 the district refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis. The 2019-2020 activity of $10,075,000 accounts for the refinancing. Note, debt is levied on the calendar year, but paid in the fiscal year.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Local Sources | 2,943,834.40 | 3,010,539.20 | 2,786,218.00 | -224,321.20 | -7% |
| Other Financing SOU | 0 | 10,075,000.00 | 0 | -10,075,000.00 | -100% |
| Other Revenue | 455,876.54 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Non-Referendum Debt | 3,389,710.94 | 13,05,539.20 | 2,786,218.00 | -10,299,321.20 | -71% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Retirement | 2,957,770.00 | 13,026,708.83 | 2,905,735,.00 | -10,120,973.83 | -78% |
| Operating Transfers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Non-Referendum Debt | 2,957,770.00 | 13,02,708.83 | 2,905,735.00 | -10,120,973.83 | -78% |
Fund 39 – Referendum Approved Debt
Debt Retierment
The district’s Fund 39 debt relates the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools. The 2019 the district took advantage of a strategy, to pre-pay debt, allowing for savings and the restructuring of debt retiring in 2028. The district is again planning to pre-pay $4,980,000 of debt.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Transfers | 0 | 371.81 | 0 | -371.81 | -100% |
| Revenue Local Sources | 6,704,400.29 | 9,790,185.62 | 9,693,688.00 | -96,497.62 | -1% |
| Other Revenue | 1,514.82 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Debt Service Fund | 6,705,915.11 | 9,790,557.43 | 9,693,688.00 | -96,869.43 | -1% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt Retirement | 6,774,443.76 | 9,806,301.04 | 9,772,238.00 | -34,063.04 | 0% |
| Other Objects | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Debt Service Fund | 6,774,443.76 | 9,806,301.04 | 9,772,238.00 | -34,063.04 | 0% |
REVENUES & EXPENSES – FUND 46, LONG TERM CAPITAL MAINTENANCE
In 2015 the Board of Education acted to establish a long-term capital maintenance fund which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in Fund 46 is usually accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 at the conclusion of a fiscal year and before July 30. As the 2020-2021 is an unusual fiscal year, dominated by COVID-19 and subsequent loss of revenue related to the Janesville International Exchange Program and open enrollment, Fund 46 is needed to cover normal, large ticket capital maintenance items. Should district expenses not be fully exercised as budgeted, it is recommended that unspent funds be used to cover capital maintenance rather than using Fund 46 funds. Past practice has been for administration to present options for projected un-spent funds. Discussion regarding such options will include Fund 46.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Transfers | 3,100,000.00 | 1,600,000.00 | 0 | -1,600,000.00 | -100% |
| Revenue Local Sources | 52,971.20 | 101,571.61 | 105,000.00 | 3,428.39 | 3% |
| Other Revenue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Long Term Capital | 3,152,971.20 | 1,701,571.61 | 105,000.00 | -1,596,571.61 | -94% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchased Service | 0 | 0 | 1,186,952.00 | 1,186,952.00 | 100% |
| Long Term Capital | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1,186,952.00 | 1,186,952.00 | 100% |
| Ending Fund Balance | 4,583,881.00 | 6,285,452.61 | 5,203,500.61 | -1,081,952.00 | -17% |
REVENUES & EXPENSES – FUND 50, FOOD SERVICE
The district self operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program. During on the onslaught of COVID-19 the food service program served over 175,689 meals between March and August.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Transfers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Revenue Local Sources | 1,145,402.56 | 838,132.88 | 288,750.00 | -549,382.88 | -66% |
| Rev State Source | 115,605.99 | 110,496.71 | 0 | -110,496.71 | -100% |
| Rev Federal Source | 4,039,549.43 | 4,179,454.96 | 4,138,900.00 | -40,554.96 | -1% |
| Other Revenue | 521.20 | 13,330.17 | 12,000.00 | -1,330.17 | -10% |
| Food Service FUnd | 5,301,078.78 | 5,141,414.72 | 4,439,650.00 | -701,764.72 | -14% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saleries | 1,754,987.42 | 1,801,211.26 | 1,770,722.00 | -30,489.26 | -2% |
| Emplyoee Benefits | 456,322.57 | 443,987.71 | 469,493.00 | 25,505.29 | 6% |
| Purchased Service | 221,849.94 | 135,064.21 | 90,624.00 | -44,440.21 | -33% |
| Non-Capital Objects | 2,847,804.71 | 2,826,556.97 | 2,203,235.00 | -623,321.97 | -22% |
| Capital Objects | 155,487.69 | 8,613.76 | 424,874.00 | 416,260.24 | 4833% |
| Operating Transfers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Other Objects | 27,687.50 | 27,067.32 | 31,425.00 | 4,357.68 | 16% |
| Food Service Fund | 5,464,139.83 | 5,242,501.23 | 4,990,373.00 | -252,128.23 | -5% |
| Ending Fund Balance | 1,587,294.00 | 1,486,207.49 | 935,484.49 | -550,723.00 | -37% |
REVENUES & EXPENSES – FUND 73, OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
The district established a Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post-employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. Typically, the district makes both annual contributions and withdrawals to the fund. It should be noted the district’s expenses related to post-employment benefits is decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits. The 2019-2020 increase in revenue relates to district-wide savings in other expense areas, resulting the ability to transfer funds, identified as other revenue.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Local Sources | 62,672.86 | 43,205.72 | 40,000.00 | -3,205.72 | -7% |
| Other Revenue | 1,382,287.42 | 3,247,038.45 | 121,673.00 | -3,125,365.45 | -96% |
| Pension-Other Emplyee Ben | 1,444,960.28 | 3,290,244.17 | 161,673.00 | -3,128,571.17 | -95% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Objects | 1,979,674.65 | 1,718,446.49 | 1,472,109.00 | -246,337.49 | -14% |
| Pension-Other Emplyee Ben | 1,979,674.65 | 1,718,446.49 | 1,472,109.00 | -246,337.49 | -14% |
| Ending Fund Balance | 4,323,726.00 | 5,804,523.68 | 4,494,087.68 | -1,310,436.00 | -23% |
REVENUE & EXPENSES – FUND 21, SPECIAL REVENUE TRUST FUND
Fund 21 holds gifts and donations to the district that can be used for district operations
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Local Sources | 499,591.91 | 799,610.48 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Other Revenue | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Special Revenue Trust Fund | 499,591,91 | 799,610.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saleries | 6,701.15 | 3,384.85 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Emplyoee Benefits | 874.23 | 426.52 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Purchased Service | 138,402.38 | 114,148.53 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Non-Capital Objects | 225,019.22 | 276,572.51 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Capital Objects | 25,248.27 | 19,204.97 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Other Objects | 42,028.70 | 75,926.85 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Special Revenue Trust Fund | 60,784.96 | 489,664.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Ending Fund Balance | 381,885.06 | 691,831.31 | 691,831.31 | 0.00 | 0% |
REVENUE & EXPENSES – FUND 80, COMMUNITY SERVICE
In 2019 the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy with the Fund 80, Community Service, mechanism.
| Revenue by Type (Source) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Local Sources | 79,572.59 | 197,929.61 | 50,000.00 | -147,929.61 | -75% |
| Community Service | 79,572.59 | 197,929.61 | 50,000.00 | -147,929.61 | -75% |
| Expense by Type (Object) | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchased Service | 732.15 | 33,686.06 | 0 | -33,686.06 | -100% |
| Non-Capital Objects | 76,995.85 | 85,259.75 | 50,000.00 | -35,259.75 | -41% |
| Community Service | 77,728.00 | 118,945.81 | 50,000.00 | -68,945.81 | -58% |
| Ending Fund Balance | 17,077.79 | 96,061.59 | 96,061.59 | 0.00 | 0% |
ENROLLMENT & MEMBERSHIP
Enrollment is essentially the district’s head count of students on any given school day. All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count identifies a district’s membership of actively public educated students attending the School District of Janesville or other public schools. The result of the count yields a membership number which is used to calculate the district’s revenue limit. Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value. The following chart illustrates the September membership, not including summer school, and September enrollment. Like most Wisconsin school districts, COVID-19 has had a negative impact on the district’s enrollment and membership, which is expected to rebound for 2021-2022. The district’s second Friday in January pupil count will be a key factor in the 2021-2022 budget development process.
REVENUE LIMIT AUTHORITY
In 1993 the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2004-2005, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowing increase per member on a threeyear average.
Base revenue is key to a district’s long-term financial health. The best comparable data point between district is base revenue, line seven of the revenue limit worksheet. The district’s base revenue has been decreasing over time, as non-recurring exemptions expire. The recent uptick in 2020-2021 relates to the low revenue limit ceiling increasing to $10,000 per member, up from $9,700. The district’s need to seek an operating referendum is a direct result of decreasing membership and decreasing base revenue, each of which are factored in to the district’s financial forecast model.
PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION
The district’s mil rate has remained steady the past two years at $8.48, following a decline from $10.06 in 2013-2014. The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2013-2014.
ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
Historically, the School District of Janesville and Milton have had the lowest rates in Rock County. Milton has not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018-19 to 2019-20.
2020-2021 TAX LEVY
The district’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the district. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
2020-2021 TAX LEVY
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and the 2019-2020 levy by municipality.
LEVY BY FUND
| Propery Tax Levy | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Fund 10 | 27,683,640.00 | 27,983,099.00 | 29,683,125.00 | 1,700,026.00 | 6.08% |
| Debt Srvice Fund 38 | 2,929,570.00 | 2,927,898.00 | 2,781,218.00 | -146,680.00 | -5.01% |
| Debt Srvice Fund 39 | 6,688,134.00 | 9,773,713.00 | 9,683,688.00 | -90,025.00 | -0.92% |
| Community Service Fund 80 | 0.00 | 50,000.00 | 50,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
| Property Charge Back | 220,620.00 | 175,264.00 | 175,264.00 | 151,455.00 | 636% |
| Property Tax Levy | 37,521,964.00 | 42,373,295.00 | 42,373,295.00 | 1,614,776.00 | 3.96% |
| PI 401 | 2018-19 FY Activity |
2019-20 FY Activity |
2020-21 Original Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Janesville | 34,038,776.81 | 37,106,153.00 | 38,417,028.15 | 1,310,875.15 | 3.53% |
| Town of Milton | 6,585.54 | 6,981.00 | 7,455.05 | 474.05 | 6.79% |
| Town of Janesville | 1,612,018.88 | 1,705,456.00 | 1,855,607.25 | 150,151.25 | 8.80% |
| Town of La Prairie | 389,214.04 | 406,289.00 | 432,958.86 | 26,669.86 | 6.56% |
| Town of Rock | 1,475,368.73 | 1,533,640.00 | 1,660245.69 | 126,605.69 | 8.26% |
| PI 401 | 37,521,964.00 | 40,758,519.00 | 42,373,295.00 | 1,614,776.00 | 3.96% |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – REVENUES, FUND 10
| General Fund (Fund 10) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning Fund Balance (Account 930 000) | 23,019,134.26 | 23,052,923.14 | 23,433,527.80 |
| Ending Fund Balance (Acct. 935 000) | 250,741.52 | (1,281,893.68) | 0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance (Acct. 936 000) | 0.00 | 239,277.87 | 0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance (Acct. 937 000) | 100,000.00 | 100,000.00 | 0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance (Acct. 938 000) | 1,144,747.19 | 2,641,309.36 | 0.00 |
| Ending Fund Balance (Acct. 939 000) | 21,557,434.43 | 21,767,834.25 | 0.00 |
| Total Ending Fund Balance (Acct. 930 000) | 23,052,923.14 | 23,466,527.80 | 23,466,527.80 |
| Revenues & Other Financing Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Transfers-in | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Local Sources 210 Taxes |
27,988,710.16 | 28,097,872.23 | 30,060,337.00 |
| 240 Payments fo r Services | 938,065.00 | 889,000.00 | 555,408.00 |
| 260 Non-Capital Sales | 39,503.85 | 34,682.34 | 0.00 |
| 270 School Activity Income | 181,780.11 | 140,766.06 | 780.00 |
| 280 Interest on Investments | 183,597.02 | 101,861.45 | 50,000.00 |
| 290 Other Revenue Local Sources | 897,611.07 | 565,337.45 | 256,070.00 |
| Subtotal Local Sources | 30,229,278.21 | 29,829,519.53 | 30,922,595.00 |
| Other School Districts WIthin Wisconsin | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 310 Transit of Aids | 9,005.19 | 10,824.45 | 0.00 |
| 340 Payments for Services | 4,346,165.19 | 4,573,322.00 | 4,605,091.00 |
| 380 Medical Service Reimbursements | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 390 Other Inter-district Within Wi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School Districts WIthin Wisconsin | 4,355,170.38 | 4,584,146.45 | 4,605,091.00 |
| Other School Districts Outside Wisconsin | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 440 Payments for Services | 378,793.31 | 209,090.71 | 0.00 |
| 490 Other Inter-District, Outside Wisconsin | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School DistrictsOutside Wisconsin | 378,793.31 | 209,090.71 | 0.00 |
| Intermediate Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 510 Transit of Aids | 28,714.00 | 21,172.96 | 5,600.00 |
| 530 Payments for Services from CCDEB | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 540 Payments for Services from CESA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 580 Medical Services Reimbursement | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 590 Other intermediate Sources | 71.10 | 42,672.91 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Intermediate Sources | 28,785.10 | 63,672.91 | 5,600.00 |
| State Source | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 610 State Aid - Categorical | 499,686.18 | 597,441.56 | 521,683.00 |
| 620 State Aid - General | 65,755,588.00 | 65,221,202.00 | 65,414,721.00 |
| 630 DPI Special Project Grants | 708,078.28 | 253,249.37 | 178,593.00 |
| 640 Payments for Services | 141,728.00 | 261,454.00 | 200,000.00 |
| 650 Student Acievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE Grant) | 635,648.75 | 728,352.88 | 544,464.00 |
| 660 Other State Revenue Through Local Units | 743.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 690 Other Revenue | 7,420,876.04 | 7,615,090.05 | 7,262,720.00 |
| Subtotal State Source | 75,162,348.34 | 74,676,789.86 | 74,122,181.00 |
| Federal Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 710 Federal Aid - Categorical | 110,269.00 | 114,345.64 | 98,093.00 |
| 720 Impact Aid | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 730 DPI Special Project Grant | 1,346,859.21 | 1,146,130.68 | 4,818,464.00 |
| 750 IASA Grants | 2,527,020.84 | 2,329,260.39 | 2,573,613.00 |
| 760 JTPA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 770 Other Federal Revenue Through Local Units | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 780 Other Federal Revenue Through State | 759,580.48 | 764,727.25 | 606,000.00 |
| 790 Other Federal Revenue Direct | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Federal Sources | 4,743,729.53 | 4,354,463.96 | 8,096,170.00 |
| Other Financing Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 850 Reorganization Settlement | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 860 Compensation, Fixed Assets | 25,500.00 | 27,000.00 | 0.00 |
| 870Long-Term Obligations | 798,819.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other Financing Sources | 824,319.00 | 27,00.00 | 2,692,994.00 |
| Other Revenues | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 Ajustments | 2,566,240.78 | 13,683.00 | 0.00 |
| 970 Refund of Disbursement | 468,797.75 | 319,530.68 | 175,248.00 |
| 990 Miscellaneous | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other Revenues | 46,805.80 | 80,076.43 | 65,000.00 |
| Total Revenues & Other Finacing Sources | 118,804,268.20 | 114,158,146.49 | 120,684,879.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTON FORMAT – EXPENSES BY FUNCTION, FUND 10
| Instruction | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 000 Undifferentiated Curriculum | 24,321,724.80 | 23,721,117.74 | 24,236,844.00 |
| 120 000 Regular Curriculum | 18,885,754.64 | 19,079,375.56 | 20,546,372.00 |
| 130 000 Vocational Curriculum | 3,651,598.79 | 3,740,677.55 | 3,563,588.00 |
| 140 000 Physical Curriculum | 3,241,036.05 | 3,335,150.69 | 3,175,137.00 |
| 160 000 Co-Curricular Activities | 1,431,478.86 | 1,256,607.16 | 770,669.00 |
| 170 000 Other Special Needs | 5,391,762.78 | 5,308,351.12 | 7,403,780.00 |
| Subtotal Instructions | 56,923,355.92 | 56,441,279.82 | 59,896,390.00 |
| Support Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 210 000 Pupil Services | 4,370,686.70 | 4,158,905.82 | 4,758,673.00 |
| 220 000 Instructional Staff Services | 7,729,571.34 | 7,034,834.56 | 8,413,473.00 |
| 230 000 General Administration | 1,020,811.49 | 1,102,006.55 | 1,141,838.00 |
| 240 000 School Building Administration | 5,893,877.73 | 6,056,200.50 | 6,136,835.00 |
| 250 000 Business Administration | 16,255,528.91 | 14,079,441.56 | 13,833,893.00 |
| 260 000 Central Services | 2,549,448.60 | 2,063,223.06 | 1,863,210.00 |
| 270 000 Insurance & Judgments | 1,069,520.74 | 1,075,915.70 | 1,017,500.00 |
| 280 000 Deb Services | 92,993.12 | 185,965.08 | 890,335.00 |
| 290 000 Other Support Services | 2,947,403.67 | 2,545,812.37 | 2,830,179.00 |
| Subtotal Support Sources | 41,929,842.30 | 38,302,305.20 | 40,885,936.00 |
| Non-Program Transactions | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 410 000 Inter-fund Transfers | 15,248,492.12 | 14,062,827.22 | 13,115,527.00 |
| 430 000 Instructional Service Payments | 4,620,905.48 | 4,756,685.62 | 6,602,026.00 |
| 490 000 Other Non-Program Transactions | 47,883.50 | 181,443.97 | 185,000.00 |
| Subtotal Non-Program Transactions | 19,917,281.10 | 19,000,956.81 | 19,902,553.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | 118,770,479.32 | 113,744,541.83 | 120,684,879.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT - SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND, FUND 21
Fund 21, Special Revenue Trust Fund is used to account for trust funds, such as student activity accounts, building and district level gifts and donations.
| Special Project Funds (Fund 21, 23, 29) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | 321,100.10 | 381,885.06 | 691,831.31 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | 381,885.06 | 691,831.31 | 691,831.31 |
| Revenues & Other Financing Sources | 499,058.91 | 799,610.48 | 0.00 |
| 100 000 Instruction | 356,649.92 | 414,040.68 | 0.00 |
| 200 000 Support Services | 81,038.21 | 73,465.55 | 0.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | 585.82 | 2,158.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Expendtures & Other Financing Uses | 438,273.95 | 489,664.23 | 0.00 |
Special Education
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – SPECIAL EDUCATION, FUND 27 REVENUES
| SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (FUND 27) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Revenues & Other Financing Services | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Transfers-in | 12,148,492.12 | 12,462,827.22 | 13,115,527.00 |
| Local Sorces 240 Payments for Service |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 260 Non-Capital Sales | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 270 School Activity Income | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 290 Other Revenue, Local Sources | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Local Sorces | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Other School Districts Within Wisconsin | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 310 Transit of Aids | 200.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 340 Payments For Services | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 380 Medical Service Reimbursements | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 390 Other Inter-district, within Wi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School Districts Within Wisconsin | 200.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Other School Districts Outside Wisconsin | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 440 Payments For Services | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 440 Other Inter-district, within Wi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other School Districts Outside Wisconsin | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Intermediate Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 510 Transit of Aids | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 530 Payments for Services from CCDEB | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 540 Payments for Services from CCDEB | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 580 Medical Services Reimbursement | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 590 Other Inter-district, within Wi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Intermediate Sources | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| State Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 610 State Aid - Categorical | 3,931,332.00 | 4,210,307.00 | 5,156,333.00 |
| 620 State Aid - Categorical | 104,095.00 | 44,824.00 | 30,000.00 |
| 630 DPI Special Project Grants | 0.00 | 24,738.66 | 0.00 |
| 640 Payments for Services | 51,400.00 | 34,695.00 | 30,000.00 |
| 650 Achievement gap Reduction (ARG grant) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 690 Other Revenue | 28,000.00 | 56,000.00 | 50,000.00 |
| Subtotal State Sources | 4,114,827.00 | 4,370,564.66 | 5,266,333.00 |
| Federal Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 710 Federal Aid - Categorical | 27,827.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 730 DPI Special Project Grants | 2,317,373.93 | 2,461,158.07 | 2,133,671.00 |
| 750 IASA Grants | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 760 JTPA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 770 Other Federal Revenue Through Local Units | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 780 Other Federal Revenue Through State | 823,102.29 | 500,024.59 | 400,000.00 |
| 790 Other Federal Revenue Direct | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Federal Sources | 3,168,303.22 | 2,961,182.66 | 2,533,671.00 |
| Other Financing Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 960 Adjustments | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 970 Refund of Disbursement | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 990 Miscellaneous | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Other Financing Sources | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | 19,431,822,.34 | 19,794,674.54 | 20,915,531.00 |
BUDGETE ADOPTION FORMAT – SPECIAL EDUCATION, FUND 27 EXPENSES
| Instruction | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 000 Undefferentiated Curriculum | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 120 000 Regular Curriculum | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 130 000 Vocational Curriculum | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 140 000 Physical Curriculum | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 150 000 Special Education Curriculum | 14,197,821.96 | 14,891,089.16 | 15,791,772.00 |
| 160 000 Co- Curricular Activities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 170 000 Other Special Needs | 147,729.92 | 157,309.01 | 152,504.00 |
| Subtotal Instruction | 14,345,551.88 | 15,048,398.17 | 15,944,276.00 |
| Support Sources | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 210 000 Pupil Services | 2,434,994,.08 | 2,455,285.92 | 2,540,381.00 |
| 220 000 Instructional Staff | 997,621.90 | 824,407.94 | 805,914.00 |
| 230 000 General Administration | 3,748.50 | 19,742.66 | 17,000.00 |
| 240 000 School Building Administration | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 250 000 Business Administration | 14,197,821.96 | 14,891,089.16 | 15,791,772.00 |
| 260 000 Central Services | 24,949.83 | 6,853.03 | 5,000.00 |
| 270 000 Insurance & Judgements | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 280 000 Debt Services | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 290 000 Other Support Services | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Support Sources | 4,890,241.34 | 4,377,586.69 | 4,861,204.00 |
| Non-Program Transactions | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 410 000 Ubter-fund Transfers | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 430 000 Instructional Service Payments | 196,029.12 | 368,689.68 | 110,051.00 |
| 490 000 Other Non-Program Transactions | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Subtotal Non-Program Transactions | 196,029.12 | 368,689.68 | 110,051.00 |
| Total Expendtures & Other Financing Uses | 19,431,822.34 | 19,794,674.54 | 20,915,531.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUNDS 38 & FUND 39, DEBT SERVICE
| Debt Service Fund (Funds 38, 39) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | 992,595.41 | 1,356,007.70 | 1,399,094.46 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | 1,356,007.70 | 1,399,094.46 | 1,201,027.46 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | 10,095,626.05 | 22,876,096.63 | 12,479,906.00 |
| 281 000 Long-Term Capital Debt | 8,453,096.76 | 11,483,151.04 | 12,677,973.00 |
| 282 000 Refinancing | 0.00 | 10,070,338.83 | 0.00 |
| 283 000 Operational Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 285 000 Post Emplyment Benefit Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 289 000 Other Long-Term General Obligation Debt | 1,279,120.00 | 1,279,520.00 | 0.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | 9,732,213.76 | 22,833,009.87 | 12,677,973.00 |
| 842 000 Indebtedness, End of Year | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUND 46, CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
| Capital Projects Fund (Funds 41,46,48,49) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | 7,119,221.76 | 4,584,252.19 | 6,285,452.35 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | 4,584,252.19 | 6,285,452.35 | 5,203,500.35 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | 3,181,353.47 | 1,701,571.97 | 105,000.00 |
| 100 000 Instructional Service | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 200 000 Support Services | 5,716,323.04 | 0.00 | 1,186,952.00 |
| 300 000 Community Service | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | 0.00 | 371.81 | 0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | 5,716,323.04 | 371.81 | 1,186,952.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUND 50, FOOD SERVICE
| Food Service Fund (Fund 50) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | 1,750,355.03 | 1,587,293.98 | 1,486,207.47 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | 1,587,293.98 | 1,486,207.47 | 1,114,168.47 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | 5,301,078.78 | 5,141,414.72 | 4,439,650.00 |
| 200 000 Support Services | 5,464,139.83 | 5,242,501.23 | 4,811,689.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | 5,464,139.83 | 5,242,501.23 | 4,811,689.00 |
BUDGET ADOPTION FORMAT – FUND 80, COMMUNITY SERVICE
| Community Service Fund (Fund 80) | Audited 2018-19 |
Unaudited 2019-20 |
Budget 2020-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 000 Beginning Fund Balance | 15,233.20 | 17,077.79 | 96,061.59 |
| 900 000 Ending Fund Balance | 17,077.79 | 96,061.59 | 96,061.59 |
| Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources | 79,572.59 | 197,929.61 | 50,000.00 |
| 200 000 Support Services | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 300 000 Community Service | 77,728.00 | 118,945.81 | 50,000.00 |
| 400 000 Non-Program Transactions | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Expenditures & Other Financing Uses | 77,728.00 | 118,945.81 | 50,000.00 |
2024-2025 Budget Book
ADA Compliant Budget Book For 2024-2025
Budget Book 2024-25
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2024-25
- School District of Janesville
- Introduction / District Overview
- District Funds
- Building the Budget
- General Fund (10) Revenues / Expenses
- Special Education
- General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
- Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
- Capital Funds (46 & 49)
- Food Service
- Employee Benefits Trust Fund
- Special Revenue Trust Fund
- Enrollment & Membership
- Revenue Limit Authority
- Property Tax Information
- Tax Levy
- Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
School District of Janesville
Introduction / District Overview
NTRODUCTION
The Business Services Group is pleased to present the 2023-24 School District of Janesville (“SDJ”) budget.
A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 24, 2023. As a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the District is receiving federal grants to support its response. The
District is using funds to offer a robust online instruction platform, reduce class size at the elementary
level, maintain secondary instructional pathways, invest in sanitation efforts, install bottle filling stations,
provide personal protective equipment such as face masks, and improve indoor air quality. In aggregate,
the District will receive over $27 million in federal funding through three different Elementary and
Secondary School Emergency Relief (“ESSER”) and Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (“GEER”)
Funds. The funds are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis, meaning the District must incur costs and
then be reimbursed. Some of these funds are received by the District and are required to be allocated to
private schools. Some of these federal funds were used during the 2020-21 through 2022-23 fiscal years,
and most of the remainder will be used during the 2023-24 fiscal year. A portion may carryover to fiscal
year 2024-25. Of the remaining funds, a portion will be used for indoor air quality at Franklin Middle
School and social distancing in greenhouses at Craig and Parker High Schools.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves over 9,300 pre-kindergarten through 12th grade students in 20
schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are
provided in two comprehensive high schools (9-12), three middle schools (6-8), twelve elementary schools
(K-5), and twelve P4J Community Partnership sites (4-year-old early learners). In addition, we serve
students in three charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, and Arise Virtual
Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom
as life-long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. The District is ensuring that every
graduate is college and/or career ready.
In November 2020, the District received support from electors in the form of two referenda. The first
provides $22.5 million for safety, security, and facility improvements. The second provides four years of
support in addition to our revenue limit to meet operational needs of the District. The operating
referendum provides an additional $11.5 million for 2023-24 to support:
- ongoing investment in curricular resources such as language arts
- maintain instructional technology for students and staff
- preserve reasonable class sizes
- attract and retain qualified educators and support staff
BUDGET DOCUMENT
The 2024-25 budget is being presented by fund. Prior-year data presented are actual values and not
budgeted amounts. The 2023-24 actual data have been subject to audit, but as of the release of the
budget, are not yet available in report form.
The data presented are not a collection of program-oriented budgets displaying what each program costs,
but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas describing the purpose for which
expenditures are made. This is consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements
(“WUFAR”) structure and the budget presentation format required by §65.90, Wis. Stats. Narrative
explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document to provide additional
context.
The budget is based upon information known and decisions made through October 18, 2024. The October
15 certification of general/equalization aid and related adjustments to the revenue limit computation are
incorporated in to the budget presented here. However, additional modifications to the budget may
occur prior to the budget hearing and levy certification meeting.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving
short-term and long-term strategic direction and the financial health of the District.
On behalf of the entire Business Services Group, we look forward to an exciting and successful school year
in 2024-25.
Dan McCrea, SFO
Chief Financial Officer
Matthew Sylvester-Knudtson, CPA
Director of Finance
Tami Carlson
Financial Analyst / Grants Mgr.
October 18, 2024
District Funds
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally-accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on-going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place
certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund $146,787,035
- Special Education Fund $25,433,544
- Debt Service Funds $8,748,094
- Capital Funds $7,185,323
- Food Service Fund $6,400,000
- Community Svc. Fund $200,000
- All-Fund Expenditures $194,753,996
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures:
Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post-employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
Building the Budget
The budget development process generally begins the December prior to start of the fiscal year and is when budget assumptions are developed based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget and local determinations.
2024-25 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS – APRIL 2024 (ACTUAL in blue)
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process. Additionally, budget assumptions consider the district’s mission driven long-term fiscal health. The following sections provide an overview of the budget development assumptions:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present, and the Board of Education will adopt, a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The district will model the effect of pre-paying (defeasing) its long-term Fund 38 and 39 debt obligations. District Administration will propose defeasing Fund 38 in 2024 and 2025, thereby eliminating Fund 38 WRS Debt.
- The District will secure a line of credit for the 2024-25 fiscal year, related to the historically low November cash point, prior to the December state aid payment.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- Final ESSER III expenses need to be incurred by September 30, 2024.
- Property values are assumed to increase by 3%. Decrease of approximately 2%.
REVENUE
Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2024-25 per pupil categorical aid increase $0.00 per FTE. Unchanged.
State Equalization Aid
- The 2024-25 Statewide General Equalization Aid will increase $225,000,000 over the prior year. Increases in state aid off set the local levy, all else equal. The actual increase for the District is $3,801,723.
Categorical Aid
- Targeted reimbursement for special education funding will remain unchanged from the current legislated amount of approximately 33%. Actual aid received in 2023-24 was 32.4% of prior year expenses.
Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit will increase $325 per FTE. A base FTE, using the September FTE count will be used. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2015 – 9,898
- b. 2016 – 9,780
- c. 2017 – 9,668
- d. 2018 – 9,528
- e. 2019 – 9,370
- f. 2020 – 9,070
- g. 2021 – 9,051
- h. 2022 – 9,108
- i. 2023 – 9,118
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 76. Actual 76.
- Independent Charter School (ICS) membership count is estimated to increase from 25 to 32. Actual 25.5.
- The District will be in year four, $14,500,000, of a four-year non-recurring operational referendum to exceed revenue limit authority.
Open Enrollment / Tuition Programs (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- For budget planning purposes, the District’s September open enrollment-in will remain status quo at 576, net of the 14 JIEP students, and open enrollment-out will remain at 588. Actual open enrollment in as of 3rd Friday is 587 and open enrollment out is 610.
Fund 10 & 27 Grant Revenue, State and Federal Sources
- Federal and State grant award revenue will be budgeted at prior year levels.
EXPENSES
- The District will utilize a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2023-24 expenses, less administrative recommendations.
- The District will forecast a 4.12% increase in base wages, subject to allowable July 1, 2024. CPI-U percentage. The base wage increase amounts to a 3% increase for certified staff totaling $1,572,008.
- The District will budget for a TBD increase in health insurance and model various plan design options designed to recruit and retain talent. Actual approximately 11%.
- The District will budget for a 5% increase in dental insurance.
- The District will budget a 5% increase transportation expenses
- The District will budget a 5% increase in utility expenses.
STAFFING
- Staffing plan assumptions are developed within the guidelines established by Board Policy 4221. In support of district goals, administration may recommend alternative staffing ratios at targeted grade levels.
General Fund (10) Revenues / Expenses
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2022-23 fiscal year to current. Budgeted revenues include approximately $4 million less ESSER and similar funding compared to the prior year, and approximately $2 million more of revenue compared to the prior year due to a new lease in 2024-25. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 2.8%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 58% is derived from state sources and 30% from local sources.
| Revenues by Source | 2022-23 Actual | 2023-24 Actual | 2024-25 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $ 32,581,602 | $42,497,754 | $44,411,808 | $1,914,054 | 4.5% |
| Other School Districts | $4,910,786 | $5,015,103 | $5,228,000 | $212,897 | 4.2% |
| Intermediate | $14,118 | $88,941 | $94,179 | $5,238 | 5.9% |
| State | $79,253,497 | $81,448,316 | $85,172,104 | $3,723,788 | 4.6% |
| Federal | $9,976,463 | $15,003,729 | $9,69.,473 | $(5,310,256) | -35.4% |
| Other | $4,344,850 | $1,230,503 | $2,187,471 | $956,968 | 77.8% |
| Total | $131,081,316 | $145,284,346 | $146,787,035 | $1,502,689 | 1.0% |
Special Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – REVENUES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The projected increase in revenue is due, in part, to some staff costs in being expensed to the IDEA Flow Through grants in 2023-24 and a higher transfer from Fund 10.
| Revenue By source |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfers | $11,794,453 | $12,094,933 | $13,093,724 | $988,791 | 8.3% |
| Other School Districts | 16,340 | 27,146 | 25,000 | (2,146) | -7.9% |
| State | 5,120,965 | 5,558,802 | 5,795,000 | 236,198 | 4.2% |
| Federal | 3,468,703 | 3,475,156 | 3,752,356 | 277,200 | 8.0% |
| Total | $20,400,461 | $21,156,037 | $22,666,080 | $1,510,043 | 7.1% |
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) expenses beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. As noted in the March 2023 staffing report, 4.5 FTE additional instructional special education staff were added.
| Expenses By Function |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $15,133,492 | $15,882,432 | $17,307,757 | $1,425,325 | 9.0% |
| Pupil Services | 2,802,821 | 2,819,576 | 2,719,032 | (100,544) | -3.6% |
| Instructional Staff Serv. | 854,094 | 853,918 | 951,085 | 97,167 | 11-4% |
| General Admin. | 16,570 | 20,362 | 20,000 | (362) | -1.8% |
| Business Admin. | 1,203,886 | 1,172,806 | 1,248,206 | 75,400 | 6.4% |
| Central Services | 16,891 | 16,187 | 25,000 | 8,813 | 54.4% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 239,669 | 390,756 | 395,000 | 4,244 | 1.1% |
| Other Transactions | 133,038 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | $20,400,461 | $21,156,037 | $22,666,080 | $1,510,043 | 7.1% |
General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
GENERAL OPERATING FUNDS (10 AND 27)
Over half of the financial support for special education services is provided via a transfer from the General Fund (10). Because of this reliance, and because special education is a component of the broad instructional services the District provides, these funds are occasionally blended. When done so, the net totals may be considered the District’s operating budget. The values illustrated are net of the inter-fund transfer.
| Revenues: | 2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $33,127,642 | $32,581,602 | $41,804,243 | $9,222,641 | 28.3% |
| Other School Districts | 5,170,719 | 4,937,932 | 5,053,000 | 115,068 | 2.3% |
| Intermediate | 9,400 | 8,000 | 0 | (8,000) | -100.0% |
| State | 81,123,349 | 84,812,299 | 86,812,299 | 1,516,667 | 1.8% |
| Federal | 11,545,303 | 13,451,619 | 19,112,426 | 5,660,807 | 42.1% |
| Other | $137,890,869 | $140,142,420 | $152,559,335 | $12,416,915 | 8.9% |
| Expenses: | 2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $74,044,518 | $79,527,602 | $80,642,769 | $1,115,167 | 1.4% |
| Pupil Services | 7,192,699 | 8,.365,841 | 8,807,629 | 441,788 | 5.3% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 11,430,134 | 9,470,496 | 10,141,754 | 671,258 | 7.1% |
| General Admin. | 799,732 | 660,883 | 676,896 | 16,013 | 2.4% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,619,469 | 6,699,261 | 7,306,901 | 607,640 | 9.1% |
| Central Services | 16,635,686 | 17,497,560 | 24,491,270 | 6,993,710 | 40.0% |
| Insruance & Judgement | 1,678,712 | 1,939,285 | 2,067,673 | 128,388 | 6.6% |
| Debt Service | 919,493 | 927,865 | 1,173,000 | 245,135 | 26.4% |
| Other Support Svcs | 5,407,910 | 2,624,487 | 2,630,000 | 5,513 | 0.2% |
| Transfers | 4,140,859 | 3,109,565 | 3,452,443 | 342,878 | 11.0% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 1,500,000 | 1,160,000 | 2,500,000 | 1,340,000 | 115.5% |
| Other Transactions | 275,083 | 310,029 | 150,000 | (160,029) | -51.6% |
| Total Expenses | $137,056,710 | $139,540,426 | $152,559,335 | $13,018,909 | 9.3% |
| Fund Balance | $24,862,069.69 | $25,464,065.03 | $25,464,065.03 | $0 | 0.0% |
Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the District’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the District’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. In 2019, the District refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis.
Debt service is levied on the calendar year basis, but budgeted for on the fiscal year basis. For 2023-24, a transfer of $2.5 million from Fund 10 is included in the budget. These funds will be used to defease retirement-system related debt. At the end of the 2023-24, the following debt balances will be outstanding. The anticipated 2023- 24 defeasance has not been factored into these balances.
- Act 32 $4,715,000
- Retirement-system $6,270,000
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $2,758,183 | $2,749,068 | $2,755,308 | $6,240 | 0.2% |
| Transfers | 0 | 0 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 0.0% |
| Other Revenue | 1,041 | 25,024 | 20,000 | (5,024) | -20.1 |
| Total Revenue | 2,759,224 | 2,774,092 | 5,275,308 | 2,501,216 | 90.2% |
| Principal | 2,365,000 | 2,415,000 | 4,775,000 | 2,360,000 | 97.7% |
| Interest | 422,313 | 364,053 | 504,083 | 140,030 | 38.5% |
| Total Expenses | 2,787,313 | 2,779,053 | 5,279,083 | 2,500,030 | 90.0% |
| Fund Balance | $782,497.22 | $777,536.59 | $773,761.59 | $(3,775) | -05% |
Fund 39 – Referendum Approved Debt
The District’s Fund 39 debt relates to the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools, and the 2020 capital referendum. The 2023-24 budget does not include an allowance for defeasing Fund 39 debt.
At the end of the 2023-24, the following debt balances will be outstanding.
- 2016 Issuance $4,745,000
- 2020 Issuance $2,585,000
| Fund 39 Non-Referendum Debt |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $13,291,143 | $14,333,123 | $6,858,789 | $(7,474,334) | -52.1% |
| Other Revenue | 934,065 | 77,668 | 70,000 | (7,668) | -9.9% |
| Total Revenue | 14,225,208 | 14,410,791 | 6,928,789 | (7,482,002) | -51.9% |
| Principal | 12,415,900 | 13,663,900 | 6,445,000 | (7,218,900) | -52.8% |
| Interest | 1,226,381 | 976,825 | 551,055 | (425,770) | -43.6% |
| Other | 15,900 | 13,900 | 0 | (13,900) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | 13,958,181, | 14,654,625 | 6,996,055 | (7,658,570) | -52.3% |
| Fund Balance | $659,592.73 | $429,658.65 | $362,392.65 | $(67,266) | -15.7% |
Capital Funds (46 & 49)
Fund 46 – Long-Term Capital Improvement
In 2015, the Board of Education acted to establish a long-term capital improvement fund, which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in this fund is accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 during a given fiscal year or no later than July 30 following fiscal-year-end. Budgeted expenses for 2023-24 relate to capital projects at Edison and Franklin Middle Schools and Craig and Parker High Schools.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Improv. |
20121-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $1,500,000 | $1,160,000 | $0 | $(1,160,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 7,282 | 167,007 | 100,000 | (67,007) | -40.1% |
| Total Revenue | 1,507,282 | 1,327,007 | 100,000 | (1,227,007) | -92.5% |
| Construction- Related | 0 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,00,000 | 0.0% |
| Other | 16,908 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 16,908 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Fund Balance | $11,281,047.74 | $12,676,826.22 | $7,776,826.22 | $(4,900,000) | -38.7% |
Fund 49 – Capital Projects
Upon issuance of the 2020 referendum‐approved debt, a capital projects fund was established to account for the costs associated with those projects.
| Fund 49 Captial Projects |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Revenue | $30,251 | $496,823 | $200,000 | $(296,823) | 59.7% |
| Total Revenue | $30,251 | $496,823 | $200,000 | (296,823) | 59.7% |
| Construction-Related | 9,082,157 | 5,713,070 | 8,061,409 | 2,348,339 | 41.1% |
| Total Expenses | 9,082,157 | 5,713,070 | 8,061,409 | 2,348,339 | 41.1% |
| Fund Balance | $13,077,656.38 | $7,861,409.59 | $0.59 | $(7,861,409) | -100.0% |
Food Service
The District self-operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program.
Included in the Fund 50 budget is an approximately 5.7% market adjustment to wages ($67,000 including FICA and WRS) for specific student nutrition staff groups.
| Fund 50 Food Service |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Sales | $418,543 | $1,007,193 | $1,000,000 | $ (7,193) | -0.7% |
| State | 0 | 80,081 | 77,000 | (3,081) | -3.8% |
| Federal | 6,905,577 | 5,427,261 | 4,993,000 | (434,261) | -8.0% |
| Other Revenue | 26,450 | 123,999 | 80,000 | (43,999) | -35.5% |
| Total Revenue | 7,350,570 | 6,638,534 | 6,150,000 | (488,534) | -7.4% |
| Maintenance/ Facilities | 66,683 | 33,312 | 33,077 | (235) | -0.7% |
| Food Service | 5,605,004 | 5,851,825 | 6,059,935 | 208,110 | 3-.6% |
| Internal Services | 46,416 | 47,540 | 51,988 | 4,448 | 9.4% |
| Other | 7,779 | 6,360 | 5,000 | (1,360) | 3.6% |
| Total Expenses | $5,725,882 | $5,939,037 | $6,150,000 | $210,963 | 3.6% |
| Fund Balance | $3,288,940.09 | $3,988,437.04 | $3,988,437.04 | $0 | 0.0% |
Employee Benefits Trust Fund
The District established Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post-employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. The District, generally, makes both annual contributions to and withdrawals from the fund. The District’s expenses related to post-employment benefits are decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits. As a fiduciary fund, a budget is not required to be established for Fund 73.
| Fund 73 OPEB Trust |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Contributions | $3,500,000 | $2,677,573 | $0 | $(2,677,573) | -100.0% |
| Retiree Contributions | 114,014 | 161,031 | 0 | (161,031) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 5,696 | 198,832 | 0 | (198,832) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 3,619,710 | 3,037,436 | 0 | (3,037,436) | -100.0% |
| Benefits Paid | 1,202,439 | 1,395,719 | 0 | (2,200,395) | -100.0% |
| Implicit Rate Subsidy | 649,154 | 804,676 | 0 | (804,676) | -100.0% |
| Other | 10,417 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $1,862,010 | $2,200,395 | $0 | $(2,200,395) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $8,250,697.65 | $9,087,738.31 | $9,087,738.31 | $0 | 0.0% |
Special Revenue Trust Fund
Fund 21 accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
As donations and expenditures are not always known, a budget is not established for Fund 21.
| Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donations | $527,529 | $533,108 | $0 | $(533,108) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 419,828 | 231,331 | 0 | (231,331) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 947,357 | 764,439 | 0 | (764,439) | -100.0% |
| Instructional | 459,058 | 588,670 | 0 | (588,670) | -100.0% |
| Support Services | 81,924 | 588,670 | 0 | (102,623) | -100.0% |
| Scholarships | 14,003 | 17,798 | 0 | (102,623) | -100.0% |
| Other | 16,419 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 571,404 | 691,293 | 0 | (691,293) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $1,053,552.45 | $1,108,901.46 | $1,108,901.460 | $0 | 0.0% |
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND (80)
In 2019, the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy utilizing a
Fund 80 levy as a financial vehicle. For 2023-24, the levy includes $25,000 in support of Bags of
Hope staff. A substantial amount of revenue, via donations, flow through Fund 80 to support
community programs (e.g., Bags of Hope).
| Fund 80 Community Service |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $175,00 | $175,000 | $200,000 | $25,000 | 14.3% |
| Donations | 150,345 | 151,487 | 0 | (151,487) | -100% |
| Total Revenue | 325,345 | 326,487 | 200,000 | (126,487) | -38.7% |
| Early Literacy | 89,683 | 151,393 | 175,000 | 23,061 | 15.2% |
| Bags of Hope | 118,506 | 122,417 | 25,000 | (74,356) | -27.1% |
| Total Expenses | 208,189 | 274,356 | 200,000 | (74,356) | -27.1% |
| Fund Balance | $261,346.11 | $313,477.64 | $313,477.64 | $0 | 0.0% |
Enrollment & Membership
All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count generates a membership count of students actively attending the School District of Janesville or any other public school (“Members”). This count is used to calculate the District’s revenue limit, by factoring the full-time equivalency (FTE) of each student (“Membership FTE”). Enrollment represents the headcount of students attending any school within the District, regardless of school district residency.
Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value. The following chart illustrates the September enrollment, members, and membership FTE. Summer school FTE is not included.
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | 10,385 | 10,310 | 10,275 | 10,146 | 10,063 |
| Members | 10,263 | 10,165 | 10,039 | 9,935 | 9,825 |
| Membership FTE | 9,992 | 9,898 | 9,780 | 9,668 | 9,528 |
Revenue Limit Authority
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a three year rolling average
Base revenue is key to a District’s long-term financial health. One of the best comparable data points between and among school districts is base revenue (line seven of the revenue limit worksheet). The District’s base revenue has been decreasing over time as non-recurring exemptions expire. The uptick for 2023-24 relates to the low revenue limit ceiling increasing to $11,000 per member, up from $10,000. The District’s need to seek an operating referendum was a direct result of decreasing membership and decreasing base revenue, each of which are factored into the District’s financial forecast model.
Property Tax Information
The District’s property tax is frequently measured in an amount per $1,000 of property value (milrate). The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2014-15. The recent mil rate reductions are due, in part, to a higher-than-average increase in equalized property values.
2022-23 ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
Historically, the School Districts of Janesville and Milton have had the lowest rates in Rock County. Milton had not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018-19 to 2019-20. Prior year data is illustrated as current year mil rates have not yet been set.
Tax Levy
The District’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the District. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and by municipality.
| Levy (By Fund) |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Fund | $30,751,626 | $29,733,685 | $40,412,701 | $10,679,016 | 35.9% |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | 2,758,183 | 1,749,068 | 2,755,308 | 6,240 | 0.2% |
| Referendum, Debt. Svc | 13,291,143 | 14,333,123 | 6,858,789 | (7,474,334) | -52.1% |
| Community Sercices | 175,000 | 175,000 | 200,000 | 25,000 | 14.3% |
| Chargeback | 18,752 | 3,828 | 1,002 | (2,826) | -73.8% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704 | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $3,233,096 | 6.9% |
| Levy (By Municipality) |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Janesville | $42,674,714 | $42,724,866 | $45,626,026 | $2,901,160 | 6.8% |
| Town of Harmony | 7,669 | 7,334 | 7,879 | 545 | 7.4% |
| Town of Janesville | 1,990,918 | 2,063,704 | 2,157,649 | 93,945 | 4.6% |
| Town of La Prairie | 494,651 | 444,105 | 517,059 | 72,954 | 16.4% |
| Town of Rock | 1,826,752 | 1,754,695 | 1,919,187 | 164,492 | 9.4% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704.00 | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $3,233,096 | 6.9% |
Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
Budget Books
2024-2025 Budget Book
ADA Compliant Budget Book For 2024-2025
Budget Book 2024-25
ADA Compliant Budget Book 2024-25
- School District of Janesville
- Introduction / District Overview
- District Funds
- Building the Budget
- General Fund (10) Revenues / Expenses
- Special Education
- General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
- Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
- Capital Funds (46 & 49)
- Food Service
- Employee Benefits Trust Fund
- Special Revenue Trust Fund
- Enrollment & Membership
- Revenue Limit Authority
- Property Tax Information
- Tax Levy
- Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
School District of Janesville
Introduction / District Overview
NTRODUCTION
The Business Services Group is pleased to present the 2023-24 School District of Janesville (“SDJ”) budget.
A balanced budget is being presented to the Board of Education for approval on October 24, 2023. As a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the District is receiving federal grants to support its response. The
District is using funds to offer a robust online instruction platform, reduce class size at the elementary
level, maintain secondary instructional pathways, invest in sanitation efforts, install bottle filling stations,
provide personal protective equipment such as face masks, and improve indoor air quality. In aggregate,
the District will receive over $27 million in federal funding through three different Elementary and
Secondary School Emergency Relief (“ESSER”) and Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (“GEER”)
Funds. The funds are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis, meaning the District must incur costs and
then be reimbursed. Some of these funds are received by the District and are required to be allocated to
private schools. Some of these federal funds were used during the 2020-21 through 2022-23 fiscal years,
and most of the remainder will be used during the 2023-24 fiscal year. A portion may carryover to fiscal
year 2024-25. Of the remaining funds, a portion will be used for indoor air quality at Franklin Middle
School and social distancing in greenhouses at Craig and Parker High Schools.
DISTRICT OVERVIEW
The School District of Janesville serves over 9,300 pre-kindergarten through 12th grade students in 20
schools. As one the largest school districts in the State of Wisconsin, our instructional programs are
provided in two comprehensive high schools (9-12), three middle schools (6-8), twelve elementary schools
(K-5), and twelve P4J Community Partnership sites (4-year-old early learners). In addition, we serve
students in three charter schools: Rock University High School, Rock River Charter School, and Arise Virtual
Academy. The District is committed to preparing our students to enter the world beyond the classroom
as life-long learners with strong academic skills and a sense of self. The District is ensuring that every
graduate is college and/or career ready.
In November 2020, the District received support from electors in the form of two referenda. The first
provides $22.5 million for safety, security, and facility improvements. The second provides four years of
support in addition to our revenue limit to meet operational needs of the District. The operating
referendum provides an additional $11.5 million for 2023-24 to support:
- ongoing investment in curricular resources such as language arts
- maintain instructional technology for students and staff
- preserve reasonable class sizes
- attract and retain qualified educators and support staff
BUDGET DOCUMENT
The 2024-25 budget is being presented by fund. Prior-year data presented are actual values and not
budgeted amounts. The 2023-24 actual data have been subject to audit, but as of the release of the
budget, are not yet available in report form.
The data presented are not a collection of program-oriented budgets displaying what each program costs,
but rather, a cost accounting budget presented by functional areas describing the purpose for which
expenditures are made. This is consistent with the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Accounting Requirements
(“WUFAR”) structure and the budget presentation format required by §65.90, Wis. Stats. Narrative
explanations detailing the WUFAR system are provided throughout the document to provide additional
context.
The budget is based upon information known and decisions made through October 18, 2024. The October
15 certification of general/equalization aid and related adjustments to the revenue limit computation are
incorporated in to the budget presented here. However, additional modifications to the budget may
occur prior to the budget hearing and levy certification meeting.
So as to meet the needs of students, careful administration of the budget plan is essential to achieving
short-term and long-term strategic direction and the financial health of the District.
On behalf of the entire Business Services Group, we look forward to an exciting and successful school year
in 2024-25.
Dan McCrea, SFO
Chief Financial Officer
Matthew Sylvester-Knudtson, CPA
Director of Finance
Tami Carlson
Financial Analyst / Grants Mgr.
October 18, 2024
District Funds
Wisconsin school finance practices and generally-accepted accounting principles require that the District segregate financial transactions into distinct accounting entities, called funds. Funds are used to report on-going annual costs of operating the district, to account for capital projects financed through borrowing, or to place
certain revenues and expenses in a trust. SDJ utilizes the following funds for budgetary purposes:
- General Fund $146,787,035
- Special Education Fund $25,433,544
- Debt Service Funds $8,748,094
- Capital Funds $7,185,323
- Food Service Fund $6,400,000
- Community Svc. Fund $200,000
- All-Fund Expenditures $194,753,996
Debt service funds include all transactions related to the payment of general obligation debt and refinancing of debt.
Capital funds are created whenever acquired resources are restricted for the acquisition or construction of specific capital projects or purchase of capital items.
The community service fund allows for the segregation of financial transactions related to community use of facilities and programs operated for the benefit of the entire community.
All revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for each fund are accounted for separately and reported to DPI.
The District also operates and manages the following funds, which are not included in total budgeted District expenditures:
Employee Benefit Trust Fund (Fund 73) – The OPEB Trust Fund accounts for resources held in trust for post-employment benefit plans legally established as an irrevocable trust.
Special Revenue Trust Fund (Fund 21) – Accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
Building the Budget
The budget development process generally begins the December prior to start of the fiscal year and is when budget assumptions are developed based on the State of Wisconsin’s biennial budget and local determinations.
2024-25 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS – APRIL 2024 (ACTUAL in blue)
Budget development assumptions create parameters, at a high level, that guide both administration and the Board of Education during the budget modeling and development process. Additionally, budget assumptions consider the district’s mission driven long-term fiscal health. The following sections provide an overview of the budget development assumptions:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- District Administration will present, and the Board of Education will adopt, a balanced budget that meets the needs of the District’s students.
- The District’s fund balance will not be utilized for recurring expenses.
- The district will model the effect of pre-paying (defeasing) its long-term Fund 38 and 39 debt obligations. District Administration will propose defeasing Fund 38 in 2024 and 2025, thereby eliminating Fund 38 WRS Debt.
- The District will secure a line of credit for the 2024-25 fiscal year, related to the historically low November cash point, prior to the December state aid payment.
- The Board will utilize its full authority to levy within the allowable revenue limit.
- Final ESSER III expenses need to be incurred by September 30, 2024.
- Property values are assumed to increase by 3%. Decrease of approximately 2%.
REVENUE
Per Student Categorical Aid (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- The 2024-25 per pupil categorical aid increase $0.00 per FTE. Unchanged.
State Equalization Aid
- The 2024-25 Statewide General Equalization Aid will increase $225,000,000 over the prior year. Increases in state aid off set the local levy, all else equal. The actual increase for the District is $3,801,723.
Categorical Aid
- Targeted reimbursement for special education funding will remain unchanged from the current legislated amount of approximately 33%. Actual aid received in 2023-24 was 32.4% of prior year expenses.
Revenue Limit Authority
- The allowable revenue limit will increase $325 per FTE. A base FTE, using the September FTE count will be used. Preceding September FTE counts have been:
- a. 2015 – 9,898
- b. 2016 – 9,780
- c. 2017 – 9,668
- d. 2018 – 9,528
- e. 2019 – 9,370
- f. 2020 – 9,070
- g. 2021 – 9,051
- h. 2022 – 9,108
- i. 2023 – 9,118
- For budget planning purposes the District’s summer school student FTE will remain at 76. Actual 76.
- Independent Charter School (ICS) membership count is estimated to increase from 25 to 32. Actual 25.5.
- The District will be in year four, $14,500,000, of a four-year non-recurring operational referendum to exceed revenue limit authority.
Open Enrollment / Tuition Programs (outside the district’s revenue limit authority)
- For budget planning purposes, the District’s September open enrollment-in will remain status quo at 576, net of the 14 JIEP students, and open enrollment-out will remain at 588. Actual open enrollment in as of 3rd Friday is 587 and open enrollment out is 610.
Fund 10 & 27 Grant Revenue, State and Federal Sources
- Federal and State grant award revenue will be budgeted at prior year levels.
EXPENSES
- The District will utilize a cast forward model consisting of the budgeted 2023-24 expenses, less administrative recommendations.
- The District will forecast a 4.12% increase in base wages, subject to allowable July 1, 2024. CPI-U percentage. The base wage increase amounts to a 3% increase for certified staff totaling $1,572,008.
- The District will budget for a TBD increase in health insurance and model various plan design options designed to recruit and retain talent. Actual approximately 11%.
- The District will budget for a 5% increase in dental insurance.
- The District will budget a 5% increase transportation expenses
- The District will budget a 5% increase in utility expenses.
STAFFING
- Staffing plan assumptions are developed within the guidelines established by Board Policy 4221. In support of district goals, administration may recommend alternative staffing ratios at targeted grade levels.
General Fund (10) Revenues / Expenses
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s General Fund (10) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2022-23 fiscal year to current. Budgeted revenues include approximately $4 million less ESSER and similar funding compared to the prior year, and approximately $2 million more of revenue compared to the prior year due to a new lease in 2024-25. Without the two aforementioned sources, revenues would have increased approximately 2.8%. In the context of all Fund 10 revenues, approximately 58% is derived from state sources and 30% from local sources.
| Revenues by Source | 2022-23 Actual | 2023-24 Actual | 2024-25 Budget | Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $ 32,581,602 | $42,497,754 | $44,411,808 | $1,914,054 | 4.5% |
| Other School Districts | $4,910,786 | $5,015,103 | $5,228,000 | $212,897 | 4.2% |
| Intermediate | $14,118 | $88,941 | $94,179 | $5,238 | 5.9% |
| State | $79,253,497 | $81,448,316 | $85,172,104 | $3,723,788 | 4.6% |
| Federal | $9,976,463 | $15,003,729 | $9,69.,473 | $(5,310,256) | -35.4% |
| Other | $4,344,850 | $1,230,503 | $2,187,471 | $956,968 | 77.8% |
| Total | $131,081,316 | $145,284,346 | $146,787,035 | $1,502,689 | 1.0% |
Special Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – REVENUES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) revenues, by source, beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. The projected increase in revenue is due, in part, to some staff costs in being expensed to the IDEA Flow Through grants in 2023-24 and a higher transfer from Fund 10.
| Revenue By source |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfers | $11,794,453 | $12,094,933 | $13,093,724 | $988,791 | 8.3% |
| Other School Districts | 16,340 | 27,146 | 25,000 | (2,146) | -7.9% |
| State | 5,120,965 | 5,558,802 | 5,795,000 | 236,198 | 4.2% |
| Federal | 3,468,703 | 3,475,156 | 3,752,356 | 277,200 | 8.0% |
| Total | $20,400,461 | $21,156,037 | $22,666,080 | $1,510,043 | 7.1% |
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND (27) – EXPENSES
The following chart and table illustrate the District’s Special Education Fund (27) expenses beginning with the 2021-22 fiscal year to the current fiscal year. As noted in the March 2023 staffing report, 4.5 FTE additional instructional special education staff were added.
| Expenses By Function |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $15,133,492 | $15,882,432 | $17,307,757 | $1,425,325 | 9.0% |
| Pupil Services | 2,802,821 | 2,819,576 | 2,719,032 | (100,544) | -3.6% |
| Instructional Staff Serv. | 854,094 | 853,918 | 951,085 | 97,167 | 11-4% |
| General Admin. | 16,570 | 20,362 | 20,000 | (362) | -1.8% |
| Business Admin. | 1,203,886 | 1,172,806 | 1,248,206 | 75,400 | 6.4% |
| Central Services | 16,891 | 16,187 | 25,000 | 8,813 | 54.4% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 239,669 | 390,756 | 395,000 | 4,244 | 1.1% |
| Other Transactions | 133,038 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | $20,400,461 | $21,156,037 | $22,666,080 | $1,510,043 | 7.1% |
General Operation Funds (10 and 27)
GENERAL OPERATING FUNDS (10 AND 27)
Over half of the financial support for special education services is provided via a transfer from the General Fund (10). Because of this reliance, and because special education is a component of the broad instructional services the District provides, these funds are occasionally blended. When done so, the net totals may be considered the District’s operating budget. The values illustrated are net of the inter-fund transfer.
| Revenues: | 2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local | $33,127,642 | $32,581,602 | $41,804,243 | $9,222,641 | 28.3% |
| Other School Districts | 5,170,719 | 4,937,932 | 5,053,000 | 115,068 | 2.3% |
| Intermediate | 9,400 | 8,000 | 0 | (8,000) | -100.0% |
| State | 81,123,349 | 84,812,299 | 86,812,299 | 1,516,667 | 1.8% |
| Federal | 11,545,303 | 13,451,619 | 19,112,426 | 5,660,807 | 42.1% |
| Other | $137,890,869 | $140,142,420 | $152,559,335 | $12,416,915 | 8.9% |
| Expenses: | 2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $74,044,518 | $79,527,602 | $80,642,769 | $1,115,167 | 1.4% |
| Pupil Services | 7,192,699 | 8,.365,841 | 8,807,629 | 441,788 | 5.3% |
| Instructional Staff Svcs. | 11,430,134 | 9,470,496 | 10,141,754 | 671,258 | 7.1% |
| General Admin. | 799,732 | 660,883 | 676,896 | 16,013 | 2.4% |
| School Bldg. Admin. | 6,619,469 | 6,699,261 | 7,306,901 | 607,640 | 9.1% |
| Central Services | 16,635,686 | 17,497,560 | 24,491,270 | 6,993,710 | 40.0% |
| Insruance & Judgement | 1,678,712 | 1,939,285 | 2,067,673 | 128,388 | 6.6% |
| Debt Service | 919,493 | 927,865 | 1,173,000 | 245,135 | 26.4% |
| Other Support Svcs | 5,407,910 | 2,624,487 | 2,630,000 | 5,513 | 0.2% |
| Transfers | 4,140,859 | 3,109,565 | 3,452,443 | 342,878 | 11.0% |
| Instructional Svc. Pmts. | 1,500,000 | 1,160,000 | 2,500,000 | 1,340,000 | 115.5% |
| Other Transactions | 275,083 | 310,029 | 150,000 | (160,029) | -51.6% |
| Total Expenses | $137,056,710 | $139,540,426 | $152,559,335 | $13,018,909 | 9.3% |
| Fund Balance | $24,862,069.69 | $25,464,065.03 | $25,464,065.03 | $0 | 0.0% |
Debt Services Fund (38 & 39)
Fund 38 – Non-Referendum Approved Debt
Fund 38 debt, within the District’s revenue limit authority, accounts for debt related to the merger of the two Wisconsin retirement systems and the District’s use of the Act 32 Energy Exemption for work related to facility improvements, predominately at Edison Middle School, replacing outdated boilers and other mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Act 32 is no longer available for Wisconsin school districts. In 2019, the District refinanced debt related to the merged retirement systems saving $1,566,860 or $150,000 a year on an annual basis.
Debt service is levied on the calendar year basis, but budgeted for on the fiscal year basis. For 2023-24, a transfer of $2.5 million from Fund 10 is included in the budget. These funds will be used to defease retirement-system related debt. At the end of the 2023-24, the following debt balances will be outstanding. The anticipated 2023- 24 defeasance has not been factored into these balances.
- Act 32 $4,715,000
- Retirement-system $6,270,000
| Fund 38 Non-Referendum Debt |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $2,758,183 | $2,749,068 | $2,755,308 | $6,240 | 0.2% |
| Transfers | 0 | 0 | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | 0.0% |
| Other Revenue | 1,041 | 25,024 | 20,000 | (5,024) | -20.1 |
| Total Revenue | 2,759,224 | 2,774,092 | 5,275,308 | 2,501,216 | 90.2% |
| Principal | 2,365,000 | 2,415,000 | 4,775,000 | 2,360,000 | 97.7% |
| Interest | 422,313 | 364,053 | 504,083 | 140,030 | 38.5% |
| Total Expenses | 2,787,313 | 2,779,053 | 5,279,083 | 2,500,030 | 90.0% |
| Fund Balance | $782,497.22 | $777,536.59 | $773,761.59 | $(3,775) | -05% |
Fund 39 – Referendum Approved Debt
The District’s Fund 39 debt relates to the 2006 approved referendum for the purpose of building renovations at Craig and Parker High Schools, and various elementary schools, and the 2020 capital referendum. The 2023-24 budget does not include an allowance for defeasing Fund 39 debt.
At the end of the 2023-24, the following debt balances will be outstanding.
- 2016 Issuance $4,745,000
- 2020 Issuance $2,585,000
| Fund 39 Non-Referendum Debt |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $13,291,143 | $14,333,123 | $6,858,789 | $(7,474,334) | -52.1% |
| Other Revenue | 934,065 | 77,668 | 70,000 | (7,668) | -9.9% |
| Total Revenue | 14,225,208 | 14,410,791 | 6,928,789 | (7,482,002) | -51.9% |
| Principal | 12,415,900 | 13,663,900 | 6,445,000 | (7,218,900) | -52.8% |
| Interest | 1,226,381 | 976,825 | 551,055 | (425,770) | -43.6% |
| Other | 15,900 | 13,900 | 0 | (13,900) | -100.0% |
| Total Expenses | 13,958,181, | 14,654,625 | 6,996,055 | (7,658,570) | -52.3% |
| Fund Balance | $659,592.73 | $429,658.65 | $362,392.65 | $(67,266) | -15.7% |
Capital Funds (46 & 49)
Fund 46 – Long-Term Capital Improvement
In 2015, the Board of Education acted to establish a long-term capital improvement fund, which could not be utilized until five years after its inception. Investing in this fund is accomplished by transferring funds from Fund 10 to 46 during a given fiscal year or no later than July 30 following fiscal-year-end. Budgeted expenses for 2023-24 relate to capital projects at Edison and Franklin Middle Schools and Craig and Parker High Schools.
| Fund 46 Long-Term Cap. Improv. |
20121-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | $1,500,000 | $1,160,000 | $0 | $(1,160,000) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 7,282 | 167,007 | 100,000 | (67,007) | -40.1% |
| Total Revenue | 1,507,282 | 1,327,007 | 100,000 | (1,227,007) | -92.5% |
| Construction- Related | 0 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,00,000 | 0.0% |
| Other | 16,908 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 16,908 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0.0% |
| Fund Balance | $11,281,047.74 | $12,676,826.22 | $7,776,826.22 | $(4,900,000) | -38.7% |
Fund 49 – Capital Projects
Upon issuance of the 2020 referendum‐approved debt, a capital projects fund was established to account for the costs associated with those projects.
| Fund 49 Captial Projects |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Revenue | $30,251 | $496,823 | $200,000 | $(296,823) | 59.7% |
| Total Revenue | $30,251 | $496,823 | $200,000 | (296,823) | 59.7% |
| Construction-Related | 9,082,157 | 5,713,070 | 8,061,409 | 2,348,339 | 41.1% |
| Total Expenses | 9,082,157 | 5,713,070 | 8,061,409 | 2,348,339 | 41.1% |
| Fund Balance | $13,077,656.38 | $7,861,409.59 | $0.59 | $(7,861,409) | -100.0% |
Food Service
The District self-operates its school food service program, absent from the local levy, serving breakfast and lunch in participation with the United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program.
Included in the Fund 50 budget is an approximately 5.7% market adjustment to wages ($67,000 including FICA and WRS) for specific student nutrition staff groups.
| Fund 50 Food Service |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Sales | $418,543 | $1,007,193 | $1,000,000 | $ (7,193) | -0.7% |
| State | 0 | 80,081 | 77,000 | (3,081) | -3.8% |
| Federal | 6,905,577 | 5,427,261 | 4,993,000 | (434,261) | -8.0% |
| Other Revenue | 26,450 | 123,999 | 80,000 | (43,999) | -35.5% |
| Total Revenue | 7,350,570 | 6,638,534 | 6,150,000 | (488,534) | -7.4% |
| Maintenance/ Facilities | 66,683 | 33,312 | 33,077 | (235) | -0.7% |
| Food Service | 5,605,004 | 5,851,825 | 6,059,935 | 208,110 | 3-.6% |
| Internal Services | 46,416 | 47,540 | 51,988 | 4,448 | 9.4% |
| Other | 7,779 | 6,360 | 5,000 | (1,360) | 3.6% |
| Total Expenses | $5,725,882 | $5,939,037 | $6,150,000 | $210,963 | 3.6% |
| Fund Balance | $3,288,940.09 | $3,988,437.04 | $3,988,437.04 | $0 | 0.0% |
Employee Benefits Trust Fund
The District established Fund 73 as a mechanism to account for post-employment benefit obligations such as health insurance. The District, generally, makes both annual contributions to and withdrawals from the fund. The District’s expenses related to post-employment benefits are decreasing over time, related to the reduction of such benefits. As a fiduciary fund, a budget is not required to be established for Fund 73.
| Fund 73 OPEB Trust |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Contributions | $3,500,000 | $2,677,573 | $0 | $(2,677,573) | -100.0% |
| Retiree Contributions | 114,014 | 161,031 | 0 | (161,031) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 5,696 | 198,832 | 0 | (198,832) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 3,619,710 | 3,037,436 | 0 | (3,037,436) | -100.0% |
| Benefits Paid | 1,202,439 | 1,395,719 | 0 | (2,200,395) | -100.0% |
| Implicit Rate Subsidy | 649,154 | 804,676 | 0 | (804,676) | -100.0% |
| Other | 10,417 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | $1,862,010 | $2,200,395 | $0 | $(2,200,395) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $8,250,697.65 | $9,087,738.31 | $9,087,738.31 | $0 | 0.0% |
Special Revenue Trust Fund
Fund 21 accounts for gifts and donations to the District.
As donations and expenditures are not always known, a budget is not established for Fund 21.
| Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donations | $527,529 | $533,108 | $0 | $(533,108) | -100.0% |
| Other Revenue | 419,828 | 231,331 | 0 | (231,331) | -100.0% |
| Total Revenue | 947,357 | 764,439 | 0 | (764,439) | -100.0% |
| Instructional | 459,058 | 588,670 | 0 | (588,670) | -100.0% |
| Support Services | 81,924 | 588,670 | 0 | (102,623) | -100.0% |
| Scholarships | 14,003 | 17,798 | 0 | (102,623) | -100.0% |
| Other | 16,419 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total Expenses | 571,404 | 691,293 | 0 | (691,293) | -100.0% |
| Fund Balance | $1,053,552.45 | $1,108,901.46 | $1,108,901.460 | $0 | 0.0% |
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND (80)
In 2019, the Board of Education embraced the opportunity to support early literacy utilizing a
Fund 80 levy as a financial vehicle. For 2023-24, the levy includes $25,000 in support of Bags of
Hope staff. A substantial amount of revenue, via donations, flow through Fund 80 to support
community programs (e.g., Bags of Hope).
| Fund 80 Community Service |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount |
Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levy | $175,00 | $175,000 | $200,000 | $25,000 | 14.3% |
| Donations | 150,345 | 151,487 | 0 | (151,487) | -100% |
| Total Revenue | 325,345 | 326,487 | 200,000 | (126,487) | -38.7% |
| Early Literacy | 89,683 | 151,393 | 175,000 | 23,061 | 15.2% |
| Bags of Hope | 118,506 | 122,417 | 25,000 | (74,356) | -27.1% |
| Total Expenses | 208,189 | 274,356 | 200,000 | (74,356) | -27.1% |
| Fund Balance | $261,346.11 | $313,477.64 | $313,477.64 | $0 | 0.0% |
Enrollment & Membership
All Wisconsin school districts conduct a third Friday in September count as well as second Friday in January count. The September count generates a membership count of students actively attending the School District of Janesville or any other public school (“Members”). This count is used to calculate the District’s revenue limit, by factoring the full-time equivalency (FTE) of each student (“Membership FTE”). Enrollment represents the headcount of students attending any school within the District, regardless of school district residency.
Within the revenue limit worksheet, summer school membership is added to the September membership value. The following chart illustrates the September enrollment, members, and membership FTE. Summer school FTE is not included.
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | 10,385 | 10,310 | 10,275 | 10,146 | 10,063 |
| Members | 10,263 | 10,165 | 10,039 | 9,935 | 9,825 |
| Membership FTE | 9,992 | 9,898 | 9,780 | 9,668 | 9,528 |
Revenue Limit Authority
In 1993, the State of Wisconsin instituted revenue limits for Wisconsin public schools. The following table illustrates, since 2005-06, the revenue limits the School District of Janesville has operated under. The identified values indicate the allowable increase per member on a three year rolling average
Base revenue is key to a District’s long-term financial health. One of the best comparable data points between and among school districts is base revenue (line seven of the revenue limit worksheet). The District’s base revenue has been decreasing over time as non-recurring exemptions expire. The uptick for 2023-24 relates to the low revenue limit ceiling increasing to $11,000 per member, up from $10,000. The District’s need to seek an operating referendum was a direct result of decreasing membership and decreasing base revenue, each of which are factored into the District’s financial forecast model.
Property Tax Information
The District’s property tax is frequently measured in an amount per $1,000 of property value (milrate). The following table illustrates the mil rate trend since 2014-15. The recent mil rate reductions are due, in part, to a higher-than-average increase in equalized property values.
2022-23 ROCK COUNTY MIL RATES OVER TIME
Historically, the School Districts of Janesville and Milton have had the lowest rates in Rock County. Milton had not carried debt until their recent debt referendum, thus the increase from 2018-19 to 2019-20. Prior year data is illustrated as current year mil rates have not yet been set.
Tax Levy
The District’s tax levy is comprised of five elements, representing four funds and, if applicable any given year, the prior year levy chargeback. The prior year levy chargeback relates to prior year refunds of property taxes as determined by a municipality within the District. The following chart represents the percentage of the levy as it relates to each levy.
The following tables illustrate the tax levy over the course of the past three fiscal years, with the most recent reflected by the change columns, and by municipality.
| Levy (By Fund) |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Fund | $30,751,626 | $29,733,685 | $40,412,701 | $10,679,016 | 35.9% |
| Non-Ref. Debt Svc. | 2,758,183 | 1,749,068 | 2,755,308 | 6,240 | 0.2% |
| Referendum, Debt. Svc | 13,291,143 | 14,333,123 | 6,858,789 | (7,474,334) | -52.1% |
| Community Sercices | 175,000 | 175,000 | 200,000 | 25,000 | 14.3% |
| Chargeback | 18,752 | 3,828 | 1,002 | (2,826) | -73.8% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704 | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $3,233,096 | 6.9% |
| Levy (By Municipality) |
2021-22 Actual |
2022-23 Actual |
2023-24 Budget |
Change Amount | Change Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Janesville | $42,674,714 | $42,724,866 | $45,626,026 | $2,901,160 | 6.8% |
| Town of Harmony | 7,669 | 7,334 | 7,879 | 545 | 7.4% |
| Town of Janesville | 1,990,918 | 2,063,704 | 2,157,649 | 93,945 | 4.6% |
| Town of La Prairie | 494,651 | 444,105 | 517,059 | 72,954 | 16.4% |
| Town of Rock | 1,826,752 | 1,754,695 | 1,919,187 | 164,492 | 9.4% |
| Total Levy | $46,994,704.00 | $46,994,704 | $50,227,800 | $3,233,096 | 6.9% |
Budget Adoption Format - Revenues, Fund 10
Facilities Use Information
SDJ Facilities Use Request Form.
If you have questions about the use of our facilities, please send a message to sdjfacilitiesusage@janesville.
FACILITY USE FEE SCHEDULE
High Schools
Middle Schools
Facility Use Fee Schedule,
Civic= Not for profit organization Commercial= For profit organization
Auditoriums
Edison: Capacity is 600
Civic:
- Performance up to 4 hours: $100
- Rehersal Hourly Rate: $20
Commercial:
- Performance up to 4 hours: $200
- Rehersal Hourly Rate: $40
Franklin: Capacity is 465
Civic:
- Performance up to 4 hours: $100
- Rehersal Hourly Rate: $20
Commercial:
- Performance up to 4 hours: $200
- Rehersal Hourly Rate: $40
Marshall:
-
Does not have an auditorium to rent
* Performance usage fee is for the first 4 hours or any part thereof. Each hour is prorated hourly charge. Rehearsal should include set up & take down time.
Gymnasium
Edison
Civic
- Gym Compacity 1000
- Competition Gym Hourly Rate: $40
- Locker Rooms: $50
Commercial
- Gym Hourly Rate: $80
- Locker Rooms: $75
Franklin
Civic
- Gym Compacity 1200
- Competition Gym Hourly Rate: $40
- Locker Rooms: $50
Commercial
- Gym Hourly Rate: $80
- Locker Rooms: $75
Marshall
Civic
- Gym Compacity 600
- Gym Hourly Rate: $40
- Locker Rooms: $50
Commercial
- Gym Hourly Rate: $80
- Locker Rooms: $75
* Locker room usage fee represents the cost per locker room and is charged per day for multipule events.
Cafeteria
Edison
Civic
- Compacity 290
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate): $20
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate): $20
Commercial
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate): $40
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate): $40
Franklin
Civic
- Compacity 415
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate): $20
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate): $20
Commercial
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate): $40
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate): $40
Marshall
Civic
- Compacity 300
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate): $20
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate): $20
Commercial
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate): $40
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate): $40
Kitchen usage must be approved through the Manager of Food Services. If a kitchen worker is needed, the group will be charged $27
Computer Labs
Edison
Civic
- Computer Labs (Hourly Rate): $16
- Classrooms (Hourly Rates): $10
Commercial
- Computer Labs (Hourly Rate): $30
- Classrooms (Hourly Rates): $20
Franklin
Civic
- Computer Labs (Hourly Rate): $16
- Classrooms (Hourly Rates): $10
Commercial
- Computer Labs (Hourly Rate): $30
- Classrooms (Hourly Rates): $20
Marshall
Civic
- Computer Labs (Hourly Rate): $16
- Classrooms (Hourly Rates): $10
Commercial
- Computer Labs (Hourly Rate): $30
- Classrooms (Hourly Rates): $20
Pools at all Middle Schools
- Youth Groups- $36 per hour and the group provides a certified lifeguard.
- Adult Groups - $100 per hour and the group provides a certified lifeguard.
Elementary Schools
Facility Use Fee Schedule,
Civic= Not for profit organization Commercial= For profit organization
Gymnasium
Civic:
- Rental (Hourly Rate) $16
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate) $10
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate) $8
Commercial:
- Rental (Hourly Rate) $32
- Cafeteria (Hourly Rate) $20
- Kitchen (Hourly Rate) $16
* Kitchen usage must be approved through the Manager of Food Services. If a kitchen worker is needed, the group will be charged $27
Computer Labs (Hourly Rate)
Civic:
- Rental (Hourly Rate) $16
Commercial:
- Rental (Hourly Rate) $32
Classrooms (Hourly Rate)
Civic:
- Rental (Hourly Rate) $10
Commercial:
- Rental (Hourly Rate) $20
* A school district custodian must be on duty for any rental. If overtime is needed, the group will be charged a custodial fee of $27 per hour per custodian.
Monterey Stadium
Kitchen Use Application
Note: State regulations require the School District of Janesville to maintain food service facilities with all sanitation and health standards required by the State Board of Health Chapter of the Wisconsin Administrative Code PDF Link (HSS 196 - Restaurants).
These standards must be met at all times, including the use of food service facilities for functions other than school meal preparation.
For any entities or groups using the School District of Janesville kitchens, the following must be understood and agreed to prior to any use:
- A School District of Janesville food services representative is required to be at all events.
- This representative will be required to stay until the end of the event until all people are out of the kitchen.
- The cost of the food service personnel will be included in the billed usage cost of utilizing the kitchens. An estimated cost will be provided when the request for usage is submitted.
- All food service equipment (Dish Machine, Convection Ovens, and Cambi Ovens) may only be operated under direct supervision of School District food service representative.
- Prior approval of the Food Service Manager must be obtained before any SDJ. kitchens may be used for school and non-school functions. The following procedure must be used for kitchen use:
- The Food Service Manager must be notified a minimum of three (3) weeks in advance of the requested date(s) for use. The Food Service Manager will notify the Business Services Office if the request to utilize the kitchen facility has been approved.
- Food and paper supplies may be purchased from the Food Services Department with advanced arrangements made with the Food Service Manager. Arrangements must be made at least three (3) weeks before the function.
- Pans, trays, and utensils are not provided but may be checked out for event. The replacement or repair cost of any damaged items will be included in the event billing.
- The cost of cleaning supplies used to clean equipment used will be included in the event billing.
- Clean aprons can be provided for an additional fee.
- Garbage must be placed in the dumpster by the user or building custodian (if on duty) the day of the event.
- All other facility use regulations shall apply.
The user agrees to all conditions of the School Kitchen Facilities Use Form.
User Name {Printed)
User Signature:
Date:
User Contact Telephone Number:
Food Service Manager Name {Printed):
Food Service Manager Signature:
Date
Financial Information - Funds
Types of District Funds
The following listing of district related funds is courtesy of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction as presented in the Wisconsin Uniform Financial Account Requirements (WUFAR).
Fund 10 General Operating Fund
The general fund is used to account for all financial transactions relating to the district’s current operations, except for those required to be accounted for in other funds.
Fund 38 Non Referendum Approved Debt Service
This fund is used to account for transactions for the repayment of debt issues that were either: not authorized by school board resolution before August 12, 1993, or incurred without referendum approval after that date. A fund balance may exist in this fund.
Fund 39 Referendum Approved Debt Service
This fund is used to account for transactions for the repayment of debt issues that were either: authorized by school board resolution before August 12, 1993, or approved by referendum. The district may account for in such referendum approved debt service transactions in Funds 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37 (which are not presently assigned by DPI for reporting purposes) and/or Fund 39. If the district uses funds other than Fund 39, the district must combine and report these funds as Fund 39. A fund balance may exist in this fund.
Fund 80 Community Service Fund
This fund is used to account for activities such as adult education, community recreation programs such as evening swimming pool operation and softball leagues, elderly food service programs, non-special education preschool, day care services, and other programs which are not elementary and secondary educational programs but have the primary function of serving the community. Actual, additional expenditures for these activities, includes salaries, benefits, travel, purchased services, etc. are to be included in this Fund to the extent feasible. The district may adopt a separate tax levy for this Fund.
Other, Non Levy, Funds
Fund 21 Special Revenue Trust Fund
The fund is used to account for trust funds that can be used for district operations. The source of such funds is gifts and donations. Cash and investments in this fund are expended pursuant to donor specifications. There may be a fund balance in this fund.
Fund 27 Special Education Fund
The fund is used to account for the excess cost of providing special education and related services for students with disabilities during the regular school year or extended school year. Also included are charges for services provided to other districts as a result of being a host district for a special education package or cooperative program. School Age Parent costs are also charged to this Fund. No fund balance or deficit can exist in this fund.
Fund 46 Long Term Capital Improvement Trust Fund
A school board with an approved long-term capital improvement plan (minimum of 10 years) may establish a “trust” that is funded with a transfer from the general fund. The contribution from Fund 10 to Fund 46 (Long-term Capital Improvement Trust Fund) is recorded as the expenditure for shared cost and equalization aid purposes. Future expenditures from Fund 46 are not part of shared costs. A school board is prohibited from removing money deposited into Fund 46 for a period of five years after the fund is created. After the initial five year wait period is over, funds may only be used for the purposes identified in the approved long-term capital improvement plan. Fund 46 assets may not be transferred to any other school district fund.
Fund 50 Food Service Fund
Revenues and expenditures related to pupil and elderly food service activities are recorded in this fund. A fund balance in the Food Service Fund is permitted. There may be no deficit in the district’s Food Service Fund. Any food service fund deficit, resulting from student food services, must be eliminated by an operating transfer from the General Fund. Any food service fund deficit, resulting from elderly food services, must be eliminated by a transfer from the district’s Community Service Fund. The maximum that may be transferred if the district does not have a deficit in the Food Service Fund is limited to an amount necessary to cover a current year deficit in a particular food service program (National School Lunch, Breakfast, Ala Carte, etc.)
Fund 60 Student Activity Fund
This fund is used primarily to account for assets held by the district for pupil organizations. Funds held for parent organizations may be accounted for in this fund and are accounted for as a liability to the parent organization. Parent organization funds may be accounted for in Fund 60. The parent organization may not be a separate 501( c) (3) entity. Receipts such as pupil deposits for books, locks, etc; other receipts such as school lunch collections, athletic admissions and other fees may be temporarily deposited to agency fund checking accounts maintained at school locations until these items are remitted the district's business office for placement in required funds.
Only balance sheet accounts for this Fund are reported in the Budget and Annual Reports. However, auxiliary records of receipts and disbursements must be maintained in at locations administering the accounts. Pupil organizations accounted for in this fund may give money to the district. It is recorded as a gift in the receiving fund.
Fund 73 Employee Benefit Trust Fund
This fund is used to account for resources held in trust for formally established defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution plans, or employee benefit plans. Such plans must be legally established in accordance with state statutes, federal laws and Internal Revenue Service requirements. Specific requirements for use of this fund have been established by the Department of Public Instruction. This fund applies to all post-employment benefit plans where the district is providing such benefits by contribution to a legally established irrevocable trust.
Tax Levy Information
WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM (WISCONSIN TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE)
Wisconsin Policy Forum (Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance)
In 2017 the Public Policy Form and Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance merged to create the Wisconsin Policy Forum, a nonpartisan, independent research organization. The mission of the Wisconsin Policy Forum is to “research, analyze and communicate information about the finances, performance, relationship of state and local governmental bodies in the State of Wisconsin to enhance government efficiency and educate citizens and taxpayers.”
Article 1 – Two keys to property tax understanding (pdf)
Article 2 – Understanding property tax surprises (pdf)
Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2019 Taxpayers Guide (pdf)
School Levy Tax Credit
Courtesy of the Wisconsin Association of School Boards (2012)
Part of the state’s commitment to fund education4 comes in the form of the school levy tax credit. What makes this aspect of funding confusing is that, while the state considers these dollars a part of its commitment to education, this credit is not paid directly to schools. Instead they function to offset individual school property tax bills. In effect, through these credits, the state “buy down” a portion of each taxpayer’s property tax bill. In November, when a school district sets it property tax levy, it sets a gross levy amount. In December, when property tax bills are issued, the bills show a net levy amount. The difference is paid by the state through these credits. The amounts allotted through [the levy credit] are based on a formula that generally provides more funds to municipalities that have higher property taxes for schools.
Courtesy of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue
How is the school levy tax credit calculated?
Formula for calculating the school levy tax credit:
Municipality’s 3-Year Average School Levies Statewide
3-Year Average School Levies x Total Funding = Municipality’s Credit
- Is the school levy tax credit paid to the school district? No. The Wisconsin Department of Revenue (DOR) distributes this credit to counties and municipalities. DOR makes the payments directly to the county where the municipality is located and then the county distributes the payment to the municipality.
- When are town, villages and cities notified of the school levy tax credit amount? DOR must inform municipalities of their school levy tax credit payments on or before November 20 of each year.
- How is the school levy tax credit reported on individual property tax bills? On property tax bill, the school levies are reported after subtracting the school levy tax credits. The amount of the school levy tax credit for the current year is listed in a separate box on each property tax bill.
- How does a property owner qualify for the school levy tax credit? The school levy tax credit is applied to every taxable property. The credit amount is based on the property’s assessed value as a percent of the municipality’s total assessed value.
2019 Revenue Guide for Property Owners
Introduction -3
- Introduction This guide provides general information about property assessment and taxation . Contact your local assessor for information about your property assessment and your local clerk for information about your property taxes .
- General Property Defined by state law, general property includes all taxable real and personal property, except property taxed under special provisions (ex: utility, forest crop, woodland tax, and managed forest property) .
- A. Real property, real estate and land The land and all buildings, improvements, fixtures, and rights and privileges connected with the land .
- B. Personal property All goods, wares, merchandise, chattels and effects of any nature or description having any marketable value and not included in real property
- C. Taxable/nontaxable property
All property is taxable unless exempted by state law. Common property types exempt by state law:
- State and municipal property
- Public and private school property
- Cemeteries
- Property used for abatement of air and water pollution
- Household furniture and furnishings
- Manufacturing machinery specific processing equipment
- Apparel and musical instruments for personal use
- Money, bonds and stocks
- Motor vehicles and aircraft
- Livestock, inventories and merchant’s stocks
- Computers and electronic peripheral equipment
- D. Uniform property tax
Article VIII of the State Constitution requires the uniform taxation of property . Article VIII also provides the following property taxation standards:
- Legislature prescribes taxes on forest property
- Taxation of agricultural land and undeveloped land does not need to be uniform with the taxation of other real property
The state legislature enacts all property tax and assessment laws . The property tax assessment laws are covered in Chapter 70 of the Wisconsin Statutes .
III. Assessment and Its Purpose
An assessment is the value an assessor places on your property . This value determines what portion of the local property tax levy is covered by your property .
General property tax components
There are two basic components in any tax, the base and the rate . Multiplying the base times the rate, determines the tax amount .
- Property tax base/rate The base is the value of all taxable property in the district . The clerk calculates the rate after the governing body of the town, village or city determines how much money must be raised from the property tax . In Wisconsin, the town, village,or city treasurer collects property taxes for the municipality, the school, the county and the state .
- The assessor of each taxation district determines the assessed value of all taxable property, with the exception of manufacturing property . The Wisconsin Department of Revenue (DOR) annually assesses all manufacturing property in the state . The assessor is appointed or elected at the local level .
- Assessed value vs. equalized value
- a. Assessed value The value the local assessor places on each real property parcel and on each individual’s taxable personal property . Under state law, all non-agricultural assessments must be based on the property’s market value as of January 1 . State law recognizes that every municipality cannot be assessed exactly at market value each year . The law requires that each municipality is within 10 percent of market value once every five years . Assessed values are used to distribute the municipality’s tax burden among the individual property owners .
- b. Equalized value It is necessary for the DOR to determine an equalized value by taxing jurisdiction . Equalized values are needed since property is assessed in different taxing districts at different percentages of market value . Uniform values are called equalized values because local levels of assessment are equalized and all non-agricultural property are valued on an equal basis, namely 100 percent of market value . The equalized values are used for apportioning county property taxes, public school taxes, vocational school taxes and for distributing property tax relief . Note: The assessed value is important for maintaining equity among individual taxpayers within the municipality while the equalized value maintains equity between municipalities and counties .
- c. Uses of equalized value Equalized values are used by the taxing jurisdictions (ex: school districts, counties, state) to apportion their tax levies among municipalities . Apportioning is the process of dividing the tax levies for each taxing jurisdiction among all of the municipalities that contain territory in the jurisdiction, based on each district’s total value . (ex: a state levy would be apportioned among all of the municipalities in the state; an individual county’s levy among all of the municipalities in the county; and a school levy among all of the municipalities in the school district) .
The value of all property in different municipalities (but in the same taxing jurisdiction) must be known to calculate how much of the total tax levy to apportion to each municipality . The values determined by local assessors cannot be used to apportion levies among different municipalities . To do so would violate the rule of uniformity, since the assessed values are not comparable among municipalities, whereas the equalized values are all at market value .
This mathematical example helps show how equalized values are used.
Example:
- County has within its borders three primary assessment districts: town, city and village
- County wishes to levy a property tax of $40,000
- Since the county has no assessment roll of its own, it will apportion the total levy among the three primary assessment districts by sending a bill to each of them
- Assessed and equalized value of three primary assessment districts and the county are shown below
| Local Assessed Value | % to County Total of Assessed Value | Full Value or Equalized Value | % to County Total of Equalized Value | Ratio of Assessed Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town | 2,100,000 | 28.4% | 2,000,000 | 25.0% | 105.0% |
| City | 4,500,000 | 60.8% | 5,000,000 | 62.5% | 90.0% |
| Village | 800,000 | 10.8% | 1,000,000 | 12.5% | 80.0% |
| County Total | 7,400,000 | 100.0% | 8,000,000 | 100.0% | none |
Since the county levy is a levy on property, the most logical way to apportion that levy among the districts is according to th proportionate amount of property in each district.
If the assessed values were used, the apportionment of the county levy would be:
| Town | 28.4% | of | $40,000 | = | $11,360 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 60.8% | of | $40,000 | = | $24,320 |
| Village | 10.8% | of | $40,000 | = | $4,320 |
| Total County Levy | $40,000 | ||||
By using the equalized values, the apportionment of the county levy is changed substantially:
| Town | 25.0% | of | $40,000 | = | $10,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 62.5% | of | $40,000 | = | $25,000 |
| Village | 12.5% | of | $40,000 | = | $5,000 |
| Total County Levy | $40,000 | ||||
While the example relates only to the apportionment of the county tax, the apportionment of school tax, sanitary districts and other apportionments follow a similar pattern . There are over 100 statutory uses of equalized values
4-6
IV. Assessors
- A. Certification
- State law requires certification of assessors by DOR . Certification involves an exam that tests their knowledge of appraisal and assessment law and administration . While there is no formal training required, assessors must show that they have acquired the knowledge essential to do a satisfactory job through successful completion of the certification exam . In addition, many full time assessors in Wisconsin are active in professional organizations with established professional standards for assessors and appraisers . The municipally employed assessor and the independently contracted assessor and their staffs (except clerical help) must have current assessor certification at the appropriate level . Five levels of assessor certification
- Assessment Technician
- Property Appraiser
- Assessor 1
- Assessor 2
- Assessor 3
- B. Wisconsin Property Assessment Manual (WPAM)
The WPAM specifies technical, procedural and administrative practices . It also defines procedures, policies, legal decisions and assessor performance expectations .
State law (sec . 73 .03, Wis . Stats .), provides the authority for preparing the WPAM . The law requires DOR to prepare a manual that discusses and illustrates accepted assessment methods, techniques and practices with a view to more nearly uniform and consistent assessments of property at the local level . It also requires that the manual be amended by DOR from time to time to reflect advances in the science of assessment, court decisions concerning assessment practices, statutory changes, costs, and statistical and other information deemed valuable to local assessors by DOR .
V. Assessment Process
- A. Municipal assessor is responsible for the assessment process:
- Discover – all real and personal property is subject to tax unless exempted by law
- List – property characteristics determine value
- Value – determine the value subject to property tax
- B. Assessment classification
State law requires the assessor to classify land on the basis of use . Classification affects the assessed value . Beginning with assessments as of January 1, 2017, 2017 Wisconsin Act 115 created the following provision for drainage district corridors: "…the assessor shall assess the land within a district corridor described under s . 88 .74 in the same class under sub . (2)(a) as the land adjoining the corridor, if the adjoining land and the land within the corridor are owned by the same person ."
Drainage districts are local governmental entities organized under a county drainage board for the primary purpose of draining lands for agriculture . A drainage district establishes a legal mechanism for managing drains and related facilities to ensure reliable drainage . Landowners who benefit from drainage must pay assessments to cover the cost of constructing, maintaining, and repairing district drains . Of the 72 counties in Wisconsin, 31 of them contain one or more drainage districts and can be located on an interactive map on the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection website: Wisconsin Drainage Districts .
Eight statutory classifications for real property
- Residential (Class 1) – sec . 70 .32(2)(c)3 ., Wis . Stats .
- Any parcel (or part of a parcel) of untilled land not suitable for the production of row crops, on which a dwelling or other form of human abode is located
- Vacant land where the most likely use is residential development » Mobile homes assessed as real property are classified as residential
- Apartment buildings of up to three units are also classified as residential
- Commercial (Class 2)
- Land and improvements primarily devoted to buying and reselling goods
- Includes the providing of services in support of residential, agricultural, manufacturing and forest uses
- Manufacturing (Class 3)
- State law (sec . 70 .995, Wis . Stats .), provides for the state assessment of manufacturing property
- Contact the Manufacturing Bureau District Office for information on qualifying uses
- Agricultural (Class 4)
- State law (sec . 70 .32(2)(c)1g ., Wis . Stats .), describes this as "land, exclusive of buildings and improvements, which is devoted primarily to agricultural use"
- Land devoted primarily to the production of crops (excluding forestry operations) or the keeping, grazing, or feeding of livestock for the sale of livestock or livestock products
- Buildings and dwellings associated with growing, production and associated services are classified as "Other" (Class 7)
- Agricultural Assessment Guide for Wisconsin Property Owners provides classification examplesBack to table of contents8 2019 Guide for Property Owners Wisconsin Department of Revenue
- Undeveloped (Class 5) – sec . 70 .32(2)(c)4 ., Wis . Stats .
- Areas commonly called marshes, swamps, thickets, bogs or wet meadows
- Fallow tillable land (assuming agricultural use is the land’s highest and best use)
- Road right-of-way, ponds and depleted gravel pits
- Land because of soil or site conditions is not producing or capable of producing commercial forest products
- Agricultural forest (Class 5m)
- Under state law (sec . 70 .32(2)(c)1d, Wis . Stats .), defines agricultural forest as land producing or is capable of producing commercial forest products, if the land satisfies any of the following:
- Forest land is contiguous to a parcel that is classified in whole as agricultural land . The forest land and the contiguous agricultural parcel must have the same owner . Contiguous includes separated only by a road .
- Forest land is located on a parcel containing agricultural land for the January 1, 2004 assessment and on January 1 of the current assessment year
- Forest land is located on a parcel where at least 50 percent of the acreage was converted to agricultural land for the January 1, 2005 assessment year or thereafter » Agricultural Assessment Guide for Wisconsin Property Owners provides classification examples
- Productive forest land (Class 6) – sec . 70 .32(2)(c)2 ., Wis . Stats .
- Land producing or capable of producing commercial forest products . Forest land cannot include buildings and improvements .
- Forested areas that are managed or set aside to grow tree crops for "industrial wood" or to obtain tree products (ex: sap, bark, seeds)
- Forested areas with no commercial use made of the trees, including cutover
- Cherry orchards, apple orchards and Christmas tree plantations are classified as agricultural property
- Lands designated Forest Crop Land and Managed Forest Land by the Department of Natural Resources are entered separately in the assessment roll
- Improvements on Forest Crop Lands and Managed Forest Land must be listed as personal property under state law (sec . 77 .04(1) and sec . 77 .84, Wis . Stats .)
- Forested areas primarily held for hunting, trapping or in the operation of game preserves, must be classified as forest, unless clearly operated as a commercial enterprise or exempt
- Other (Class 7) – sec . 70 .32(2)(c)1m ., Wis . Stats . Buildings and improvements on a farm (ex: houses, barns and silos along with the land necessary for their location and convenience)
- C. Property information
Wisconsin has an annual assessment . This means that each year’s assessment is a new assessment . The assessor is not obligated to keep the same assessment each year . The assessor may change your assessment because of building permits or sales activity even if he or she did not inspect your property .
The law requires that property be valued from actual view or from the best information that can be practicably obtained . An interior inspection results in a better quality assessment; however, it is not always possible to conduct interior inspections . To ensure receiving a complete and accurate valuation, it benefits the property owner to provide interior viewing access of their residence . For the purposes of valuation if access is denied, the assessor will then base the valuation on the next best information available . However, if facts exist making an interior view necessary to complete an accurate valuation, the assessor may seek a special inspection warrant under state law (sec . 66 .0119, Wis . Stats .), to view the interior of the home .Back to table of contents9 2019 Guide for Property Owners Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Notification Process with Request to View Property Notice – (sec . 70 .05(4m) and (4n), Wis . Stats .), requires assessors to provide property owners written notice when requesting an interior view of the residence . DOR recommends sending a letter, allowing 14 calendar days for a response . If the assessor does not receive a response, they may attempt in-person contact to obtain consent . If that step is unsuccessful, the assessor may send a certified letter including the notice . If an interior view remains necessary to complete an accurate valuation, refusal of entry can provide basis for seeking a special inspection warrant .
- Sale of the property
- When a property sells, the assessor must review the sale
- Assessor verifies the facts surrounding the sale to determine if it is an arm’s-length sale and usable for assessment purposes, this may include an interior inspection (requiring notice to the property owner) of the property
- Assessor uses sales to update assessments in a municipality when conducting a revaluation (Reassessment/ Revaluation)
- New construction and improvement maintenance
- Under state law, the assessment must be based on the market value of the improvement . The assessor looks at how much the total value of the building and land changed due to the improvement . The cost may not be the true measure of any change in market value . However, under many circumstances, a prudent property owner will calculate the change in value due to remodeling approximates the cost of such work . If there is an increase in market value, it should be reflected in an increase in assessed value .
- If a building is under construction as of January 1, the best way for the assessor to get this information is with an on-site inspection and recording the data on the appropriate property record card
- On-site inspection reveals new or remodeled improvements not previously recorded
- If the property owner started new or remodeled improvements before January 1 (the assessment day) and finished after January 1, the assessor must find out how much was completed as of January 1 and assess the existing improvements as of January 1
- Normal home repairs and maintenance generally prevent property values from falling and usually do not warrant a change in the assessment
Example: A property is worth $90,000 . As of January 1, the property owner started an addition, but only has a foundation . The property should be appraised at the $90,000 plus the value of the foundation as of January 1 . In such a case, the value of the foundation should be determined by the construction cost and could possibly be verified with construction receipts or the building permit .
D. Equitable assessment If your property’s assessment ratio is similar to the assessment level of the taxation district (see Definition of Terms section of this guide), then your assessment is equitable . To determine your property’s assessment ratio, divide your property’s assessed value by your property’s current market value .
Your Property’s Assessed Value = X%Current Market Value of Your Property
To make a sound decision, you must know your property’s assessed value, current market value and the assessment level of the taxation district .
- Sources of information are listed below
- Property’s assessed value is recorded in the assessment roll and is shown on your tax bill
- Purchase price is usually the best evidence of market value if you have recently purchased the propertyBack to table of contents10 2019 Guide for Property Owners Wisconsin Department of Revenue
- Sale price of other property comparable to yours is the next best evidence of market value
- Professionally prepared appraisal is a reliable estimate of market value
- Assessment level of the taxation district – to view, contact the assessor
- Estimated fair market value of your property (determined by dividing your assessment by the assessment level) is shown on your tax bill
- Assessment compliance Under state law (sec . 70 .05(5)(b), Wis . Stats .), each municipality must assess all major classes of property within 10 percent of full value in the same year, at least once within a five-year period . A 'major class' of property is defined as a property class that includes more than 10 percent of the full value of the taxation district . If a municipality is non-compliant after four consecutive years, the Department of Revenue (DOR) must notify the municipality of its non-compliance status . DOR issues the municipality a second non-compliance notice after five consecutive years of non-compliance, and issues an order for supervised assessment after six consecutive years of non-compliance .
Full Value Law (sec. 70.05(5), Wis. Stats.) An example of how DOR monitors compliance under the six-year cycle .
- 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 – First Notice of Non-Compliance The municipality has been non-compliant for four consecutive years, DOR issues the first notice of noncompliance by November 1, 2014
- 2015 – Second Notice of Non-Compliance The municipality has been non-compliant for five consecutive years, DOR issues the second notice of noncompliance by November 1, 2015
- 2016 – Order for Supervised Assessment The municipality has been non-compliant for six consecutive years, DOR issues an order for a state supervised assessment by November 1, 2016
- 2017 – DOR Supervises a Revaluation State supervised assessment completed
E. Notice of changed assessment
Under state law (sec . 70 .365, Wis . Stats .), whenever an assessor changes the total assessment of any real property (or any improvements on Managed Forest Land that are taxed as personal property under sec . 77 .84(1), Wis . Stats . by any amount, the owner must be notified . However, failure to receive a notice does not affect the validity of the changed assessment .
The notice must be in writing and mailed at least 15 days (30 days in revaluation years) prior to the BOR meeting (or meeting of the Board of Assessors if one exists) . The notice contains the changed assessment amount and the time, date and place of the local BOR (or Board of Assessors) meeting . The notice must include information notifying the owner of the procedures to use to object to the assessment . The notice requirement does not apply to personal property assessed under Chapter 70 .
F. Assessment roll Each property is described in books called "assessment rolls" that are open for examination at the clerk’s or assessor’s office during regular office hours . You may also view properties other than your own . Personal Property rolls are generally kept in alphabetical order by name of the owner .Back to table of contents11 2019 Guide for Property Owners Wisconsin Department of Revenue Assessment roll contains the following for each property:
- Parcel number (also appears on tax bill)
- Property owner’s name and address
- Legal description of the property
- Assessed values, by class
G. Assessment questions Contact your assessor if you have questions about your assessment:
- When you meet with your assessor, review your property records and discuss how your assessment was made
- Assessors maintain a record of your property, which includes a physical description and information on how your assessment was developed
- These property records are considered open records, which means the public has the right to inspect them . This right does not include information gathered under a pledge of confidentiality or where access is restricted by law, such as personal property returns
- You may also view the records for other properties
- Discussing your assessment with the assessor may eliminate the need for a formal appeal to the BOR
H. Open Book Attend the Open Book if you are unable to meet with your assessor – highly recommended
- Open Book refers to a period of time (before BOR begins) when the completed assessment roll is open for examination
- This period of time is an opportunity to discuss your property value with the assessor and provide reason for changing the value, if appropriate
- Assessor must be present for at least two hours while the assessment roll is open
- State law (sec . 70 .45, Wis . Stats .), requires the municipal clerk (or commissioner of assessments in first class cities) to publish or post a notice specifying the open book date(s) at least 15 days (30 days in revaluation years) before the first day the assessment roll is open for examination
- Instructional materials on appealing your assessment to the BOR should be available at the open book
- At Open Book, the assessor is allowed to make any changes that are necessary to perfect the assessment roll
- When Open Book ends, any changes to the assessment roll (your property value) requires formal process in front of the Board of Review or circuit court
- Board of Review starts a minimum of seven days after the assessment roll is open for examination (Open Book) under state law (sec . 70 .45, Wis . Stats .) (sec . 70 .47(1), Wis . Stats .)
VI. Board of Review (BOR)
A. Appealing your assessment
If you disagree with your assessment, under state law (sec . 70 .47, Wis . Stats .), you may appeal the assessment . The BOR is the first step in the appeal process (except for appeals to properties in cities with a Board of Assessors as described previously) . There is a local BOR for all property assessed by the local assessor . The Wisconsin Board of Assessors reviews manufacturing property assessed by the state assessors .
You may also appeal the property classification since it affects the assessed value of land classified as agricultural, undeveloped and agricultural forest .
The property owner cannot appeal to the circuit court under an action for certiorari or to DOR under state law (sec . 70 .85, Wis . Stats .), unless he or she first appears before the BOR .
- Requirements to appeal an assessment to the BOR a . If you intend to file an objection, you must file a written or oral notice of intent to appeal with the BOR clerk at least 48 hours before the first scheduled BOR meeting
- BOR may waive the 48-hour notice deadline
- If it is shown good cause and the submitted written objection within the first two hours of the BOR’s first scheduled meeting, the BOR may waive the 48-hour notice requirement
- BOR may also waive the requirement up to the end of the fifth day of the BOR session if you submit proof of extraordinary circumstances for failing to meet the 48-hour notice and failing to appear during the first two hours of the first scheduled meeting
- You must file a completed written and signed form of objection to property assessment with the BOR clerk within the first two hours of the BOR’s first scheduled meeting
- 1) Objection should be filed in writing at least 48 hours before the BOR’s first meeting
- 2) You must object to the property’s total value
- 3) If an improved parcel, you cannot object to only the land value or only the improvement value
- 4) Objection forms are available from the local clerk
- BOR is responsible for raising and lowering any incorrect valuations and for correcting any errors in the roll .
- Note: BOR’s function is not one of valuation, but of deciding if the facts presented, under oath before the BOR, are valid . All deliberations must be done in open session and the BOR is required to decide each objection by a roll call vote . If the BOR votes to change an assessment, it must state on the record the amount of the correct assessment and that the correct assessment is reasonable in light of all relevant evidence received . Notices of the BOR’s determinations are to be sent to property owners as the BOR completes its work .
- Information used to determine assessments Assessors consider information from many sources to determine your assessment .
- Examples:
- • Comparable property sales, including recent arm’s-length sale(s) of comparable properties dated on or before the assessment date of January 1 of the assessment year
- • Current construction costs
- • Improvements to property • Location • Depreciation
- • Legal restrictions (ex: zoning ordinances)
- • General economic changes in the community
- Appealing to the Board of Assessors (BOA)
The City of Milwaukee and the second class cities (those that choose to do so) have a BOA . If a BOA exists, it is the first step of assessment appeal . This BOA is comprised of assessment personnel from the assessor’s office . The BOA is responsible for investigating all objections to valuation brought before it . If you are dissatisfied with the BOA determination, a property owner has 10 days from the receipt of the determination to notify the assessor that he or she would like to present testimony before the BOR .
B. Providing information to the BOR
State law allows the BOR to accept sworn written statements or testimony by telephone from property owners . The BOR determines whether it accepts information in writing or over the phone . Contact the municipal clerk to determine if the BOR accepts these forms of information .
State law allows the BOR to waive the BOR hearing for the property owner to appeal directly to the circuit court . The BOR determines whether it will waive the BOR hearing . Contact the municipal clerk if would like to appeal directly to the circuit court . Note: You cannot appeal your assessment to DOR under state law (sec . 70 .85, Wis . Stats .) . To help you understand the appeal process, view the flow chart the end of the appeals section .
The BOR can accept testimony by telephone, upon oath, from all ill or disabled persons . You must be prepared to present to the BOR a letter from your physician, surgeon or osteopath confirming your illness or disability . This letter should be filed with your objection form . You may designate a personal representative to appear before the BOR on your behalf . You must submit a completed agent authorization request with the objection form .
- Testimony at hearing Keep in mind, the assessor’s value and classification are presumed correct . You should not make the mistake of comparing your assessment to other properties . To have the assessment reduced, you must prove the property is over assessed compared to sales in the municipality . To have the classification changed, you must prove the property is not classified according to its predominant use .
- Under state law (sec . 70 .47(7)(ae), Wis . Stats .), if you are planning to protest an assessment, you must provide the BOR, in writing, your estimate of the land value and all improvements you are objecting . You must specify the information you used to arrive at that estimate . You should have information on the market value of your non-agricultural property, including: a recent arm’s length sale of your property and recent sales of comparable properties . Other factors include: size and location of the lot, size and age of the building, original cost, depreciation and obsolescence, zoning restrictions and income potential, presence or absence of various building components; and any other factors or conditions affecting the property’s market value .
- The BOR allows sufficient time for the assessor and the objector to present information . The assessor can also request the BOR to subpoena witnesses to provide sworn testimony .
- BOR member qualifications
- Generally, the BOR consists of municipal officials . In first class cities and in all other towns, cities and villages who pass an ordinance to that effect, the BOR may consist of five to nine residents of the town, city or village . In most cases, the municipal clerk also functions as the BOR clerk .
- A BOR may not convene unless it includes at least one voting member who attended a BOR training session within the two years prior to the BOR’s first meeting . Each year, the municipal clerk must provide an affidavit to DOR stating whether the member training requirement is fulfilled .
- Back to table of contents14 2019 Guide for Property Owners Wisconsin Department of Revenue
- BOR meetings/hearings The BOR meets each year, any time during the 45-day period beginning on the fourth Monday in April, but no sooner than seven days after Open Book . In towns and villages the BOR meets at the town or village hall or some other place designated by the town or village board . If there is no hall, it meets at the clerk’s office . In towns, it meets at the place where the last annual town meeting was held . In cities, it meets at the council chamber or some other place designated by the council . In Milwaukee it meets at a place designated by the tax commissioner .
- If the assessment roll is not completed, the BOR must adjourn for the time needed to complete the roll and must post a written notice on the outer door of the meeting place stating the time and date the meeting is adjourned .
- During the first two hours of the BOR’s first meeting, the assessment roll and other assessment data are open for examination . If you are filing an objection to valuation, you must submit your written objection before the first meeting or during the first two hours (except, with proof of extraordinary circumstances, an objection may be filed up to the end of the 5th day of the BOR session) . The BOR must establish a time for hearing each properly filed objection . At least a 48-hour notice of the hearing time must be given to the objector or the objector’s attorney, and to the municipal attorney and assessor . When all parties are present and waive the notice, the hearing may be held immediately . The BOR corrects any errors in assessment that were made, inadvertently or otherwise .
- The BOR examines the roll and corrects all apparent errors in descriptions or calculations, and adds any property to the roll the assessor may have omitted . The BOR must notify the property owners concerned and hold hearings before it adds omitted property to the assessment roll and before any other lawful changes can be made .
- All BOR meetings and deliberations must be publicly held and open to all citizens at all times . At least 15 days (30 days in revaluation years) before the first session of the BOR, the clerk must publish a class 1 notice in the newspaper, post notices in at least three public places in the taxation district and on the door of the town, village or city hall . The notice must specify the time and place of the BOR’s first meeting . The notice must also contain the procedural requirements of state law (sec . 70 .47(7)(aa) and (ac) to (af), Wis . Stats .) .
-
Statutory requirements include:
- Prohibiting a person scheduled to appear before the BOR from contacting or providing information to any BOR member about their objection
- • oviding a notice to the BOR’s clerk at least 48 hours before the first BOR meeting, stating whether the objector is asking for removal of a board member from hearing his or her appeal, identifying the person to be removed and estimating the length of time of the hearing
- Requiring the objector, when appearing before the BOR, to specify (in writing) an estimate of his or her property’s land and improvement value and to specify the information used to arrive at that estimate
- Prohibiting a person from appearing before the BOR if he/she or the assessor valued the property using the income approach unless the owner supplies the assessor with all the income and expense information the assessor requests
- State law (sec . 70 .47(7)(aa), Wis . Stats .), provides that the BOR may deny a hearing to a property owner who does not allow the assessor to complete an exterior view . However, the Wisconsin Supreme Court expressed due process concerns regarding a similarly worded statute in Milewski v.Town of Dover, 2017 WI 79, 377 Wis . 2d 38, 899 N .W .2d 303 . It is DOR’s recommendation to allow a BOR hearing even if the property owner denied an interior or exterior view . The lack of access to view, and the credibility of evidence offered can be managed as an evidentiary issue at a BOR hearing, rather than denying access to the BOR .Back to table of contents15 2019 Guide for Property Owners Wisconsin Department of Revenue
- Removal of a BOR member
- a. Objector can remove a BOR member (except in First and Second class cities), if either of these conditions apply:
- Person objecting to his/her assessment requests the removal of a BOR member for any reason – only one member may be removed for this reason
- Member must show bias or prejudice (ex: a separate pending court action)
- b. Request to remove a member or members of the BOR must meet the following requirements:
- Request must be made at:
- The time the objector provides his/her written or oral notice of intent to file an objection
- At least 48 hours before the first scheduled BOR meeting or at least 48 hours before the objection is heard if the BOR waived the 48-hour notice requirement
- Notice must identify the member(s) to be removed
- BOR members may be removed for other reasons . A municipality must remove any BOR member who has a conflict of interest under a municipality ordinance in regard to the objection . An interested party can also remove a BOR member for bias when submitting an affidavit that states the nature of the bias or prejudice . In addition, any BOR member who violates the code of ethics for local government officials under state law (sec . 19 .59, Wis . Stats .), by hearing an objection shall recuse himself or herself from the hearing .
- Request must be made at:
- a. Objector can remove a BOR member (except in First and Second class cities), if either of these conditions apply:
- Appeal a BOR Decision
- A property owner has two ways to appeal a BOR decision . One is appealing to the circuit court under state law (sec . 70 .47(13), Wis . Stats .), and the other is appealing to DOR under sec . 70 .85, Wis . Stats . If a number of property owners feel there are severe inequities in the entire assessment roll, they may appeal for a reassessment of the entire municipality under sec . 70 .75, Wis . Stats . (see 70 .75 Reassessment Guide) .
- a. Appeal BOR Decision to Circuit Court Under state law (sec . 70 .47(13), Wis . Stats .), you may appeal a BOR determination by action of certiorari (a court order to review the written record of the hearing) to the circuit court . The court will not issue an order unless an appeal is made to the circuit court within 90 days after the you receive notification from the BOR . You cannot submit new evidence . The court decides the case based solely on the written record made at the BOR . If the court finds any errors in the BOR proceedings that make the assessment void, it sends the assessment back to the BOR for further proceedings and retains jurisdiction of the matter until the BOR determines an assessment in accordance with the court’s order . Whenever the BOR makes its final adjournment prior to the court’s decision, the court may order the municipality to reconvene the BOR .
- b. Appeal BOR Decision to DOR When you appeal a BOR decision to DOR, under state law (sec . 70 .85, Wis . Stats .), DOR must receive a written complaint within 20 days after you receive the BOR’s determination, or within 30 days of the date specified in the affidavit under sec . 70 .47(12), Wis . Stats ., if the taxpayer does not receive the notice . You must submit a filing fee of $100 with the complaint . You may appeal both real and personal property under this section . DOR may not review the assessment if it is within 10 percent of the general level of assessment of all other property in the municipality, or if the property’s value exceeds $1,000,000 as determined by the BOR . DOR may revalue the property and equalize the assessment without the intervention of the BOR, if the revaluation can be accomplished before November 1 of the assessment year or within 60 days of the receipt of the written complaint, whichever is later . If DOR adjusts the value, it is substituted for the original value in the assessment and tax rolls, and taxes are calculated and paid accordingly . You may appeal DOR’s decision, by an action for certiorari, in the circuit court of the county where the property is located
- A property owner has two ways to appeal a BOR decision . One is appealing to the circuit court under state law (sec . 70 .47(13), Wis . Stats .), and the other is appealing to DOR under sec . 70 .85, Wis . Stats . If a number of property owners feel there are severe inequities in the entire assessment roll, they may appeal for a reassessment of the entire municipality under sec . 70 .75, Wis . Stats . (see 70 .75 Reassessment Guide) .
C. Flowchart of the assessment appeal process
If you are not satisfied with your assessment, then consider the following assessment appeal process
- Discuss your assessment with the Assessor
- Do you still wish to appeal?
- no - stop
- yes
- Does your community have a Board of Assessors?
- Yes, Appeal to the Board of Assessors, (Continue appeal? yes/no)
- No, Appeal to the Board of Review (Continue with appeal yes/no)
- Next avenue of appeal 2 options Department of revenue s.70.85 or ciruit court s 70.47(13)
7-11
VII. Reassessment/Revaluation
The term reassessment, under state law (sec . 70 .75, Wis . Stats .), means to completely redo the assessment roll . After receiving a petition, DOR may order a reassessment of all (or any part) of the taxable property in a municipality if its investigation determines the assessments are not in compliance with the law . DOR appoints one or more persons to prepare a new assessment roll . The assessment roll, after completion by the appointed person(s), is substituted for the original assessment roll . The municipality pays all expenses connected with a reassessment .
A revaluation is done by the assessor when the property records are outdated or inaccurate, assessment uniformity is poor, a full revaluation hasn’t been done for 10 years, or reassessment is required under state law (sec . 70 .75, Wis . Stats .) . A full revaluation includes on-site inspections (interior and exterior), measuring and listing all buildings,taking photos, and sketching buildings .
A. Initiating a reassessment
Under state law (sec . 70 .75, Wis . Stats .), except in first class cities (Milwaukee), the owners of at least 5 percent of the assessed value of all property in the municipality may submit a written petition to DOR for a reassessment of the municipality . The basis of the petition must be that the property assessment in the taxation district is not in compliance with the law and the public interest will be promoted by a reassessment . A petition for reassessment may be obtained from the Equalization Bureau District Supervisor . The District Supervisor can also answer any questions you may have about circumstances of a potential sec . 70 .75, Wis . Stats ., petition . It is not necessary for property owners to have appeared at the BOR to petition for a reassessment .
B. Supervised assessment A supervised assessment is an alternative to a reassessment . Under state law (sec . 70 .75(3), Wis . Stats .), one or more persons are appointed by DOR to assist the assessor in making the assessment for the following year . DOR supervises the assessment work . The municipality pays all costs involved in a supervised assessment . A supervised assessment is very similar to a revaluation under sec . 70 .055, Wis . Stats ., in that new assessment records and assessed values are created . The previous year’s assessment roll is not affected .
C. Initiating a revaluation Whenever the governing body of any town, village or city believes it would be in the public interest to hire expert help to aid in making an assessment, it should contact the nearest Equalization Bureau District Office . The Equalization supervisor will review the assessment situation and make recommendations to that municipality . These recommendations could range from spot adjustments (without expert help) to a complete revaluation of all taxable property (by expert help) . If, after this consultation, the governing body believes it would be in the public interest to have a complete revaluation, it can pass a resolution per state law (sec . 70 .055, Wis . Stats .), to hire expert help . A complete revaluation of all taxable real and personal property within a municipality is periodically necessary. There may be several reasons for this, including:
- Current assessment was not made in substantial compliance with the law • Inequities may exist within property classes • Inequities may exist between property classes
- Governing body may want updated records to show the physical characteristics of all its taxable real and personal property
- Governing body may want an original inventory of all its taxable property
When inequities happen, some property owners are paying more than their fair share of the property taxes and some are paying less . A complete reassessment or revaluation may be the only remedy . Most property owners are willing to pay the expenses of a revaluation to be assured that all are paying their fair share of property taxes .
Property owners fear that taxes will go up if a revaluation is done . This may or may not be the case . Taxes are directly tied to the amount of money that the municipality needs to collect . This is called the levy . If the total levy remains the same, only those properties that are not presently paying their fair share of the tax burden will pay more taxes after a revaluation . Properties presently paying more than their fair share will pay less .
Another area that property owners question is the tax rate . If the assessed values established by a revaluation are greater than they were before and the tax levy is the same, then the tax rate will be less . For example, if the tax levy remains unchanged and the total assessed value of the taxation district is doubled, the tax rate will be cut in half .
Before revaluation
- Levy/(Total Assessed Value) = $200,000/$4,000,000 = .05 or 5%
- After revaluation Levy/(Total Assessed Value)=$200,000/$8,000,000= .025 or 2 .5% D.
- Trespassing and Revaluation Notice
State law lists the following requirements before entry onto private property or a construction site (not including buildings, agricultural land or pasture, or livestock confinement areas) is allowed, once per year (assessment cycle), for property tax assessment purposes unless the property owner authorizes additional visits:
- Purpose – reason for the entry must be to make an assessment on behalf of the state or a political subdivision
- Date – entry must be on a weekday during daylight hours, or at another time as agreed upon with the property owner • Duration – assessor’s visit must not be more than one hour
- Scope – assessor must not open doors, enter through open doors, or look into windows of structures
- Notice – if the property owner or occupant is not present, the assessor must leave a notice on the principal building providing the owner information on how to contact them
Denial of entry
The assessor may not enter the premises if they received a notice from the property owner or occupant denying them entry . The assessor must leave if the property owner or occupant asks them to leave . (sec . 943 .15(1m)(f), Wis . Stats .)
If a reasonable written request (see Notification Process with Request to View Property Notice) to view the property is refused, the assessor should not enter the property . The assessor may seek a special inspection warrant to view the property, if necessary . The assessment should be based on the best information available – recent sale of the subject or comparable properties, building permits, or previous viewings . Notification must be published or posted before an assessor begins a revaluation . State law (sec . 70 .05(5)(b), Wis . Stats .) provides that before a city, village or town assessor conducts a property revaluation, the city, village or town must publish a notice on its municipal website stating a revaluation will occur, listing the approximate dates . The notice should describe the assessor’s authority to enter land, under sec . 943 .13 and sec . 943 .15, Wis . Stats . If a municipality does not have a website, it must post the required information in at least three public places within the city, village or town .
The city, village or town should provide a link to the above noted statutory references, so persons visiting the website can click those links and review the statutes . (see sample notice)
E. Sample Revaluation Notice
A revaluation of property assessments in the (municipality) shall occur for the (year) assessment year. The approximate dates of the revaluation notices being sent to property owners is expected to be in (month/year). Please also notice that the Assessor has certain statutory authority to enter land as described in state law (secs. 943.13 and 943.15, Wis. Stats.).
The ability to enter land is subject to several qualifications and limitations, as described within the foregoing statutes. Copies of the applicable statutes can be obtained at public depositories throughout the State of Wisconsin, and from the Wisconsin State Legislature website or a copy may be obtained from the municipal clerk upon payment of applicable copying charges.
VIII. Levy and Rates
The governing body of each town, village, city, county, school district and state, levies the total amount of tax to be raised . However, it is the city, village or town that prepares the tax bill and collects the initial tax payment .
Each year the governing body of the city, village, town, county and school district adopts a budget for the following year . To finance the expenditures in the budget, it totals all expected revenue sources (ex: state aids, shared taxes, license fees, tuition) . This amount is then subtracted from the estimated expenditure figure and the remainder must be raised from the property tax . In the case of the forestation state tax, the levy is determined by the state legislature and is applied in terms of a statewide rate ($ .1697 per $1,000 of full value) .
A. Tax rate
The tax rate is the rate necessary to raise sufficient money from the property tax to meet the levy . The tax rate is determined by dividing the total assessment of a district into the levy . The rate is often expressed in terms of dollars per thousand .
Each municipality must raise the funds needed to operate its own functions in addition to its share of the funds needed for the county and school district operations along with the state forestation tax . The total amount of the levy must be divided by the total assessed value of the municipality to establish the tax rate .
Example:
| Tax Rate= Levy/(Assessed Value)= $1,000,000/$25,000,000= .04 | |
|---|---|
| City of Badgerville | $200,000 |
| County Levy | $230,000 |
| School District(s) | $560,000 |
| State (forestation) | $10,000 |
| Total Levy | $ 1,000,000 |
This example shows that the City of Badgerville must raise a total levy of $1,000,000 . The total assessed value of the City of Badgerville is $25,000,000 . Using these figures, the tax rate on property located within the City of Badgerville would be .04 per dollar of assessed value . Badgerville’s tax rate is $40 per $1,000 of assessed value.
B. General property tax bill
Using the previous example, suppose you own a $50,000 home in the City of Badgerville that is assessed at $45,000 . All property in the City of Badgerville is being assessed at 90 percent of market value .
Your Tax = Your Assessed Value x Tax Rate
Your Tax = $45,000 x .04 = $1,800 .00
State legislature provides for annual property tax relief. Your tax bill receipt from the City of Badgerville shows:
General Property Tax 1,800 .00
State Credit 300 .00 *
Balance Due $ 1,500.00
*The amount of State Credit is determined by a statutory formula and varies from year to year and from one tax district to another .
C. School taxes
Education in Wisconsin through high school is financed heavily by local revenues which in turn rely strongly on the general property tax . Property tax is based on the property’s market value rather than benefits received, and must consequently fall uniformly on all taxable property .
IX. Collection
A. Property tax bills Initial payments are made to local treasurers (or if later in the year, to the county treasurer) . Municipalities turn a sizable portion over to other governmental units (school, county) .
State law requires a municipality to mail the property tax bill to the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s designee . If the tax bill is mailed to the taxpayer’s designee, the designee must provide the taxpayer with a copy of the bill . The tax bills are usually mailed in December .
B. Payment of property taxes This depends on the payment schedule your local government provides . Some municipalities allow payment in more than two installments and may have different plans for both real and personal property taxes . State law provides the following payment schedule unless your local governing unit enacted a different schedule . Be sure to check with your local clerk to ensure timely payment of your general property taxes .
- Real estate taxes
- If you pay by installment, your first payment is due by January 31 . Pay your local treasurer .
- If you do not pay in installments, you must pay your taxes in full by January 31 . Pay your local treasurer .
- July 31 – the last day for your second installment payment of real estate taxes . Pay your county treasurer .
- Personal property taxes – paid in full by January 31 to the local treasurer
C. Interest on unpaid taxes
If you pay your taxes late, you must pay interest on the unpaid portion . This interest goes back to February 1 and accumulates at the rate of one percent per month . In addition, some counties impose an additional penalty of one half of one percent per month . If you don’t pay your taxes at all, you may lose your property .
The sale or purchase of property may result in the tax bill not being sent to the correct property owner . Although the municipality is required to mail the tax bill to the taxpayer or to the taxpayer’s designee, failure to receive the tax bill does not relieve the taxpayer of the obligation to pay the tax or any interest penalty . After purchasing a property, if you do not receive a tax bill, contact your municipality to ensure it changed its records showing you as owner . If you receive a tax bill when you no longer own a property, contact the municipality and provide the new owner’s name and address .
D. Unlawful tax claim
- Sec. 74.35, Wis. Stats., provides for the recovery of unlawful taxes under very specific conditions. An unlawful tax occurs when one or more of the following errors are made:
- Clerical error made in the property description or in the tax calculation
- Assessment included real property improvements that did not exist on the January 1 assessment date
- Property was exempt from taxation
- Property was not located in the municipality
- Double assessment was made
- Arithmetic, transpositional or similar error occurred
- Note: An unlawful tax does not include judgment questions about the valuation . The subjective valuation issues must be addressed through the BOR appeal process .
- You can recover unlawful taxes under state law (sec. 74.35, Wis. Stats.), by filing a claim with your municipality. The claim must:
- • Be in writing
- • State the alleged circumstances for the claim
- • State the amount of the claim
- • Be signed by the claimant or the claimant’s agent
- • Be served to the municipal clerk
A claim for the recovery of unlawful taxes paid to the wrong municipality must be filed within two years after the last date specified for timely payment of the tax . All other claims for recovery of unlawful taxes must be filed by January 31 of the year the tax is payable . No claim may be made unless the tax, or any authorized payment of the tax, is timely paid . If the municipality approves the claim, payment must be made within 90 days after the claim is allowed .
E. Excessive assessment claim
Under state law (sec . 74 .37, Wis . Stats .), you may file a claim to recover the amount of general property tax imposed because the property assessment was excessive .
To file a claim on excessive assessment, you must first appeal to the BOR (unless notice under sec . 70 .365, Wis . Stats ., was not given) . You must file the claim with the municipality by January 31 of the year the tax is payable .
Claim must:
- Be in writing
- State the alleged circumstances for the claim
- State the amount of the claim
- Be signed by the claimant or the claimant’s agent
- Be served to the municipal clerk
You cannot file a claim on excessive assessment if you appealed the BOR’s determination to DOR or to the Circuit Court . No claim may be made unless the tax is timely paid .
If the municipality approves the claim, payment must be made within 90 days after the claim is allowed .
F. Denial of unlawful tax or excessive assessment claim
If the municipality denies the claim, it must notify you by certified or registered mail within 90 days after the claim is filed . You may appeal the decision to the Circuit Court if you feel the decision is incorrect . You must appeal within 90 days after receiving notice that the claim is denied .
If the municipality does not act on the claim within 90 days, you have 90 days to appeal to the Circuit Court .
X. Assistance with property taxes
If you have a property tax question, first contact your local assessor . The assessor is familiar with your local area and has a copy of the property tax statutes, the Wisconsin Property Assessment Manual and other information .
For additional questions on property tax, contact the DOR Equalization Bureau District Office in your area .
A. Homestead tax credit
- Income based property tax credit program for homeowner and renters
- Reduces the property tax burden through a direct payment to low and moderate income Wisconsin residents
- Amount of the benefit varies, depending on total household income and property tax liability
- Renters count part of their rent as property taxes
- For more information, contact: Wisconsin Department of Revenue Homestead Credit Unit PO Box 8906 Madison, WI 53708 8906 (608) 266 8641
B. Property tax deferral loan program
- Provides loans to qualifying elderly homeowners to help pay for property taxes
- Principal and interest are repaid when you transfer ownership of your home or move from your home
- Loan becomes a lien against your property
- Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA) operates this program
- For more information, contact: Property Tax Deferral Loan Program, WHEDA PO Box 1728, Madison, WI 53701-1728 (800) 755-7835
C. Assistance for the elderly
- Voluntary Income Tax Assistance information (VITA) and Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) information is located on DOR’s website
- VITA is listed by county . These sites are designed to work on income taxes . The program also assists individuals who qualify for homestead credit or the earned income credit that helps with property taxes .
D. Property tax exemption for veterans
- State of Wisconsin does not offer a property tax exemption for veterans
- Department of Veterans Affairs administers the Wisconsin Veterans and Surviving Spouses Property Tax Credit program under state law (sec . 71 .07(6e), Wis . Stats .)
- Property tax credit provides a refundable property tax credit to eligible Wisconsin veterans and eligible surviving spouses .
- To be eligible for the property tax credit, the law requires that the veteran was a Wisconsin resident at the time of entry into active service or was a resident of this state for any consecutive five-year period after entry into active service .
- For more information, contact: Department of Veterans Affairs 30 West Mifflin Street, PO Box 7843 Madison, WI 53707-7843 (608) 266-1311 Fax: (608) 267-0403
XI. Real Estate Property Tax Bill
Your real estate property tax bill lists more than just how much you owe . Your tax bill also contains information about Local Spending, Local Assessment Practices, State Aids and Credits to Local Governments, Tax Rate, Special Purpose Costs, and Payment Procedures .
Property tax bill example Refer to the example property tax bill while reviewing the next few pages . Your Property Tax Bill format may be slightly different from the example bill, however, it will still contain the same information
- Property tax year A property tax bill delivered to you in December applies for the property tax in that same year . Payment is due in full by January 31 . This due date does not indicate that the payment is for the next year property tax assessment . Property tax bills are always sent out in the year in which they apply
- Local assessment practices Bill and Sue Homeowner’s land assessment and the home and other buildings assessment on the land are added together for the total assessment . The Total Assessed Value is estimated by the local assessor . DOR calculated the Average Assessment Ratio of the Village of Badger as a percentage . When an Average Assessment Ratio is considerably above or below 100 percent (or 1 .0), a community-wide reassessment may be forthcoming . State law requires average assessment ratios to be within 10 percent of market value, that is, between 90 percent and 110 percent once every five years . This requirement promotes tax fairness . When community assessments are not regularly updated to reflect changes in the real estate market, unfair taxation can result . As properties increase in value at different rates, some property owners pay too much in tax and others pay too little . The Total Estimated Fair Market Value is calculated by dividing the Total Assessed Value by the Average Assessment Ratio . Property taxes are levied on the Total Assessed Value, not the Total Estimated Fair Market Value .
- Use-value assessment of agricultural land Note: If an entire parcel contains farmland assessed according to its use-value as agricultural land, the Estimated Fair Market Land and Total Estimated Fair Market Value cannot be estimated using the Average Assessment Ratio and, therefore, will not be shown .
- Unpaid prior taxes Owners with a star in the box noting unpaid prior year taxes should contact the county treasurer to resolve this issue .
- Net assessed value rate The Net Assessed Value Rate is the same as dollars per $1000 of assessed property value . The Net Assessed Value Rate is calculated by adding each taxing jurisdiction’s mill rate less the state credit .
- Credit to local government Part of the state credit consists of a School Levy Tax Credit
- Local spending Bill and Sue Homeowner live in Badger, Wisconsin where five taxing jurisdictions exist (state, county, village, school district, techical college) . Common taxing jurisdictions include the State of Wisconsin (forestation tax), county, municipality (city, village, or town), local public schools, technical college, and sanitary district . Other districts may also be listed on your Property Tax Bill .
- State aids and credits to local governments Wisconsin is almost unique among the states in terms of the amount of taxes raised at the state level, but spent at the local level . Bill and Sue Homeowner can compare the Estimated State Aids Allocated to the tax district to the prior year figures . Bill and Sue Homeowner’s share of the Net Tax in the tax district before Special Purpose Costs . This amount contains the tax owed to each taxing jurisdiction . The Two Years Net Tax amounts by tax jurisdiction are also listed along with a percent change comparison column . Bill and Sue Homeowner can compare the percent change of the Prior Year Net Tax figures to the Present Year Net Tax figures for each jurisdiction including the Totals for each tax year . The Lottery Credit for Bill and Sue Homeowner’s property are listed in the Taxable Year .
- First dollar credit The First Dollar Credit is paid to the owner of any real estate parcel where at least one improvement owned by the landowner is located . The credit equals the school property tax on a certain amount of the value of the improvements . This credit value is calculated every year by DOR, after taking into consideration the estimated number of claims expected to be paid and school property tax rates (for K-8, Union High, and K-12 school districts) .
The credit value is set at the level that distributes the available funds . If the value of the parcel exceeds the credit value, a full credit is paid . However, if the value of the parcel is less than the credit value, the credit is paid on the actual value of the parcel .
The First Dollar Credit is shown on property tax bills as a reduction of property taxes due . For taxpayers who pay their taxes in two or more installments, the credit is applied equally to each installment .
The credit is paid to municipalities on the fourth Monday of July . The municipality treats the credit the same as general property tax collections paid by taxpayers .
12-15
XII. Tax Rate
The Net Assessed Value Rate is the same as dollars per $1,000 of assessed property value . The Net Assessed Value Rate is calculated by adding each taxing jurisdiction’s mill rate less the state credit .
In this case, Bill and Sue Homeowner will pay for each $1,000 of assessed value . By taking this Net Assessed Value Rate and multiplying it by Bill and Sue Homeowner’s Total Assessed Value, you determine Bill and Sue Homeowner’s property tax before the lottery credit and any special purpose costs are included
XIII. Special Purpose Costs
Special assessments
Your tax bill may contain a special assessment for some type of public work (ex: sewer, water, street, alley, sidewalk) . The assessor does not make special assessments . They are based on the cost of the improvement or the repair and billed only to properties benefiting from the work . If you have a question about a special assessment, contact your local clerk .
Bill and Sue Homeowner have some additional costs taxpayers in other districts may not see on their tax bills . Special Assessment, Special Charges or Special Taxes are listed in the upper-right section of the tax bill . Most of these costs are listed on the tax bill by type (ex: curb and gutter, street, refuse collection, or weed control .
XIV. Payment Procedures
Bill and Sue Homeowner may pay the taxes in one of two ways . They can pay the amount in full to the local municipal treasurer by January 31 after the December statement . Or, they can pay in installments . If the taxes are paid by installment, the first payment is due to the local treasurer by January 31, and the second payment is due to the county treasurer by July 31 . A third payment option, multiple installments, is available in some municipalities if they have adopted a special multi-payment plan . Since Bill and Sue Homeowner’s tax bill does not mention any other installment method, this payment option is not available
XV. Definition of Terms
Apportion:– once the amount of taxes to be levied by each taxing jurisdiction has been determined, the total tax levy must be divided, or apportioned, among all the taxation districts which contain territory in the jurisdiction .
Arm’s length sale: – sale between two parties, neither of whom is related to or under abnormal pressure from the other .
Assessed value – dollar amount assigned to taxable real and personal property by the assessor for the purpose of taxation . Assessed value is estimated as of January 1 and will apply to the taxes levied at the end of that year . Assessed value is called a primary assessment because a levy is applied directly against it to determine the tax due . Accurate assessed values ensure fairness between properties within the taxing jurisdiction . (See Equalized value for fairness between municipalities) .
Assessment level – relationship between the total assessed value and the equalized value of nonmanufacturing property minus corrections for the prior year over and under charges within a municipality – town, village, or city . For example if the assessed value of all the property subject to property tax in the municipality is $2,700,000 and the equalized value in the municipality is $3,000,000 then the "assessment level" is said to be 90% ($2,700,000/$3,000,000 = .90 or 90%) .
Assessment ratio – relationship between the assessed value and the fair market value For example, if the assessment of a parcel which sold for $150,000 (fair market value) was $140,000, the assessment ratio is said to be 93% (140,000 divided by 150,000) . The difference in the assessment level and the assessment ratio is that the level typically refers to the taxation district; the ratio refers to the individual parcel . The assessment ratio does not apply to agricultural lands, agricultural forest, or undeveloped lands
Chattel – in law, any property other than a freehold or fee estate in land . Chattels are treated as personal property, although they are divisible into chattels real, and chattels personal .
Equalized value – estimated value of all taxable real and personal property in each taxation district, by class, as of January 1 and certified by DOR on August 15 of each year . The value represents market value (most probable selling price), except for agricultural property, which is based on its use (ability to generate agricultural income) and agricultural forest and undeveloped lands, which are based on 50 percent of their full value .
Excessive assessment – an appeal to the municipality under sec . 74 .37, Wis . Stats . claiming a property assessment is excessive . The property owner files a claim against the municipality to recover the amount of property tax imposed as a result of the excessive assessment .
Fair market value – synonymous with a property’s full value, market value or – in the case of personal property – true cash value . Fair market value is "the amount the property will sell for in an arms-length transaction on the open market between a willing seller not obliged to sell the property and a willing buyer not obliged to purchase it ." Waste Management v. Kenosha County Board of Review, 184 Wis . 2d 541, (1994) .
Full value – (1) the value at 100 percent of the value standard . This is the value that should be applied in assessing the property per Wisconsin statutes, see pages 7-6 and 7-7 of the WPAM . (2) The same as equalized value, however is often used when referring to the value of school and special districts .
Levy – amount of tax imposed by a taxation jurisdiction or government unit
Market value – definition of market value is the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus . Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
- Buyer and seller are typically motivated;
- Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests;
- A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
- Payment is made in terms of cash in U .S . dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and
- The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing
Reassessment – revaluation of all properties within a given jurisdiction for the purpose of establishing a new tax base . When a written complaint is made to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue by the owners of 5 percent or more of the assessed valuation of the property within a municipality stating that the assessment of property in the municipality is not in substantial compliance with the law and that the interest of the public would be promoted by a reassessment, the department can order such actual doing over of the assessment roll (reassessment) of all or part of the taxable property in municipality .
Revaluation – placing new values on all taxable property for the purpose of a new assessment . The previous year’s assessment roll is not affected . The term is often used in conjunction with sec . 70 .055, Wis . Stats ., where expert help can be hired to work with the assessor in revaluing the district .
Tax rate – generally expressed in dollars per hundred or dollars per thousand (mills) applied against the tax base (assessed value) to compute the amount of taxes . The tax rate is derived by dividing the total amount of the tax levy by the total assessed value of the taxing district .
Taxation district – town, village, or city . If a city or village lies in more than one county, that portion of the city or village which lies in each county . (See sec . 74 .01(6), Wis . Stats .) .
Taxing jurisdiction – entity which is authorized by law to levy taxes on general property which is located within its boundaries . (See sec . 74 .01(7), Wis . Stats .) . In addition to towns, villages and cities, this includes school districts, sewerage districts and lake rehabilitation districts, for example .
Unlawful tax – an appeal to the municipality under state law (sec . 74 .35, Wis . Stats .), claiming a tax is unlawful because a clerical error was made in the description of the property or computation of the tax, the assessment included improvements which did not exist on the assessment date, the property was exempt from taxation, the property was not located in the municipality, a double assessment was made, or an arithmetic transposition or similar error has occurred .
Use-value – value a specific property has for a specific use . Beginning in 2000, agricultural property is assessed according to its use as farmland instead of its market value as indicated by sales . The guideline values are based on 5-year average income and expense data modified by the tax rate in each taxation district in the state .
Use-value assessment – assessment based on the value of the property as it is currently used, not its market value . This only applies to agricultural land . The guidelines for the use values are based on administrative rules, and developed by DOR staff serving as support for the Farmland Advisory Council who adopts the values
Contact Information
Equalization Bureau Contact Information
Eau Claire District Office (79)610 Gibson St, Ste. 7 Eau Claire, WI 54701-2650
eqleau@wisconsin.gov
Ph: (715) 836-2866 Fax: (715) 836-6690
Green Bay District Office (81)
200 N. Jefferson St, Ste. 126 Green Bay, WI 54301-5100
eqlgrb@wisconsin.gov
Ph: (920) 448-5195 Fax: (920) 448-5207
Madison District Office (76)
Mailing Address PO Box 8909 #6-301 Madison, WI 53708-8909
Street Address 2135 Rimrock Rd #6-301 Madison, WI 53713-1443
eqlwau@wisconsin.gov
Ph: (608) 266-8184 Fax: (608) 267-1355
Milwaukee District Office (77)
819 N. 6th St, Rm. 530 Milwaukee, WI 53203-1682
eqlmke@wisconsin.gov
Ph: (414) 227-4455 Fax: (414) 227-4071
Wausau District Office (80) 730 N. Third St Wausau, WI 54403-4700
eqlwau@wisconsin.gov
Ph: (715) 842-5885 Fax: (715) 848-1033
WISCONSIN POLICY FORUM (WISCONSIN TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE) Articles 1 & 2
Article 1
Article 1 - Two keys to property tax understanding
In brief:
December property tax bills are just around the corner. Assessment increaases often lead taxpayers to expect a tax increase. Official talk of tax rate cuts often leads citizens to expect lower tax bills.Neither expectation is mecessarily correct. Taxpayers need to focus on what matters most: proposed budgets and tex levies.
Capitol Notes
Rasmussen Reports released tracking poll results throughout 2006. A common story in midwest industrial states was ealy difficulty for Democratic candidates followed by comfortable leads: Illinois (-6 pts. in April, now +8); Michigan (-5 in July, now +11); Ohio (+4 in Jan., now +12); Pennsylvania (-3 in April, +18 now)
Wisconsin is different. For much of the year, the Democratic lead has varied little - between four and eight points. Latest October results showed no change (+4) In Minnesota and Iowa, party candidates have traded leads several times.
Riddled with small deductions and exemptions that few taxpayers use, Wisconsin's income tax is unnecissarily complex. Finding the same on thefederal level, Oregon Senator Ron Wyden (D) urges a bipartisan reform effort, such as teh successful Reagan-Bradley package of 1986.Focus has not recently discussed assessment. Responding to requests, we return to the topic. Still misuderstood, tax rates are also covered.
Local governments are busty setting property tax levies for the coming year. December tax bills can't be far behind. With them invariably comes suprise, relief, or anger. Two of the most common causes are confusion over assessment and confusion over tax rates.
Property Tax Keys
- Higher assessments don't necessarily mean higher taxes.
- Lower tax rates don't necessarily mean lower taxes.
Many property taxpayers typically and incorrectly believe that :
- An increased assessment means a tax increase; and
- official promise of a reduced tax rate means a tac cut.
Neither is necessarily true.
Detour: Values confuse issue
Much of the confusion about assessment and tax rates has to do with a third factor: property values. If values never change, assessments would never have adverse tax conmsequences....and tax rates would rise and fall with state adn local budget decisions.
Of course, property values do change. The market for most types of property in most parts of teh state has, until recently, been strong. Since 2000 the total value of Wisconsin residential property has increased an average of almost 10% annually.
Such rapid growth allows public officials to tout falling tax rates, even if they are raising taxes. And it means that assessments increase from time to time. Back to the confusion both cause.
Higher assessments
If explained in the usual way drawing on technical tax terms, an assessment increase can be saunting. However, understanding one importan concept helps: A community's total tax levy is divided among individual properties according to each owner's share of total community property value.
Thus, if you own 1% of a community's total value, you pay that same 1% of total propety taxes. Suppose your home and lot are assesed at $200,000 and the total value of your community is $200 million. Further suppose that the community's total property tax levy is $2 million. You aown 0.1% of the community's value, so you are responsible for 0.1% of the levy, or $2,000 ($200,000,000X0.1%)
Does a rising assessment guarantee a tax increase? Not at all. What matters is not the dollar value of the assessment but your share of total community valuation relatie to other tax payers. Consider a few simple examples in a town with only two properties, each valued at $100,000, and a town tax of $4,000.
Second case. Now, assume the town's assessments are updated and each home is now worth $200,000. One owner immediately begins to worry about his $2,000 tax bill doubling. But will it? Each owner still accounts for one-half of the town's value ($200,000/$400,000), and each still pays one-half of the taxes ($4,000X1/2+$2,000) that the town levies.
The assessments doubled, but the tax bill remained the same. Why? First, each owner's home value increased at the same rate (100%) , and each still owned the same share of the town's total value. ANd, second, the $4,000 town levy did not change.
Third case: More spending. What if the levy did change?? Suppose the town asks for 50% more taxes, or $6,000. Even though each owner's share of town value remains one-half, each must now pay half of $6,000, or $3,000. Note that the tax increase is not due to the assessment change but, rather, to the town's tax increase.
Fourth case: Assessment change. The cause of tax increases is often growth in budgets and tax levies. Howrver, there are times when a assessment change canmean a hight or lower property tax.
The following example illustrates how changing assessments can lead to hight taxes for some and lower taxes for others. The owners of the tow $100,000 homes again recieve assessment increase, but this time the the increwases differ. One owner's valuation doubles, as before, to $200,000. But the other's triples, soaring to $300,000. The town's total value and the othr owns tree-fiths ($300,000/$500,000).
Finding th tax rate:Tax Rate Tax levey - .02%*
Property valuation
*or $20 of property tax for every $1,000 of property value
The result is bad and good news. Even if the town levy stays at $4,000, the second owner faces a tax icrease. With 60% of the taxes (60%X$4,000) or $2,400. The first owner, however receives some good news. Even though his home's value doubled to $200,000, his share of town value fell from 50% to 40%. So his tax bill drops to $1,600 (40%X$4,000). Clearly, there are cases when higher asssessments result in tax increases and decreases.
Lower tax rates
Just as rising property values can lead to taxpayer anxiety over rising assessments, they can also be used to mask local tax increases. Imagine a mayor who proudly announces a 5% drop in the tax rate. Many residents take this news at cace value and eagerly await a 5% drop in their tax bills. Should they? Not if they understand what a tax rate is.
The idea is fairly straightforward, as the picture abouve suggests. Take the total tax levy and divide by the community's total property value; the result is the tax rate. Thus, if the town wants to collect $4,000 in taxes and its total value is $200,000, then the tax rate is $4,000 (tax levy) / $200,000 (total town value), or .02.
Sometimes, the tax rate is given as a mill rate, or the amount of taxes due for each $1,000 of property value. In theis case, the levy per $1,000 of prperty value. In this case, the levy pr $1,000 of property value. In this case, the levy per $1,000 is: $4,000/$200 (thousand), or $20 for every $1,000 of value. Whether the rate is .02 or is $20 per $1,000, the bill is the same ($2,000).
Because property balues have been increaseg, it has been easy in recent years for local officials to point to stable or falling tax rates, even when taxes are rising. Returning to prior town example, suppose total property values jump 50%, from $200,000 to $300,000. As long as the town board increases taxes less than 50%, the tax rate drops.
For example, if the levy is raised $500, or 12.5%, to $4,500, the taxx rate will still drop from .020 (or $20 per $1,000) to .015 (or $15 per $1,000). The math behind the new tax rate is: $,500/$300,000=.015.
Final word
Unhappy taxpayers need to focus on local budgets and tax levies. Remember the two keys (see oposite side): Higher assessments don't guarantee higher taxes, and lower tax rates are no promise of lower taxes
Focus is published by the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance, 401 N. Lawn Ave., Madison, WI: three times monthly during March through june; and semimonthly during other months. Subscriptions ar $49 for one year and $99 for three years. WISTAX contributor of $75 or more receive a free copy. Media reprinting is encouraged with credit to WISTAX requested.
Article 2
Focus
In Brief 01.20.2010 no.1
With state aid cuts and volatile real estate market, changes in local property tax bills from last year to this vary greatly-and taxpayer qustins are unusually plentiful/ Basic concepts and specific examples are offered here to raise citizen understanding of Wisconsin's confusing property tax system.
Capitol notes
Gov. James Doyle (D) signed into law a bill requiring teaching of labor history in Wisconsin schools, the first of its kind in the US. Supporters say the law fosters greater understanding of the state's rich labor tradition,while opponests argue it is another unfunded mandate on pulic schools
Based on work of the Governor's Global Warming Task Force, the legislatrue will soon begin work on the Clean Energy Jobs Act. The legislation proposes more aggressive renewable energy standards and efficency goals, while lifting the state's mratorium on nuclear construction. Business groups worry about the economic impact of the proposals, while state officials expect them to create a minumum of 15,000 new jobs by 2025.
Three UW System schools make Kiplinger's Personal Finance Top 100 Best Values among public universities list. UW-Madison was 14th, followed by UW-La Crosse (43) and UW-Eau Claire (67). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was seen as the nation's best value.
Understanding property tax surprises
Questions about property taxes abound every year at this tiem, but they are particularly plentiful now. Part of the reason is short-term: job losses, a depressed real estate market, and rare cuts in state aid to local governments and schools.
Other reasons for property tax confusion are timeless. Many taxpayers do not understand how individual properties and entire communities are valued for tax purposes. And even fewer appreciate how tax changes vary within a county or school district due to local conditions.
Basic concepts
To avoid such confusion, it helps to understand a few concepts about WIsconsin's property tax system:
- A municipality is responsible fro determining the market value (assessments) of each property within its boundaries.
- Not all municipalities keep their asessments current, although some large ones can, thanks to computers and full-time staff. However, many municipalities update them only when state law requires it.
- With communities doing revaluations sporadically, county and school tax levies cannot be dived up (approtioned) among underlying municpalities using assessed values. To ensure fair apportionment of taxes, the state Department of Revenue estimates the full market (equalized) value of entire communities (not individual properties) each year.
- This means that Wiscons has two kinds of values, assessed values for individual properties and equalized values for larger taxing areas, such as towns, villages, or school district.
- In addition to these"givens," one additional insight aids understanding of how prperty taxincreases or decreases can vary among neighborhoods in a a single community or among municipalities in a school district or county. The amount of property taxes owed can be understood without mastering assessment, equalization, or the concfusing math of tax rates, for the process is similar to slicing and comparing pieces of cake.
Slicing up small-town taxes
Suppose small town "A" has five properties. (1,2,3...), each assessed at $100,000. The total assessed cvalue of Town A is $500,000 (5X100,000). The value of property #1 represents one-fifth of Town A's total assessed value, she pays one fifth of total property taxes (see below)
Slicing up school taxes
- What happens when a school district (or county) needs to collect property taxes from its multiple municipalities?
- Amongh municipalities. Suppose a school district contains two towns (A and B), each with an equalized value of $500,000, and one village C, with an equalized value of $1 million (m). The total value of the school district is $2m (500,000+5000+1m).
- When the school distrcit asks for property taxes, it divides its levy among the three municipalities, according to their respective equalized values. Town A, with $500,000 in equalized value, represents 25% (500,000/2m) of total district value. If the total school levy is $100,000, A's share of that is also 25% or $25,000 (.25X100,000)
- Among property owners, But how does Town A get $25,000 to pay the school district? Taxes within the town are again divided among owners according to their shares of total assessed value. The $25,000 in shcool taxes is divided up the same way: Owner #1 owns 20% of A's assessed value and pays 20% of the school tax or $5,000.
Explaining the unexplainable
Owner #1's $5,000 school tax bill results from her share of town assessed values (20%) x her town's share of school district equalized values (25%) x the district's tax levy ($100,000)
Slight changes in the original example can result in tax changes ranging from -20% to +100% for individual owners in Town A, even though the school levy remains unchanged at $100,000. In the second example, Town A's equalized value is increased from $500,000 to $1M, while owners' individual assessments are unchanged. This could happen if the state increased town A's equalized value by $500,000 to reflect a large new lakefront development nearby, while the town did not update it assessments. The town share of distrcit school taxes jumps from 25% to 40% and every owner in A experiences a 60% tax increase ($5,000 to $8,000)
In the third example, Town A updates it assessments to reflect develpment of selected parcels, Owner #1 now has 25% of town assessed value, and faces a 10)% tax hike. Owner #2's share of value drops to 10% and he enjoys a 20% cut in shcool taxes.
These examples are extreme but clearly show that individuals can face large tax increases or cuts, even though the overall situation changes little.
Focus is published by the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance, 401 N. Lawn Ave., Madison, WI: three times monthly during March through june; and semimonthly during other months. Subscriptions ar $49 for one year and $99 for three years. WISTAX contributor of $75 or more receive a free copy. Media reprinting is encouraged with credit to WISTAX requested.
Vendor Proposals
Opportunities to respond to School District of Janesville Request for Proposals/Bids/Quotes (RFPs, RFBs, RFQs) may be listed on this page. The process, qualifications and forms needed for the Request can be found with each specific bid solicitation below.
If there are any available RFPs etc... they will be listed below. You will have to click on the box for more information about the proposal; you will then also be able to print a PDF.
Please contact the number provided in each proposal for questions.
No post to display.
